Twitter's Traffic Falling Relative to Bluesky

It'll take a while, but I do believe we're watching the downfall of Twitter.

And I suspect, now that Bluesky is the clear successor to Twitter, the process will only accelerate.

Give it 6 months and then musky's well funded administration will find a way to make bluesky feel the legal crunch
- They can just shift countries. 32% of Bluesky users are from Brazil, ~ 7% from Japan, ~ 4% from the UK and 2% from Germany.
Truth social hasn’t failed yet, it could lose money and it would just be a propaganda service that costs money instead of making money.
- It’s not going to have ~~funding~~ bribing problems until Trump is out of office.

Could bluesky have won over Mastodon because of the fediverse barrier where people doesn't know which server to choose?

Bluesky is being run by a funded professional startup team and is aimed at the masses. Mastodon is run by activists and software devs and brings in other like minded folks.
- Bluesky has an advertising budget. Bluesky has an entire team just working on User Interface.
  The fact that people are so lazy that they keep going for the corporate-sure-to-enshittify options shows how little people actually care about escaping corporate control of their lives.
  "It's not my job to contribute to a community project" is just another way to say "it's not my job to make the world a better place."
- Most importantly, Mastodon doesn't have the funding. It always astounds me how people miss that part.
  Money lets you fix a lot of problems. Not all. But many.
  Of course, it doesn't mean they'll succeed. Google+ had lots of money, too.
I use both. I've been on Mastodon for the better part of a year and only actively tried Bluesky the last couple months. My Bluesky feed is thriving, whereas Mastodon not so much. IMO this is due to Mastodon is missing the major quality of life features of Bluesky.
Add lists
Subscribable block lists
Custom subscribable topic feeds
Optional recommendation engine
These things make Bluesky very easy to get started with and more powerful even than Xitter was. It's simply a better product if you have any requirements other than federation. Getting a good feed up and running doesn't take more than an hour or two. Mastodon is a lot more work.
- Subscribable block lists... I'm making an account.
- The "starter packs" of Bsky is good, too. (Maybe that's your 'add lists' though.)
- There is starter packs now but not many have been made and I forgot the website that you find them.
- I go over there and search for stuff, and the page is always broken. It's been like that for weeks. You only get one page of results, and then you get an error. The infinite scroll doesn't work.
That was part of the reason. I tried explaining Pixelfed to my photographer dad and he completely lost interest when I mentioned instances and equated them to e-mail providers. Non-technical people don't like having to understand a technical aspect, and the nature of federation can't be avoided.
Keep in mind that these are the people who stayed on Twitter after it was infested by the musk. They're leaving because it's turned into a dogshit service, not because of any kind of moral stance. They won't choose one service over another because it's libre or decentralized or community-operated. They'll flock to one that has a low entry barrier and high population.
Speaking of which: Bluesky is where the people are. The merits of a social media provider are worthless if it has a fraction of the population of a direct competitor.
- We should just point normal people to the biggest instance and never mention anything until they're settled in.
- The merits of a social media provider are worthless if it has a fraction of the population of a direct competitor.
  No they aren't, the network effect isn't some magical all powerful force of nature that you cannot resist.
  We can choose to join a community that is small and help grow it, frankly if people aren't able to grapple with that I don't think they are ready to come here anyways which isn't to say that the fediverse doesn't need to work on becoming way more accessible and friendly to the average person.
I think that's a good part of it, to be honest. Plus I think also helps that Bluesky's handles look visually less confusing and unusual than the conventional double @ sign for the fediverse
@user.bsky.social vs @user@bsky.social
Plus other things like having starter packs
- Yes, I think the main problem of Mastodon is that it looks and behaves like if engineers designed it, not designers.
Bluesky offers better access to the content people want with less effort. Mastodon was always going to lose that battle.
Also helps it was created by Jack Dorsey.
- Who's now left Bluesky which is probably for the better given his views on a lot of things
- I don't know how many not tech savvy people know this, but it helps too.
That’s exactly it. People are bad at tech and do not understand it. If you even give them an additional option, this may confuse a tremendous amount of people enough to simply lose interest.
- That's the thing, though. Bluesky gives you that option, too. And you could always just sign up with the one big official Mastodon server.
  IIRC, they got hammered with new users back when Mastodon was more popular, and they couldn't keep up (since every server is run on a shoestring). So, they put s moratorium on new accounts, forcing people onto other instances. That might've been what hurt adoption.
I think it was mostly that Mastodon wouldn't send referer headers.
So when people look at where their traffic comes from, 50% would be unknown, 20% would be Twitter, 10% would be Bluesky, and most importantly, Mastodon would never show on that report.
(Numbers made up and inaccurate.)
Its also able to pay for advertising and marketing
- Do bluesky advertise itself?
Now someone have to write a server to federate to Bluesky, if for nothing more, as a reality check.
- Bridgy Fed exists to act as a bridge between AP and ATProto/blue sky if you want to use ATProto from Mastodon. Sadly, though, the bluesky user has to also follow the bridge for you to be able to see their posts from mastodon.
I joined Mastodon and it sucked, I didnt know where I was or what the significance of it was. Not a fan, lemmy is similar but seems to have less compartmentalisation relative to youe server.
You can choose a different server on Bluesky, too.
- Can you? I thought you could in theory, but it was all one server, theirs.

Who cares...it's just changing one shitpile for the next soon-to-be shitpile. Bluesky will inevitably go down the shitter too once its users have enough inertia to keep them there as they squeeze them dry.

Twitter isn't falling due to not being open source, or not being decentralized, or any of the other reasons I've heard people advocate for mastodon.
People are leaving twitter because it has gone fully right wing in politics. Twitter will not "fail" in the traditional sense. Twitter will fall, but not fail.
Twitter will be the right wing conspiracy platform.
Bluesky will be what twitter was 5 years ago for the left wing.
Nothing else has changed. This isn't a rebellion against corporate social media. This isn't meant to be a fediverse uprising. None of that is happening. This is nothing more than Mary, and Beth who voted for Harris wanting to use twitter how they used to, without right wing agenda being added to their twitter feed. Which is exactly what bluesky is. A twitter clone without the racists.
- Dare I suggest that the reason for twitter becoming so right wing, is that it's a centralized social media website, subject to the crazed far right whims of the capitalist who bought it...
- Twitter went right wing because of the model.
  When it’s all about following people and very short forms of communication, it will eventually lean right.
  Same way the lemmy format encourages nuance and ideas over people, so it will eventually lean left
Bluesky is at least semi-decentralized, however, though not to the same extent as something like Mastodon
I'd also argue that Twitter is also uniquely bad even among other problematic platforms
- Bluesky is at least semi-decentralized
  No it isn't, this is marketing and until the developers actually put their money where their mouth is and provide the genuine capacity for decentralization (not just along some narrow technical definition but actually decentralized in practice) this is pure marketing hype that you absolutely shouldn't trust until you are given indisputable proof and then you should still be skeptical because they can always pull the rug out from under you.
  Bluesky is open source yes, but what they are talking about is the CLIENT side of Bluesky, the actual system is dependent upon proprietary code that is most definitely not open source.
If nothing else I will personally find it very funny if Elon Musk spent $44,000,000,000 on something and then unintentionally destroyed it in just three years
- He didn't spend 44 billion on twitter. He spent 44 billion to gain a hand in the 2024 election. He already won.
- The Saudis footed the bill for most of that $44bn - most is only out of pocket about $10bn of it iirc.
  Fwiw he didn't actually intend to buy it, he was shitposting and got nailed by the SEC, only THEN did he try to work out what to do with it.
  Unfortunately the "what" turned out to be destroying democracy and helping Trump turn the US into a feudal state
Anyone who wants to see everything Musk owns crash and burn?

Does Musk actually care about Twitter any more?

It's served its purpose. It won the election for Trump. Musk will probably just focus on being Trump's puppy and let Twitter slowly die out.

Ok, can we puh-leese stop talking about corporate media siloses on the fediverse? I keep seeing Elon's stupid mug plastered all over the media, can Lemmy be the exception, pretty please?

I Set up the content filter with „Elon“ and „musk“ which significantly reduced it. Now it’s just posts like these that remain. Can’t recommend enough!
- But then how am I supposed to find out about the latest manly cologne?
We can stop talking about after we've destroyed it
- It's quite ironic that for a lot of people "destroying twitter" means spending half a day there, finding rage-inducing tweets and sharing them on other social media sites just so they can enjoy the free traffic and engagement. It would be nice if we could, you know, ignore it and let it die.
Content filters! I've got them for Trump, Elon, "Slammed", "Dragged", "Blasted" and the question mark, because news headlines in the form of questions can almost always be answered with the word "no" and are not worth my time.
- This is 100% the answer. My filter list is exhaustive and its curated a feed for me that doesn't actively destroy my mental health.

But if Elonjet is in Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/elonjet.net
- I don't understand why they don't just put up an RSS feed on elonjet.net Why even use social media posts? They've got their own website.

I would say musk got out of it what he could. Even if it went bankrupt I think he still got his money worth as mad as this sounds.

He “lost” about 75% value of twitter, from $44bn to $10Bn Musk is worth ~$440Bn.
That’s like a normal person with $50k invested losing about $3500 on a stock. You’ll notice it. But it doesn’t change your day any.
(Dunno about the math, might be off)

MySpace didn’t die overnight; didn’t it take like 8 years for Facebook to overtake it? Anecdotally in my group of friends, the big exodus from MySpace to Facebook took like 2 years from ‘08-‘10

It just occurred to me that the reason I don't remember those events, and have no basis to compare, because I had already left the platforms. Same for Digg.
I deleted my personal and business Twitter account the day Musk took over.

Good! Let's work to keep the momentum going and encourage everyone you know to boycott Twitter/X. If you still use Twitter/X make a post saying you can find me on Lemmy/Bluesky/Mastodon or whatever website/app you choose to replace it.

Don't let Elon Musk control you and your country, stop Twitter/X now!

Elon is teasing about offering an email service on X... why would anybody give him access to all of your private information?
- 50% off rust remover on your next Cybertruck

Ahaha YES!

So unfortunate that it had to be this way though, Twitter was the perfect name for such a social media app.

Yes you are right at this point!

I hope it'll start plummeting.