Aceticon @ Aceticon @lemmy.dbzer0.com Posts 0Comments 1,008Joined 5 mo. ago
This being a totally different legal jurisdiction makes the whole thing nothing more that an empty threat and pretty sad attempt at bullying, which can be safelly ignored which is exactly what the Stockholm authorities are doing.
That would only make sense if "Americans support us" was seen by people as a positive, and I think we're well pass the stage were people in Europe look up to America and Americans.
Nowadays an endorsment by America and Americans is more likely to tank and idea than to prop it up.
PS: That said, the current US Administration seems totally oblivious to the state of "Brand America" abroad - just notice how Trump with his "support" sunk the Conservatives in Canada and helped sink them in Australia - so it actually makes sense that they think that "Americans support us" is some kind of help they would be giving to the far-right abroad.
The entire raison d'etre of Neoliberalism was to reduce the Power of the State (and hence the power of voters, who elect who controls it) below the Power of Money - leaving just about everything to "the Market" with "non-interventionism" and "deregulation" is really just another way to say that the State should not exercise any power over Money and thus leave Money to be the highest Power.
In other words, Democracy has been destroyed, not by wars or revolutions but by being hallowed out into a meaningless performance (the vote) for control of a lesser power, all thanks to Corruption, Propaganda and Subversion by insiders.
It feels like Feudalism because it is Feudalism, just with better image management.
I'm still using the 2018 Substance, which is the last one for which there was a proper license (which I have). Then Adobe bought the Allegorithmict and turned that suite into a subscription application.
Still works fine and apparently the software hasn't significantly improved ever since it turned into a subscription.
By the way, cheers for mentioning PBR Painter - I added it to my list of possible replacements.
Copyright if elements of the game such as 3D models, images and code have been copied.
Trademark if the name of the game is used (i.e. "Stardew Valley Romance Sims").
Patents for game mechanics.
As a side note, personally I think that game mechanics shouldn't be at all patentable
Any live TV - were I live they all show the same ads.
Actually I think it's worse: human salesmen cost money whilst this shit is mainly automated or uses distribution systems were one person presses a button and millions get exposed to it (for example TV), so the numbers involved and the relentlessness of the pestering is far, far larger in scale than if human salesmen were doing it.
Nah, at least Spain and the Republic Of Ireland are vociferously against this shit.
The pro-Genocide nations in Europe are Germany and and Britain, with to a lesser extent The Netherlands, though most of the others are in practice turning a blind eye to it.
Have a look at Perfume adverts on TV: they are literally entirely made up of imagery meant to make one think about sex and being sexy, with not a single thing in any of them about the actual quality of the product.
Car adverts too are similar, but their imagery is about things like Freedom, Family, Friendship, Party, Joy and so on (depending on the car). Almost none of them talks about the qualities of the actual vehicle.
Adverts not relying in this kind of psychological manipulation are the ones which look a lot like 1950s adverts and talk about the actual qualities of the product.
Under-investment into training advertising creatieves doesn't mean that the adverts aren't using Psychology tricks anymore because that way of doing adverts is now so widespread and common in the industry (because it works!) that people just learn those things as tricks of the trade rather than needing any kind of special extra training in Psychology.
Wait, wait, wait: what the fuck is that format of news program.
Are "man doing bad jokes and woman doing fake performative laughs" standard in news programs over there or are these people just especially incompetent?!
That stuff was seriously cringe.
With modern advertising techniques, adverts mainly work by psychological manipulation - putting a name in your mind, making you associate it with an emotion (for example cars are "freedom", perfume is "lust"), induce fear of a non-existing problem and then sell you a "solution" and so on.
It's like being the focus of a crowd of untiring salesmen who are slick manipulators with training in Psychology and with no ethics at all.
That's how it is every day in every place (even the comfort of your own home) in the advert heavy world we live in if one doesn't fight to keep that shit away.
Israel is doing a modern version of the Holocaust.
Well, after my first crash and being out of a job for 6 months because of it, I've always been very prepared for that kind of situation so when Lehman Brothers went down I was just fine because I had plenty of savings (and was even asked back after a month because the division I was working with was bought by a Japanese Brokerage and remained operating) and similary when Leave won, not only had I "just in case" financially protected my savings from the hit on the British Pound if Leave won, but I could and did chose to leave Britain before the actual Leave date because I expected that country to increasingly suffer from the effects of leaving the EU.
So in a way, after the first one it wasn't too bad.
Look, I'm extrapolating from the general rule to the specific case of torrenting.
The general rule is that, because the IP protocol requires numerical addresses to connect to a remote machine, if what you have is a site name you have to translate that name into a numerical address before you can actually establish a connection, and a DNS query is how you translate site names into their numerical IP addresses.
Now, if you look at the contents of a tracker, what you see are not numerical addresses but site names, so those must be translated into numerical addresses before your client can connect to those trackers, hence DNS queries are done to do that translation.
Meanwhile, if you look at the "peers" section in an active torrent in your torrenting program, you see that they all have numerical IP addresses, not site names. This makes sense for two reasons:
- Most of those machines are user machines, and usually users don't just buy a domain to have site names for the machines they used only as clients (i.e. browsing, torrenting and so on) since that is not at all needed. Site names are required for machines which serve stuff (literally, "server machines", such as machines hosting websites) to arbitrary clients that by their own initiative connect to that machine - they're meant as a human readable memorable alias for the numerical IP address of a machine, which people can enter in appropriate fields of client applications to connect to that site (i.e. putting "lemmy.dbzer0.com" in your browser rather than having to remember that its IP address is "51.77.203.116")
- As I said, IP connections require IP numerical addresses to be established. For performance reasons it makes sense that in the torrent protocol the information exchanged about peers and between peers is always and only the machine's numerical IP address since with those there is no need to do the additional step which is the DNS query before they can be used by the networking layer to open TCP/IP or UDP/IP connections to those peers.
Hence my conclusion is that the torrenting protocol itself will only deal with site names (which require DNS queries before network connections can be made to them) for the entrance into the protocol (i.e. start up and connect to trackers) and then deal with everything else using numerical IP addresses only, both because almost no peer will actually have a site name and because it's low performance and doesn't make sense to get site names from peers and have to resolve those into numerical addresses when then peer itself already knows its numerical address and can directly provide it. Certainly that's how I would design it.
Now, since I didn't actually read the protocol or logged the network connections in a machine torrenting to see what's going one, I'm not absolutely certain there are now DNS queries at all after the initial resolution of the trackers of a torrent. I am however confident that it is so because that makes sense from a programming point of view.
Well, if the trackers are specified as names (and a quick peek at some random torrent shows that most if not all all), those do have to be resolved to IP adresses and if that DNS query is happening outside the VPN then your ISP as well as the DNS server being queried can see you're interest in those names (and it wouldn't be hard to determine with a high probability that you are indeed torrenting something, though WHAT you are torrenting can't really be determined by you merely accessing certain servers which have torrent trackers active, unless a specific server only tracks a single torrent, which would be pretty weird).
Things like peers aren't DNS resolved since they already come as IP adresses.
So when it comes to torrenting as far as I know all that the DNS can leak is the information that you ARE torrenting but not specifically WHAT you are torrenting.
It's more in things were you're constantly doing DNS queries, such as browsing, that DNS leaking can endanger you privacy: if for example somebody is going to "hotsheepbestialityporn.com", somebody at their ISP could determine that person's very specific sexual tastes from seeing the DNS queries for hotsheepbestialityporn.com coming in the open from their connection.
I was working in Tech when the Tech Crash in 99 happened, working in the only large Investment bank that went bankrupt in the 2008 Crash and living in Britain when Brexit won the Leave Referendum.
average pro Russia tanky
Oh no, these guys are really old fashioned Marxist-Leninists and at some point they even admitted to being Stalinists.
They're not the thinking kind of Lefties who might just be against war out of principle, they're just heavily indoctrinated types in a very specific prepackaged ideology that claims to be Leftwing - basically they're "Left"wing MAGAs.
The tankie stereotype is in fact real - rare, but real.
It might be a DNS problem.
I vaguely remember that Mullvad has a setting to make sure that DNS queries go via the VPN but maybe that's not enabled in your environment?!
Another possibility is that Mullvad going down and then back up along with your physical connection when your ISP forces a renewal of the DHCP is somehow crapping up the DNS client on your side.
If you have the numerical IP address of a site, you can try and access the site by name in your browser when you have problems in the morning and then try it by nunerical IP address - if it doesn't work by name but it does by numerical IP it's probably a DNS issue.
PS: you can just run the "ping" command from the command line to see if your machinr can reach a remote machine (i.e. "ping lemmy.dbzer0.com") and don't need to use a browser (in fact for checking if you can reach machines without a webserver, the browser won't work but the ping command will).
Even if Mullvad did erroneously allow applications to access your physical network connection for a moment, because you bound qbittorrent explicitly to the network device of the Mullvad VPN, qbittorrent will never use the physical connection.
You can check this out easily by disconnecting Mullvad and trying to torrent something on qbittorrent and also browsing the Net: you'll notice the browser gets through just fine but qbittorrent will not.
Mullvad leaking would be a problem if what you're worried about is loss of privacy or government surveillance, not for torrenting if your torrent server is correctly bound to the VPN device.