Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PO
Political Memes @lemmy.world

Why do we even have to have this conversation in the first place

623 comments
  • Electing Hindenburg really saved us from Hitler

    • Some on the left were still lukewarm towards Hindenburg; the Communists exploited this by running Thälmann and promoting him as "the only left candidate". Hindenburg failed to receive the requisite majority of votes in the first round, but was able to win reelection in the runoff.

      Hindenburg's reelection failed to prevent the NSDAP from assuming power. Two successive federal elections later that year left it as the largest party in the Reichstag, and anti-republic parties in general holding the majority of seats.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1932_German_presidential_election

      Hindenburg wasn't left enough for many of the Communists, and they thought that getting a candidate they'd feel better about supporting was more important than stopping Hitler.

      It was the last election many of them ever saw, although of course they didn't know it at the time.

      • That's not that point, Hindenburg was still elected as the lesser evil and Hitler was made fucking chancellor. Electing a lesser evil changes very little if they are still evil. Hindenburg was even supported by a large portion of the SPD (unfortunately). This is often seen as social democrats turning on the left as usual. Hindenburg wasn't even left, of course communist didn't support him.

        Hindenburg being elected did not stop the NSDAP from seizing power is the entire point of my argument. It only delayed it slightly. Having communist support would never have changed this. Having a communist government might have (but obviously that is pure fantasy given the political situation at the time).

        I'm actually realizing after my rambling that I'm not entirely sure what point you are trying to make? Are you suggesting is the fault of communist that Hindenburg's election was insufficient in preventing Nazi control? /Gen

        Edit: I think what you're saying is that communists almost put hitler in power sooner but introducing a third party candidate that took votes from Hindenburg?

        In this case I see what you mean and understand why you would see it that way. However this is the fault of the political system in place forcing that sort of situation which is why I advocate for the dismantling of that system. I do not agree with thälmann and the KPD's belief that a government and it's society can be reformed through electoralism. Materially I understand how placing a third candidate into that election was incredibly risky I just think that shouldn't be a problem. We shouldn't have to worry that pushing for progressive change within the system will cause the opposite.

        I'm with you when you say Biden is better than trump but I'm not with you when you attempt to work within a system that is designed specifically to benefit the bourgeoisie in order to improve conditions for the proletariat. In my eyes it's absurd to believe that its even possible to do so.

        Damage control does not lead to positive change, it just delays the inevitable harm

        If you're interested I recommend reading reform or revolution by Rosa Luxembourg. I don't expect you to radically change your views on this but I think you deserve to understand where I'm coming from. I get it if you think communist desire for revolution is pure fantasy, living within the imperial core will do that to you but please give it a shot. Try to understand. It's worth it, I was like you once. Most of us were.

623 comments