IncorrigibleDirigible [none/use name] @ IncorrigibleDirigible @hexbear.net Posts 0Comments 29Joined 2 wk. ago
Lol I forgot their numbering was not quite coherent. So then model trained on n versions of GTA.
Sadly it's the only real form of socialism in the US. That's how they lure the kids in. Housing, clothing, healthcare, education, food. All taken care of. Fucking tragic really. With the utter lack of class consciousness and the propagandized world views that exist in the country it's easy to sign up and feel comfortable and justified for a full 20 year career. Then they can go around and say they were in such and such branch and 99% of the time hear "Thank you for your service." in reply. It's like some nationalistic necromantic incantation.
I'm surprised it wasn't Breakin' or Joe or even Lifeforce or something. Still, good timing for sure.
Model trained on all 5 GTA games.
The concept will never sell.
As long as we're trying to pretend it's the 80s again, can we get Cannon Group films back together? I feel like it might be the right time for the return of breakdancing.
Slightly off topic but I am somewhat curious to see how they twist the little blue commies to suit a capitalist narrative since Peyo is long dead. I remember away back when my young friend's ultra Christian mom forbade him to watch the Smurfs because they were "Satanic" and "promoted the occult". She would have lost it knowing that I played D&D (this was during the height of the Satanic Panic) LOL. She completely missed the fact they were communists and Papa Smurf was basically cartoon Karl Marx (maximum cold war era too). Too bad the antisemitic and sexist tropes tarnish the whole collectivism angle. I bet his mom would have approved of THOSE parts though. Ahh, memories.
Once again Hexbears doing a great service by providing knowledge forbidden by the evil overlords. Kudos! I'm sure it will be an enlightening read.
Why do I feel like I'm back in middle/grade school and the teacher has gone M.I.A.? Can we PLEASE get some adults in the room? I'M BEGGING OVER HERE!
Yes, the categories have crossovers and the stats attempt to take those into account, as difficult as they may be to separate entirely. Transportation includes shipping across all categories and moving humans by car, plane, etc. I am certainly NOT advocating eating meat or anything remotely like that. I DO want to make accurate statements and have others get accurate info.
I was simply going by impact assessments of impact by industry types, obviously nothing happens in a vacuum. This is why I said there is room to reassess impacts. The stats that I was referring to try to take into account overall usage, pollution and other factors. Everything is linked in systems which is why it's difficult to get perfectly accurate pictures of things yet it IS possible to have a decent set of data to guide decision making on how to best course correct. Moving to renewables, building housing made to last generations instead of 20 years, public transportation powered by said renewables, reducing/eliminating meat consumption, growing locally, banning single use plastics etc.
I know the ethical and moral considerations are important. I agree with animal liberation entirely. I just take issue with presenting animal agriculture as THE single most damaging environmental practice, which it just isn't. Being factually accurate is important and misrepresenting the issue is harmful to the overall cause of environmental justice.
While I don't disagree about animal farming being terrible, it's impact is significant but not the top of the list by any means. Energy production dwarfs all other polluters by a large margin. 75% of greenhouse gas emissions and tons of toxic pollution. Construction is next because of all the toxic byproducts. Transportation is also worse. Agri-industry accounts for around 15% of GHG with a lot of pollution generated from food packaging. After that it's the fashion industry. While there is definitely some room for reassessing the impacts due to methodology, it's a roughly accurate list.
Not trying to minimize, just contextualize.
Compromise with a loincloth?
Ahh, well that makes a bit more sense. Definitely weird out of context, lol!
I never tire of people setting passwords to "password" level hacks.
I really don't know. Possibly. Rebranding soup as "water based cooking" just somehow filled me with a nameless existential dread.
I feel like this needs a special kind of content warning all it's own.
I feel the need to edit an autoexec.bat now.
I....errr....umm...SMDH.