Ja, ist nice. Was für mich am Anfang besonders wichtig war: Der Installer ist robust! Keine andere Distro wollte auf meinem ab Werk durch Partitionen zerschossenen Laptop starten.
Nothing I say has anything to do with who shows up, but who the organizers target and attract. As I said above, Earth Day had diverse attendee groups but one clear framing. As did, seemingly, your protest. Congrats!
Clear example, if you look at just this year's mass protests by 50501/indivisible in the US, for "Hands-Off" they had a plethora of defined goals ranging from foreign policy over trans rights to social policy. Meanwhile "No Kings" was just vaguely positioned against autocracy and Trump's regime in general.
"Hands-Off" had a global turnout estimated between "hundreds of thousands" according to international press and "three to five million" according to the organizers, while "No Kings" reached over 5 million in the US alone according to independent census.
And this is just the ones from the US that made their way over here, I could give you a dozen more crass examples of protests against the extreme right in Eastern Germany that don't even manifest because the organizers can't agree on where they stand on the Gaza conflict - which of course has nothing to do with opposing the extreme right.
Thanks! I read a few of their comments, I agree in principle, but saying Occupy Wallstreet failed because antagonizing the 1% isn't broad enough is a wild take :D
Sure, protests have organizers that do marketing/pr, logistics and the official registrations for the events. Therefore most large and significant protest movements in history are marketed with a sole purpose and can be boiled down to one topic:
Women's March= women's rights
1970 Earth Day= environment
George Floyd/BLM= police brutality
Globally it's the same, think of Fridays for Future for example.
Sure people went to Earth Day with peace flags or believing whatever but the framing of the event was clear.
Well, yeah. Be general. If I want to sell candy I don't market it to 11-year-old claustrophobic basketball players, I market it to kids.
Every specificity that is added to the movement's message scares away potential supporters that can no longer identify.
This is global though. Every fringe group wants to add their message to the masthead of every protest. The left has had this problem forever.
I've always found the idea superficial and frankly vain that planting a rainbow flag in front of your HQ would somehow label you a friend to the queer community. Talk with your actions.
Social media back then were also referred to as social NETWORKS. A network implies collaboration and interactivity, media are more linear, having a sender and a recipient.
It's called "Das perfekte Dinner", it's been on the air for 20 years and is one of those shows that defies the death of classic television.
It can appear quite boring if you come from watching things like chef's table or hell's kitchen, as there is little drama, its unscripted and it's mostly very positive and no-nonsense.
So what's the agreed-upon purpose of up- and down votes on Lemmy? Because I feel like the news of this clusterfuck of a bad business decision is technews-worthy and doesn't deserve the downvotes.
I want my bank to get on board already so I can ditch paypal