And I'm married, so I'm kind of asexual (at work), so we're ought to be friends!

It's probably a way for her not to be flirted with. To protect herself. So I'd say something reassuring like that.

Fantasy is right-leaning while SF is left-leaning. Easy peasy.

I think it was from Asterix and the Secret Weapon, but I lost this book so I can't check ^^.

There's no time of Moses. Moses is a mythical character (a lot of Christian like myself has no problems with the findings of archeology).

No need for toilet paper 😅

Strasbourg, France.

I begun judo a few weeks ago. The teacher was clear: it may not be useful in actual fight, but we don't fight often in the real life. But it's great for your body, spirit and it will teach you how to fall without hurting yourself. And these things are way more useful than self defense.

Y

G

And before that, pooping was a social function .

No. Those rules have to be learnt the hard way.

It's hard and change all the time, but it would be DS9, TNG, LD, SNW, TOS.

Fake, but even if it was true, the problem would have probably been the age change and not the gender change. Teenage relationships and adult relationships have different rules…

Oh we Europeans are definitively going there. We're just late, as usual.

I don't know why, I find it far easier from my computer. KDE Connect saved my (professional) life.

That's exactly what an IT person would say to hide the fact they watch what I do on my computer!

So how would the judges be appointed under this system and why is it better than having them chosen from the people?

By competition and diploma. A judge is a legal technician. Why elect him on political bases? We do not elect an engineer on political criteria, we take the one who seems the best among the candidates.

If the current system hasn't prevented political influence, then the method of choosing obviously isn't guaranteeing unbiased judges anyway, so what's the point in keeping it as opposed to elected judges?

What's the point to elect them?

Strong and diverse press, strong and enforced rules against politically motivated decisions. A judge should know that, if they don't strictly follow the law, they'll lose their job. This won't make the thing perfect, but far better than officially political judges.

O

I'm not vegan, but honestly I can understand. As soon as you have an opinion which is not the one of the majority, your posts, even in thematic spaces, are heavily downvoted, and it's tiring. I'm not conservative, I disagree with the posts in c/conservative, buy why would I downvote the things they publish there? A lot of Lemmy members do, however. Same with c/vegan or the religious communities.