Critical_Thinker @ Critical_Thinker @lemm.ee Posts 0Comments 180Joined 4 mo. ago
The thing is if you're going into the situation to date them you're doing it wrong.
I'm literally saying go in and treat them like human beings, just like you'd treat anybody. The point is not to go in with the mentality of sleeping with them. The point is to go in making friends. Romance comes naturally just by interacting with single people in social settings.
This is the disconnect. I'm saying do not go in to sleep with them, and you are thinking it as the objective behind all of it. Sure, maybe, if it happens great, but that's not the point. I went to meetups like that when I was single because they were fun and got me out from thinking about the problems of life, exes and work. It got me into all kinds of events I never would have gone to if I were not in those circles.
I can't imagine going out with the objective of finding someone to date. That's creepy and manipulative, just like you're saying. This is why people lecture you, because you're not trying to make friends - you're just looking to fuck.
Games and manipulation? what the fuck are you talking about?
It's about hanging out with people in a non dating scenario, getting to know them, then seeing if they are interested after you both know each other a bit. You don't go in cold. You don't try to "pick up" women this way, this is a way to meet all kinds of people in a neutral setting with no strings attached for anyone. It's like a safe fucking space and if someone you find attractive gives you the eyes or invites you out on the side it can work. I know. I almost married a girl who invited me to her place for food 1:1 after a few board game meetups. I wasn't going there for the fucking women, I went for friends and fun.
By being in a group social scenario everyone is expecting to socialize and meet new people. You're sharing an interest, which means you're likely to be friends anyway and at least compatible on a social level - and the non-sexual components of relationships are basically the only fucking ones that matter long term. Shared values and shared interests are what make relationships work. Sexual attraction doesn't keep a marriage going when your 2 year old is up screaming at 2am because your 2 month old infant woke up for a feeding.
But anyway, keep spouting your weirdo white knight shit about how just talking to women like human beings is bad. The problem is you. It's not normal to think about harassing women when you're going in to simply meet and get to know people.
"Everything is everyone else's fault! Why can't everyone see that my way is better for me and my interests?!?!?!"
Sorry donnie, we do see it.
If you're approaching strangers and asking them for a date and you aren't an adonis, wealthy or otherwise instantly recognizable in a positive way, you're gonna get some real negative responses. No one wants some rando just asking them out, but this is not new, this is why if you go to a bar you have a wing man - being solo looks creepy.
It's true though that I wouldn't have dated women who are 28 or younger (seems to be the oldest of gen Z.) I'm 40. Even though i'm of another generation it's basically been a 10% chance or less to approach someone and ask them out... but again if you don't try it never happens. Most people are in a relationship ALL the time... the best relationships i've found have been by making friends first in real world circumstances (board game meetups, parties, work functions/events, hiking meetups, running meetups... you name it..) and then being friendly and literally making friends with people. If you click with someone you can literally feel it, and if you like them enough then after you're already at least friendly acquaintances you ask them to something.
If you can't ever make friends at a meetup or event, especially one that invites strangers and often has newcomers, the problem is you.
Pichai kissed the ring. He's colluding with the person who tried to overturn the elections and install himself as a ruler.
All of the billionaires that were at the inauguration are in the same boat. I'm at a point where I believe the crimes of any of them should be tried and convicted with the punishments being doled out collectively to all colluders, but that's me.
I'd be going for the death penalty from the prosecution side, since it seems like that is what we do now to people who cause one or more people to die, no matter how unethical the victim(s) were.
They do not understand and the understanding they have has been formed with propaganda for decades.
American politics has been so far from it's idealistic roots in democracy and supplanted by the wealthy for decades if not a century or longer. Allowing businesses to fund campaigns openly in the 70s has to have been a big tipping point and why we have allowed it is bizarre to me. We have basically no media today that isn't highly politicized one way or another. Bezos has altered his media to fit whatever party furthers it's business goals... like most oligarch owned businesses following suit whether or not they are media.
I don't think things can be changed anymore though. I think pandora's box opened at some point and it can't be shut again without tearing civilization down.
If every individual you approach gives you a lecture you might want to check out not being around those people. Try something different.
I've never, ever gotten a lecture. I've been married for about four years, but before the pandemic I picked up 4 women in a year that led to relationships of months before I ended them when I realized there wasn't enough there to keep me interested. Don't get me wrong, i've been dumped plenty and rejected plenty. I just learned to move on from the rejection.
It's like job hunting, it's a numbers game and every time you try you have a chance. Every time you don't try nothing changes.
I just can't imagine being lectured just by approaching someone and saying hi, asking them a question that is pertinent to the scenario, and giving them a chance to speak.
I just disagree that they had it so good.
Modern technology like cell phones, computers, medicines and treatments have upended how things work. Imagine how hard it would be to go to a college or university and not have access to google or reddit. Or how hard it would be to have to type up multiple copies of everything instead of just sending an email with multiple recipients.
MMR vaccines starting with measles in 63, mumps in 67 and rubella in 69, Polio in 55-61ish, Haemophilus influenzae type b '85. Anyone who is a boomer lived in a period where these things were still a problem in day to day lives.
Their car crashes resulted in fatalities. Ours are generally minor injuries in comparison. The way cars are designed have changed.
They had one or two power outlets per room, if any at all. They didn't have much insulation, let alone sound proofing.
They had to pay a commission to a travel agent to go on vacation, they couldn't just look things up for themselves and had to rely on friends or the agent as to how it is.
If you wanted to look something up you had to go to a library.
Few actually owned multiple cars. Growing up in a middle class household in the 80s we had a single car and our family vacation was camping.
There was a constant threat of nuclear war.
Air travel for a long, long time was exclusively reserved for the wealthy and those in business.
Labor laws, as few as we have today, were even worse.
By the time computers came around they were too old to actually partake by and large. My boomer grandparents (because that's the actual boomer age now in their 80s) are dying or are dead and they've never had a cell phone.
Easy to access jobs, homes, boats, cars with little to no education or financial acumen. Just that “walk in and hand them a resume” trope they love to perpetuate.
It's never been that easy! It's always been easy to find a job that pays for a room, but much more is a luxury for so many. There's obviously exceptions but I see loads of people making >200k today without advanced degrees. Anybody who got into programming ~4+ years ago is living like a king today by comparison to most of the 'middle class' in the 50s, 60s, 70s or 80s.
They paid in cash per TFA
So walk away from them, or handle it gracefully somehow. It's the same as trying to make a friend. Doesn't everyone make friends from time to time?
Interest + effort = relationship of any kind. Find the shared interest, make a little bit of effort.... or don't and the math doesn't work. If romance doesn't come, you've made a friend.
You've drank too much ideological koolaid. People aren't what you read in the news or a great deal of the internet.
It's actually really easy to get a date in person if you are not a total ogre and treat women like normal people.
Weirdo white knights can easily end up as incels. Neither of those groups tend to do very well in actual social situations.
Better off with Spanish my friend. Many more scenarios where Spanish is useful and English is unusable than with french speaking areas. I am biased though, i've worked for french companies and my wife natively speaks Spanish.
So do you expect self driving tech to override human action? or do you expect human action to override self driving tech?
I expect the human to override the system, not the other way around. Nobody claims to have a system that requires no human input, aside from limited and experimental implementations that are not road legal nationwide. I kind of expect human input to override the robot given the fear of robots making mistakes despite the humans behind them getting into them drunk and holding down the throttle until they turn motorcyclists into red mist. But that's my assumption.
With the boca one specifically, the guy got in his car inebriated. That was the first mistake that caused the problem that should never have happened. If the car was truly self driving automated and had no user input, this wouldn't have happened. It wouldn't have gone nearly 2.5x the speed limit. It would have braked long in advance before hitting someone in the road.
I have a ninja 650. We all know the danger comes from things we cannot control, such as others. I'd trust an actually automated car over a human driver always, even with limited modern tech. The second the user gets an input though? zero trust.
FTFA:
Certain Tesla self-driving technologies are speed capped, but others are not. Simply pressing the accelerator will raise your speed in certain modes, and as we saw in the police filings from the Washington State case, pressing the accelerator also cancels emergency braking.
That’s how you would strike a motorcyclist at such extreme speed, simply press the accelerator and all other inputs are apparently overridden.
If the guy smashes the gas, just like in cruise control I would not expect the vehicle to stop itself.
The guy admitted to being intoxicted and held the gas down... what's the self driving contribution to that?
Did I ask a terrible question, or do you just not like anything being objective about the issue? I'm so far over on the left side ideologically that you'd be hard pressed finding an issue that i'm conservative on. I don't fit the dem mold though, i'm more of a bernie.... though I am very critical in general. I don't just take things at face value. Anywho...
Saying that the statistics aren't great just lends credence to the fact that we can't objectively determine how safe or unsafe anything is without good data.
Let's get this out of the way: Felon Musk is a nazi asshole.
Anyway, It should be criminal to do these comparisons without showing human drivers statistics for reference. I'm so sick of articles that leave out hard data. Show me deaths per billion miles driven for tesla, competitors, and humans.
Then there's shit like the boca raton crash, where they mention the car going 100 in a 45 and killing a motorcyclist, and then go on to say the only way to do that is to physically use the gas pedal and that it disables emergency breaking. Is it really a self driving car at that point when a user must actively engage to disable portions of the automation? If you take an action to override stopping, it's not self driving. Stopping is a key function of how self driving tech self drives. It's not like the car swerved to another lane and nailed someone, the driver literally did this.
Bottom line I look at the media around self driving tech as sensationalist. Danger drives clicks. Felon Musk is a nazi asshole, but self driving tech isn't made by the guy. it's made by engineers. I wouldn't buy a tesla unless he has no stake in the business, but I do believe people are far more dangerous behind the wheel in basically all typical driving scenarios.
It's because the wealthy run things, and the victim was wealthy.
Game, set and match.
There's no content. It's just a fake family generation simulator.
cause meet effect
I can't believe investors were OK with him selling twitter to another company he co-owns.
feed her stew made by a blind person's hair for 1 day