Three stooges ass navy
Three stooges ass navy
32 comments
-
-
Holy shit, it's the ghost of Kiev
-
Critical support for US navy, not something I thought I would say..
-
someone on telegram congratulated the US armed forces for shooting down their first terrorist.
-
oh fuck, that would be devastating if any of the swabbies could read
-
-
-
They’re lying. It was Ansarallah.
-
This was my reaction when I saw this too lol
-
It's a classic strategy, make a lie embarrassing enough and almost no one will question it
If you ever really need to get out of something, saying that you shit your pants will almost always work
-
Her: My dad says he found you masturbating noisily in the garden shed in the middle of the night.
/pops Mentos
Me: I had really bad diarrhea and was dehydrated.
-
-
-
-
Is John McCain back from the dead??
-
Does Ansar Allah even have fighter jets?
-
Yes, mostly Su-22 and a few F5. They also have a bunch of transport and attack helis.
These were used to bpmb the Pro-Saudi goverment and Islamist groups.
-
I heard somewhere they had one... F5
-
-
"Damn, those terrorists are getting more sophisticated all the time! Now their drones can mimic the exact signature of our F-18s!"
-
still not a great environmental impact but this is a better way of using ammo to keep the MIC happy
32 comments
actually hilarious that the navy saw a radar signature for a fighter jet whilst off the coast of Yemen and decided "yep that's definitely a hostile target" actual smoothbrain navy.
Don't F-18s have IFF too? Fuck sake lmao
All I'm saying is if you have a Yemeni drone following behind an F/A-18F on takeoff or landing, and an infrared heat seeking missile (SM-2 or SM-3) is fired at the drone, the F/A-18F's two jet engines have a much larger heat signature than the drone which makes for a juicy target, and the rest is history (for the F/A-18F).
I don't believe that amerikkkan ships have IR SAMs, just radar.
possible. I'm going off the assumption that it was using SARH which would easily differentiate between such targets BUT the SM-3 also has a passive infrared seeker so my theory is moot.
Also, just before posting this Houthis have claimed they shot it down lmao.
Not only that, but all military aircraft are outfitted with an enhanced version of IFF that includes an encrypted challenge/response that uses a rotating series of codes. IFF codes are loaded as part of preflight checks, so either they ignored it, or somebody really fucked up.
Its because Yemen shot it down. This is how amerika launders its losses.
If an hostile drone pops up in one of those corridors close to friendly aircraft, and it's fired upon, could it be possible for a friendly aircraft to get caught in the crossfire, with either a terminal active radar seeker or terminal infrared heat seeker locking onto the friendly aircraft instead of the hostile drone? I don't think those terminal seekers are connected to IFF, which is why a lot of these missile systems involve using both the semi active radar homing (which is connected to IFF) alongside the active radar or infrared seekers (not connected to IFF) for terminal guidance. That's my hypothesis at the moment, that Ansarallah exploited something there after the F/A-18F took off.
Either that, or someone on the missile cruiser left the CIWS on fully automatic operation by mistake, after being shot at by missiles and drones, and it lit up the F/A-18F right after takeoff. As far as I'm aware, CIWS is not connected to IFF.
Interested to know what you think of this.
Seriously L M A O
Houthis, well known for their fighter pilots
Either that or they seriously thought Russia/Iran were gonna just send fighter aircraft at an American cruiser which...L M A O