It’s important to note that the court has not actually (yet) found that Israel is committing genocide. It’s just said to Israel "hey, while this case is ongoing, make sure no genocides happen, k?" It’s more similar to a temporary injunction that a court might make against a company during a civil suit, because the court finds it plausible that they might end up needing to make a ruling against them.
It’s a bunch of bullshit, and the fact that the articles about it completely ignore what’s going on just showcases that nobody has prepared themselves for the Holocaust II to happen with the Nazis carrying around Tiktok on phones.
It's a bunch of bullshit, and the fact that the articles about it completely ignore what's going on just showcases that nobody has prepared themselves for the Holocaust II to happen with the Nazis carrying around Tiktok on phones.
This is about media criticism of the articles published during this time which all use overt misdirection to cover up the events taking place in court
You're the ones gassing yourself up over headlines existing.
That's all you little pseudointellectuals care about, as long as the Good Neutral Newspapers of Record have a headline about a thing, you think it isn't omitting anything.
You wouldn't care about what is omitted after the headlines because they are a security blanket to you 🤡🎪🎪
I will have a laptop and shit and be finished moving in a month then you are all really in for it on shitjustworks and dbzero and lemmy and lemmee hahahahh
Who gives a shit? This is about media criticism of the articles published during this time which all use overt misdirection to cover up the events taking place in court