Look at you doing your revisionist history.
The conversation was that pretending Biden was worse than Trump on this issue was propaganda designed to elect Trump. So in that regards, you totally won. You worked hard and helped get Trump elected.
Good job empowering the right and setting back the leftist agenda. Stellar work that I do not expect any leftist to acknowledge because it's not a movement of personal responsibility.
They go center when the voters go right.
A protest non-vote doesn't move policy.
People who always vote for a Republicans or Democrats eventually get what they want. Blaming either of the parties for following the will of those who actual vote is childish.
Hating the democrats will not get you more progressive policy, no mater how much youthful exuberance you have.
Hopefully one day, you'll realize it's not your ball so you can't take home with you. You can only play the game that everyone else is playing or sit on the sidelines and fantasize.
Not a meteorologist but my understanding of the climate there, is that it is desert or close to it because of the topology. Very very windy where it isn't mountains.
And because I cannot try and know, this indicates it's going in the wrong direction.
Except for the whole lack of water problem they've got.
They are the ones that talk to the customers so the engineers don't have to.
Often those customers are others in the same company.
So it's like monopoly house rules which only serve to extend the time the game takes and then no one wants to play because it takes too long.
Click bait articles have a habit of over emphasizing things to garner attention. Hence why I suggested it was a marketing ploy.
NPCs? Yikes.
Who actually plays it that wrong way, allowing stacking of +4 and instead of taking four and being skipped you place and +2 and the next person get six?
The rules are not ambiguous. This sounds like a silly "house rule" at best with clever marketing being more likely.
As opposed to you because you are not tribal and never make emotional decisions.
Reducing people like this is itself an emotional defense mechanism. We are fallible to the things you describe. All political bubbles have people who make this same exact claim about all the other bubbles.
There intelligence in recognizing this. Neither you nor I are in the one true bubble.
If you presented your ideas on mathematics that are above your understanding level, you'd be called out on the same way.
No, banning people is silencing them. If they were replying with "Veganism rules, carnist drool" we would be discussing this here and that would be the equivalent you have described.
Stupid people don't like people smarter than them. Being stupid is a choice. An active choice reaffirmed daily.
We need to stop pretending it's not a choice.
We need to start recognizing it's a threat to society. Doing otherwise is acting stupid.
I heard he smoked the marijuana once!
I too am proud about things I did nothing to be.
Should have paved over those mountains.
Can't have a fire if the landscape is one continuous piece of asphalt.
Based on many of the other comments, I don't think most people understood the joke.
What exactly do you think the vm is running on if not the system kernel with potentially more layers.
The container should always be updated to march production. In a non-container environment every developer has to do this independently but with containers it only has to be done once and then the developers pull the update which is a git style diff.
Best practice is to have the people who update the production servers be responsible for updating the containers, assuming they aren't deploying the containers directly.
It's essentinally no different than updating multiple servers, except one of those servers is then committed to a local container respository.
This also means there are snapshots of each update which can be useful in its own way.