Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FA
Posts
1
Comments
111
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Remembering things is the primary purpose of the check, but sometimes how you're applying it might require an alternative skill check to make sense. Here are some examples (from https://rpgbot.net/dnd5/characters/impractical-skill-checks/ ):

     
        
    Wisdom – Consoling and counselling a creature through a crisis of faith could be done with a Wisdom (Religion) check.
    
    Charisma – Proselytizing for a faith makes more sense as a Charisma (Religion) check than a Charisma (Persuasion) check.
    
      
  • Yeah, definitely don't just stick something in, use protection. If you want to use an unknown public charge, there are USB data blocker adapters you can buy.

    You get slow charging (since the devices can't negotiate), but it's better than an infection.

  • Not everything normally needs to be saved. However, in this case it looks like the court ordered them to preserve data during discovery and they did not comply. From the article:

    Pichai, and many other employees, also testified they did not change the auto-delete setting even after they were made aware of their legal obligation to preserve evidence.

  • In 5e, the more problematic part of a paladin making holy water here is the use of 25gp worth of powdered silver in the liquid (which doesn't actually hurt them more in 5e, just in classical folklore)

  • Without any spoilers, I felt that the spider-verse movie was enjoyable on it's own. Where the plot ended was, at least to me, in a good enough spot where I was both extremely satisfied with the movie I just watched and excited for the next film.

  • It is possible that you have a bad infosec team; however, it is more likely that they need to meet outdated compliance goals (SOC 2 comes to mind here).

    Infosec is unfortunately a tricky balancing act of compliance, security, and usability.

  • It is interesting, but with weird quirks.

    It is definitely capable of responding with 🤷‍♂️, but neglects to do so in some expected areas.

    "does it use a microprocessor?" 👍 "was it invented before 1970?" 👍

    These are somewhat contradictory. No microwave in 1946-1971 could have had a microprocessor. If the answer is "sometimes yes, sometimes no" then 🤷‍♂️ is probably best.

  • Yeah, I'd agree that with sufficient iterations and clarifying remarks ChatGPT can produce something close to functional. I was mostly disagreeing with the original comment's sentiment that it could be treated like the computer on the Enterprise. While they had several plot specific flaws, the duotronic computers were generally competent and didn't need everything spelled out for them.