Skip Navigation
hexbear @hexbear.net

Defederation from feddit.uk - info enclosed and feedback requested

Due to recent concerns surrounding feddit.uk's enforcement (or lack thereof) of policies against transphobia, and lemmy.blahaj.zone's unilateral defederation of that instance, it's clear we need to take action in order to protect our users.

For context, please see the following threads:

feddit.uk has been defederated (via blahaj)

Emperor (feddit.uk admin)'s response

Hexbear thread with further context and discussion

Seeing as the feddit moderation team's policies clearly do not align with our own stances on transphobia, bigotry, and reactionary rhetoric generally, we are considering two different options, with feedback requested for whichever route you would prefer (NOTE: we are primarily concerned with how trans users and other marginalized groups feel):

- Unilaterally defederate from feddit.uk due to lax enforcement of rules against transphobia and their admin citing the recent UK anti-trans court ruling as one of the reasons for this

- Remain federated with the instance at large while banning their admins, mods and any transphobic users, along with those who violate Hexbear CoC generally (the same way we handled issues with dbzero a while back)

We want to communicate these discussions we've been having behind the scenes to the userbase at large and allow those most impacted to give their input on how to proceed. Please give any feedback below.

126 comments
  • The situation for my trans siblings in the UK is absolutely dire rn. When the courts and the governments are out to strip them off their rights, they need solidarity, not backstabbing. Reacting to these developments by an internal discussion if transphobia should now be allowed on the instance means the admins have already chosen barbarism.

    • Yeah, absolutely despicable shit from the feddit.uk admins.

      It should go without saying that there was no need for a discussion for our instance. Hexbear admins were already in unilateral agreement that transphobic content isn't acceptable.

    • Reacting to these developments by an internal discussion if transphobia should now be allowed on the instance means the admins have already chosen barbarism.

      My vote is also

      and quite frankly I see this problem in the other option.

      As the old saying goes, if there's ten people dining with a Nazi at the table, there are eleven Nazis at the table. If you're choosing to say on the transphobia instance...

  • I dont think we should be taking into account whatever blahaj does before making our own deciaions, but i also dont think we need to discuss defederating from an instance chock full of loosely moderated reactionaries

  • They don't ban the transphobes.

    If, at some point, they stop treating transphobia like a moral dilemma and have a track record of moderating it right away, maybe we can reconsider

  • I don't think I've ever seen one of them on our local comms so I don't really care to weigh in one way or another.

    I will say having someone in a position of authority with the name "Emperor" is incredibly sauceless. If you're in control of something online your name should either be like "Dave" or "Weepo Gleepo"

  • As much as it would be nice to have around for the few posts that are relevent to me I'm gonna hae to go with

    just because of the excuse. Not only does the court case change nothing, but even if it did they should be enforcing their current anti-transphobia rules until they've reached a decision on how to implement it. They aren't, and are holding up an irrelevent court case as an excuse.

  • The admin's response is just very strange. Why does British law matter here? No one expects or wants forum rules to have a formal legal basis. It's something you make and enforce based on what kind of community you want to have, and if they're fine with transphobia because it's legal to be a transphobe, they clearly don't want the kind of community we do and we should defederate.

  • once again i am asking moderators to allow weighing in without requiring users to use site emojis. Jerbora does not support emojis and I am therefore unable to participate

    • The emojis are just a simple way for people to vote for an option, we take all feedback into account regardless of whether there's an emoji. I understand your frustration though.

    • If you wish to edit, or anyone shares this concern, here are the exact strings to copy for the emojis:

       
          
      ![ukkk](https://chapo.chat/pictrs/image/8e576036-161c-4678-b17e-788d18d142c0.png "emoji ukkk") defederate
      
      ![england-cool](https://chapo.chat/pictrs/image/5b234376-77a6-49ae-be21-f972a70e2a04.png "emoji england-cool") bans
      
        
  • if they defederate from us for being pro-trans, that looks worse for them than us preemptively defederating. Now we know to agitate around that specific issue and it's a good time to confront britishers in their home threads. I'm fine either way but think we could do something funny which makes them show their ass+hair more.

  • We defeded from blahaj.zone for the same reason. It would be pretty hypocritical to stay federated with them, especially since the transphobia

    is even worse. There’s just no excuse for not banning someone who calls trans women "it".

  • I'm fine with defedding them because I don't recall ever seeing a non-annoying post from there (mostly just the libs and chauvinists in their Buy European comm and formerly some cryptofash comm/clout farmers that are now banned here.)

    Buuuuuuut, I will say we have very little to go on on this topic besides just bad optics and the fact that this one admin ghosted Ada for a couple days, and I think people are jumping to conclusions without really understanding the context (not all of which is even available). And even Ada is saying they will refederate if the policy is clarified to be definitely not allowing transphobia in dogwhistle form.

    There is no link to the offending comments because ada doesn't want to trigger "brigading" against anyone, even a transphobe. I don't doubt it exists and wasn't removed promptly by mods but the context would really help make this situation clearer to me (plus the transphobe deserves whatever attention they get for this)

    The feddit admins also have clarified that they at least do not intend to allow transphobia (not that this is enough on its own, but it's relevant). What they are "considering" is how to deal with this comm of theirs which has a rule that basically boils down to "bad take = downvote, heinous shit = ban/remove". The mods of that comm basically thought they could get by with just social pressure (downvotes, dunking in replies) for certain kinds of "disappointing" behavior that didn't rise to the level of instant removal.

    Now, that's lib shit, and was destined to fail after contact with bad faith bigots, fascists, etc. but they don't seem to put transphobia in that "just disappointing" category, and admins are seemingly reconsidering even allowing that comm rule to stand (in my reading of the posts) in response to the wave of transphobia brought on by the recent court ruling. I believe that is what they are saying, not what everyone here is assuming, that they are considering allowing transphobia because of the court ruling.

    I'm of the opinion that if they make the right call (that comm rule has to go, or at least can't apply to bigotry, even in dogwhistle form), we should stay fedded. We gain users from exposure to other instances and people realizing we're cool and not a boogeyman, which is good for the community, so we shouldn't defed at the drop of a hat.

    If they don't make the right call, then defed away. I won't be mad either way, they contribute very little to our instance, but its the principle of the thing, wouldn't want to punish them for ultimately growing and making the right call.

    edit: I also find it important to note there's only been like 2 or 3 mod actions from hexbear against feddit.uk users in the past 2 weeks. That's a very manageable amount, and the only instance of transphobia specifically appears to have been dealt with by feddit.uk's admins themselves (siteban)

  • I haven't interacted with that instance much but I've enjoyed their movies posts and stuff so far.

    Otherwise, I really don't know much about the issue and I'm not trans so another vote supporting what the majority of our trans comrades want is cool with me.

  • ::: spoiler Deeper Thoughts I, personally, prefer

    , because I think opportunities to educate are good and, when they fail, bullying is fun. And, the less of the fediverse we connect with, the more bigotry is allowed to fester.

    But,

    is probably the healthy direction for our corner of the fediverse. I want my comrades to feel safe and supported. I think that "we gotta consider how to interpret blatant government transphobia" is a disgusting response from the mods, and that attitude is rapidly gonna turn feddit into another nazi bar. While we can engage and oppose bigots, we cannot change another site's culture when it's being poisoned from the top. The dbzero move was funny, and correct, because that instance has an anarchist tendency, and their userbase's interests overlap with the hexbear mission. A site with an identity based on geographic happenstance does not share that overlap.

    ::: spoiler Deeper spicy problematic thoughts Honestly, props to

    . I kinda want to refederate with them; give us a fresh batch of libs to spar with, encourage them to chase the chasers out, show their trans and anarchist users what real (as in honest, not as in world) solidarity can look and feel like. They like giving tankies shit, we like giving libs shit; but I think given the political realities of the world today it might be time for a slightly bigger tent.

126 comments