Tax the rich
Tax the rich
77 comments
-
-
SEE, PIRACY IS KILLING THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY!
That could have been a 100 million or even 200 million compensation package. Oh that poor.... POOR guy. What have we done?
-
Clearly we have not been good enough pirates. Time to sail the high seas!
-
-
Purée the rich
-
Tax the rich, violence isn't the right choice
-
The rich own the people that decide taxes. They own the media that influences the masses. In many cases, they even own the prisons thereby giving them incentive to "encourage" lawmakers to make more stringent laws to put more citizens in prison. The rich own everything. Our entire culture is rigged to give them more money and more power. The only advantage we have is numbers. Sometimes, violence is the only choice. They certainly wouldn't hesitate to use it against you. They would just get the "authorities" to do it for them.
-
Rare sane Lemmy comment
-
How about police violence? That's an american problem, but it's getting worse and nothing is stopping it.
Laws don't affect them. How do you want to solve it?
-
-
-
The only thing I ever hear about David Zaslav is how he's a notorious piece of shit who only makes terrible decisions about how to further ruin the reputation of his company. That, and now about how he's getting a huge raise.
-
I hope this is true, because the bullshit we are fed is that they earn those incomes by their performance. This would be an obvious slap in the face for that argument.
I know it's all bullshit, but it's nice to have direct evidence that it's bullshit.
-
-
Noted that this is the face of the person who ruined the lives of my friends and former coworkers. In case anyone doesn't know, everything Rooster Teeth will be vanishing in like 2 weeks thanks to Warner Brothers. I finally get my dream job as a Production Designer on Simple Walk into Mordor, then this...
-
I don’t get the headline.
-
Stretching here, maybe trying to imply the raise comes due to cutting jobs or raises of lower level employees.
-
He can give himself a 25% raise worth several tens of millions of dollars which he made thanks to the hard work of the employees at WB, but these employees get next to nothing during a time where every basic needs like food and shelter are increasingly expensive.
A big part of that money should go to the employees.
-
I understood it to be mocking the headline's passive tone. The CEO is the one with much of the power to increase their own pay in a company, but the article is talking about it like some unknown magical entity just gifted this guy with $50 million.
And I think it's also combined with the general sentiment that anyone making that much is stealing from workers.
-
The only issue with that is there is a corporate board and shareholders (only non-binding votes to show approval or displeasure i read in the nyt piece), but cant say you're not wrong either in terms of the board. And maybe something to do with this:
Pay packages like these — when entertainment companies have been walloped by the shift to streaming from traditional television — played a major role in the union strikes. “They plead poverty, that they’re losing money left and right when giving hundreds of millions of dollars to their C.E.O.s,” Fran Drescher, the president of the actors’ union, said at July rally. “It is disgusting.”
Most of the big media companies slashed costs in 2023, laying off thousands of people and announcing plans to make fewer movies and television shows. But Mr. Zaslav and his lieutenants have been particularly aggressive, even shelving nearly finished content like “Batgirl” and “Coyote vs. Acme.” https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/19/business/media/david-zaslav-pay-package.html
-
-
From a communist lens, the money to give the CEO a raise is the value of labor that workers provided, taken by the CEO instead of shared among the workers who provided it.
So (from that lens) the money going to the CEO is being stolen from the workers, the money is the car in the analogy. But the headline is framing the situation as "X got this thing worth a lot" without considering where the value came from.
Workers whose labor value have been stolen are like a person whose car was stolen, waking up to a positively-framed article about someone else receiving the stolen goods.
-
I think someone misinterpreted the Discovery network name, thinking it meant he found it. That was my initial impression.
-
No, it's most likely about the layoffs and pay cuts the companies do to their employees to give themselves a raise.
-
No, he is the CEO of the company "Warner Bros. Discovery" from a quick google. I think it's just unfamiliar to see someone's pay increase retroactively, since it literally doesn't happen for normal people.
-
-
I could def be wrong, but it might have to do with Zaslav's 'vision' to move focus towards 'unscripted programming', as in reality tv, true crime and live sports, less on scripted programming. My guess* is the car that's laying about is reality tv and regular people. He's not really helping create new shows, great storytelling, rather just using regular people to draw in viewers and rake in profits. I imagine the cost of unscripted programming is much less than truly scripted programming.
-
Yeah, that got me too
-
-
-
It'd take a revolution to get to tax the billionaires. Why stop at "tax"?
-
We have moved well beyond the taxing stage. We need a giant wood chipper
-
Wood chippers require energy and can be expensive. A guillotine is rather easy to make, requires no electricity and is easy to build from things at hand for everyone.
-
"Let go of the foot!" 🔫
Sees whose foot it is
"Ah, never mind. Carry on!"
-
Yeah, guillotines are too quick and clean. Wood chipper, starting with the feet.
-
Yeah, guillotines are too quick and clean. Wood chipper, starting with the feet.
-
-
The level of inequality in the world makes me want to die. I'm not enough of a dick, and I'm kind of a dick. I don't want to be part of it, it's horrible.
-
Imagine "Discovering" somebody's bank account
-
Kris Straub drew me a cross between an Ent as a Vulcan once
77 comments
It’s an addiction in the most literal sense of the word. Going after money is the most default of all possible goals, so it’s a way to avoid facing choices in life.
Money’s numerical, which means you can always in theory make a decision without having to think or feel. Bigger number = better choice.
Just like cocaine or video games or jerking off, it’s a way to get dopamine flowing without figuring anything out.
I’ve found that any time I actually emerge from poverty, I encounter a deep existential dread that’s basically covered up by the struggle. Because I don’t know what my next goal is after getting out of the pit.
So my subconscious finds a way to just fall back into the pit.
One solution to this is to view “more money” with the same urgency no matter how financially secure I am.
I don’t seem to be capable of that. I know it would be handy in some ways to be driven to always rise on the money ladder, but the thought of trying to awaken and cultivate that pattern in myself feels like more of a cost than a benefit.
Virtually every single thing I stress about in my life is in one way or another related to money. It's not spending money I'm into - it's having it. I have way more money saved up than anyone else I know but I still want more. You can call it an addiction but it's what gives me the peace of mind. 1 million euros is the number I have in mind about how much I'd need to have money saved up untill I would consider it enough. I'm nowhere even close that amount so it's safe to assume that money is going to remain among the top priorities for the rest of my life.
save the world. good goal.
might not fix your anxiety,but will give you something fun to do.
Buy politicians so they can do more shit to make more money. Money is the end game
Mansions, supercars, yachts, maids, private chefs, expensive trips in their private airplanes. Those are the things that at least make sense. But then they start doing really stupid stuff like spending $45,000 for a light fixture in their house when most people have light fixtures that cost a hundred bucks. They buy T-shirts that cost $1200 just because of the label. They literally eat gold on $20,000 deserts that are powdered with gold dust and gold flake. They get bored of having everything they could ever want and start acting like fucking idiots. A normal person that has already had every single desire they've ever had met would start looking to benefit the less fortunate. Not these fucks. Instead they put diamonds on the soles of their shoes and pursue even more money that they'll never be able to spend.
Somewhat unrelated, but "Diamonds on the Soles of Her Shoes" from Paul Simon is a fucking banger
And then you've got Warren Buffet who just was really into it as a high score competition living in a house he bought 40 years ago driving a 8 year old car
You think that's a lot, our brains can't even comprehend how much 200 billion actually is (bozos and tusk)
It takes this ceo 4000 years to earn 200 billion
Best explanation for the difference between a million and a billion: a million seconds is 12 days, a billion seconds is 31 years.
While we are angry at the guys who maybe stole a few months, there are people who have stolen centuries and millenias. The warner CEO is closer to being homeless, than being a billionaire (though neither is realistic).
Net worth is not the same as money in the bank.
they buy politicians, buy things that make them more money, custom artisinal services, etc
Brag about it and use it as leverage for power. The money doesn't actually exist, it's stock mostly that gets instantly created from nothing. But they can use the idea of its existence to take other people's real money for the things they want and the rest is just other people agreeing to do what they want because of the idea of power that having it conveys.
Haven't you heard? They create jobs with it! So many jobs! (/s)
Oh littlest butler, you're the butler who butlers our hearts~