BurnedDonutHole @ BurnedDonutHole @ani.social

Posts

0

Comments

34

Joined

1 yr. ago

I would like to clarify something so that there won't be any misunderstandings. Law doesn't require distribution or intent to distribute. Copying a copyrighted material without proper approval or license is enough. Which is what he did.

Below is the related section from the US Copyright Law, under section 506 Titled "Criminal Offences":

(B) by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000; or

As you can see they didn't need his intentions to distribute it was a factor used not required. I hope I made it clear about why I don't think it was because if his beliefs.

I wish you well.

I respect your opinion and let me say that I agree that his beliefs played a role but he wasn't punished harshly because of his beliefs. He was made an example not because of his beliefs but because the people in charge at the time wanted to show that they are in control. You feeling strongly about how the prosecution put together their remarks and how they used his own remarks against him I understand. (I'll tell you that I'm a lawyer with over 20 years of experience you want to believe me or not is up to you.) But I can tell you if they were doing it just because of his beliefs they could've charged him for each and every copyrighted material he downloaded from the servers. Considering he downloaded gigabytes of material in mostly text format they could've went an charge him for each and everyone of those. Just by doing that they could have easily finish his life with thousands of years of prison sentence and charge him hundreds of millions in monetary damages. Instead they turned it into one big case. You can check the law and see if it's possible or not. In the end let's agree to disagree. I wish you well and I hope that he is in peace.

Nope! They made an example of because they didn't know how to deal with internet crimes so they decided he will be the scapegoat for their failures even though they knew his so called crimes didn't require such harsh punishment. They went after him so hard to make an example out of him to warn others. If you think they did it because of his beliefs you're doing injustice to what he went through.

It doesn't matter what he believed. They wanted to make an example of him and build their carriers thanks to that example. The only people they went after this hard were Julian Assange and Edward Snowden.

Are you telling me there is a secret number of clicks for each error? Ohhh boy why didn't I learned this before!

It seems you come here without reading anything and with your preconceived notions that I'll listen to you.

I almost choked on my beer ahahahahah

I see I'm not alone. But I drink tea like a civilized person.

That escalated quickly...

～(つˆ0ˆ)つ｡☆

WTF indeed. I'm guessing someone messed up the original images and these went to the print or this is a book from alternate one of the dimensions.

You're fighting a strawman you made up buddy. I'm talking about his own and how he acted. If you don't like it I suggest you check yourself and let me know if I was misleading about my claims.

I don't think you understood what I'm saying. My gripe/problem/feud/issue is about people who are miserable in their marriage but they will always be there to sell their shitty marriage like it's a golden ticket out of anything and everything If you follow their shitty steps.

If you have a happy marriage (not you personally) I salute you and your partner and I have nothing to say.

I'm mature enough to know that anything and everything that involves 2 people in any amount of time would have some difficulties.

But that doesn't change the fact that people whom are trying to sell you on marriage 99% of the time are the ones that have shitty marriages.

I didn't say anything bad about his recent statements. I've yet to see anything real and tangible from his alleged efforts. While he was happy to accept such grants of doing nothing with joy. To me he is nothing but a TV personality and nothing about him is genuine. He literally did a Trump move on his latest interview where he asked the TV reporter what percentage is paying inheritance tax and she said 4% and he run with 96% of the people is having difficulties and shit. And when the same reporter asked where he get his numbers he asked his lackeys who is not effected? He is in my eyes nothing but an attention seeking bastard. Because he is talking loud but doing nothing real.

It seems you're ignorant of what greed is...

Well who am I to disagree with you? Bone broth it's...

So if I'm understanding correctly if I season right I can eat anything and everything including you?

Silver lining: he is honest. I'll take an honest hate over BS niceties.

Same as people who got married and miserable always asking you when you're going to get married.

Yeah they would have a legitimate animosity if people know how good they taste?