Skip Navigation
263 comments
  • "After years of pushing their proprietary and closed solutions to privacy minded people Proton decided that it was in their best interest to further bury said users into their service as a form of vendor lock-in. To achieve this they made more non-standard desktop clients for their groupware features (contacts and calendars) and the bridge will be discontinued soon."

    Only if there wasn't CardDAV, CalDAV, IMAP, SMTP and dozens of other highly standardized protocols to handle e-mailing and groupware.

    • Is the bridge actually being discontinued? People have been saying that a lot recently but I've not seen any evidence for it, and not in the linked article.

      I'm annoyed that they don't support SMTP, but realistically they actually can't unless they have the ability to read your email, which they don't.

      • Is the bridge actually being discontinued?

        No, but what from their moves it is very clear it won't live long.

        they don’t support SMTP, but realistically they actually can’t unless they have the ability to read your emai

        Technically they do use SMTP... and it's possible for a provider and provide submission and generic SMTP do clients without having to read the email content.

        There are lots of ways to do e2e encryption on e-mail (no server access to the contents) over SMTP (OpenPGP, S/MIME etc.). There are also header minimization options to prevent metadata leakage. And Proton decided NOT to use any of those proven solutions (in a standard and open way at least) and go for some obscure implementation instead because it fits their business better and makes development faster.

  • https://encryp.ch/blog/disturbing-facts-about-protonmail/

    i'm begging you, don't buy snake oil.

    • Not only is this article three years old, it is also lacking in terms of sources. Additionally, the language and phrasing is quite inappropriate for the purpose of spreading the information. Lots of text is just mean and offensive without any actual purpose.

      It also seems to be largely based on speculation rather than actual solid evidence.

      I'm not against investigating the legitimacy of established and trusted privacy-first providers. However, this seems a bit lackluster.

      Also: Email is inherently insecure, we all know that. Proton services are open source, independently audited and verifiably E2EE, except for Mail, which uses PGP for the emails themselves and E2EE to store them.

263 comments