How Tariffs Work

From what I hear he likes that sort of thing. Could explain a lot.
- It's the real reason his face is colored like that.

60% of Canada's exports go to the US.
- The pic is still very accurate! Tariffs are paid by the buyers and ultimately passed down to the customer! Canada will probably largely shift its imports and exports to untaxed countries, funny since it will likely be china!
  It is also funny since one of his main campaigning point was to deal with the living expenses crisis and he is going to deal with that by raising prices a minimum of 10% plus whatever the comps throw on it, taking advantage of the price raise
  
  I'd love to get a hold of one of the Chinese EVs that are dominating the global market.
- It's more. Like 77%

my anger is that even if the tariffs go away at some point, its not like the price of anything will go down. did the coronavirus teach us nothing?

The only reason to use tariffs is to force your own people to NOT buy from a particular country. If it's every country... What is the point?
- Misery is needed to properly stablish a fascist regime.
- Dunning-Kruger effect. President Elon and First Bitch Trump think they're smarter than God.

- So he got what he wanted? Plan worked I guess. Mexico and Colombia folded. Will Canada be next one?
  What were people expecting? Let's compare numbers here. So according to various US dot GOV websites (you can google and get the numbers) I have obtain some numbers and round off for simple comparison.
  Mexico exports about $490 billion or nearly 80% of their goods the the US.
  In the meantime the US export about $360 billion or about <13% of total US exports (based on $3 trillion total export).
  Obviously they would fold. Do you know how many south american countries would love to step into Mexico's place?
  I don’t know what the end game is but propping up Canada for a fight they can't win is not the answer, they have numbers the same as Mexico (77% export volume to US making up 12% of total US imports).
  Up to you to make your own conjecture.
  EDIT: Apparently Canada folded as well.
  
  Canada didn't fold, the us did. Where on earth did you get the impression that Canada folded?
- Ah, it's one of those yenius business deals one gets from a pants grab. Makes sense he'd pivot that way, it's right on brand.
  But my president going the extra mile for all people is also right on brand. I hope her Mexico Embraces You program goes well for all those being deported. They should consider finding themselves a decent living here in Mexico if they can.

Would be more accurate if the piss blew right by Trump, then hit The American Tax Payer in the face instead.

He's kinda into this if the kompromat rumors are true.

- So Canada folded, what else is new

Why does the EU have massive tariffs then?
"The EU also maintains 142 tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) for agricultural products - a major frustration for Australia's exporters. Dairy faces the highest average tariff, at 32.3%. Sugar and meat are not far behind, at 27% and 19% respectively."
https://nff.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NFF_Factsheet_Australia-EU-FTA_2021A-1.pdf
- A hypothetical:
  Let's say, I want to further animal wellbeing and pass a law, that every pig has to have X amount of space. Now, all my farmers are at a global market disadvantage. Consequently, they will close shop, I will import pork from other unregulated countries. The pigs are still cramped somewhere else, I have destroyed my farming sector and my food security.
  That's why I can support some tariffs for essentials industries
  
  Strategic tariffs can be useful for lots of reasons. Protecting a culturally important industry, supporting certain values in that industry that aren't respected in other countries, maintaining an industry that is important to national security (e.g., domestic steel production) that would be difficult to ramp up in an emergency if the domestic industry collapses in the face of foreign competition.
  The inherent tradeoff is that there will be retaliation by the tariff recipient on some other industry in your country; you basically accept a detriment for one domestic industry to gain a benefit for another.
  But blanket tariffs are just stupid. There are lots of industries for which it will never be cheaper to produce locally than in low-wage countries in East or Southeast Asia and that are the kinds of jobs most industrialized nation workers just aren't interested in doing. Companies will simply pass that tariff onto consumers instead of investing massive capital and spending much more on labor to relocate domestically.
  People will buy less of everything because it's suddenly way more expensive. Companies will sell less and have to lay people off. Blanket tariffs are effectively a regressive tax increase that directly impacts economic growth.
  
  That's one point, but it's also a competitive measure. Australia has conditions that make them more competitive in things like dairy farming, wide empty and cheap land for example, that can sustain way bigger herds than most European farms, which allows them to sell the produce cheaper and still have a margin. Without some sort of regulatory measures this would ruin smaller dairy farmers in europe, because they have little to no way to compete with those prices.
  Also those tariffs are a bargaining chip in the EU-AUS free trade negotiations at the moment.
  Tariffs can be a very good tool to regulate prices or protect certain sectors that can't compete the same way as outside powers in a global economy. BUT there has to be a fine strategy to it, otherwise you're just kicking of trade wars.
- Why any tariffs indeed.
  Either cooperatives on a relation of trust and mutual ethics. Or don’t work together at all.
  The 1% doesn’t care about nations, that fact that it will just cost a little extra to fund their projects in some areas is just a game of monopoly to them.