They're reducing the election of a free market extremist in Argentina into "haha libertarians are pedos" jokes.
Indeed, the people most likely to be welcoming to them are market radicals and if your worldview revolves around "everything must be allowed", then legalizing that is likely to happen.
When I was in grad school, my advisor used to respond to any question that began "Imagine a possible world where.." by just stopping the questioner and saying *no, I'd rather not."
Imagine the american president is 100 years old and dying of dementia. His last wish is one more genocide. Is it ethical for the Zionist Entity to do one?
Reality has a radical bias so you can't really rely too heavily on it to argue for reactionary ideas. Instead they construct elaborate thought experiments and try to reason themselves into the position they want to arrive at from first principles. Being disingenuous jackasses that reasoning always ends up being deceptive and irrational.
Good point, a lot of the most hardcore "true believers" in this stuff are extremely good at rationalising their own shitty behaviour and making themselves feel like they've "figured it out" when all they really did was find a bunch of vaguely intelligent sounding excuses.
Liberals justifying their ideology: Imagine this hypothetical situation that has not happened and, even if it does happen, will always remain a weird anecdotal outlying edgecase. In this situation, would you agree with me?
Once the congress of the youth wing of the far right libertarian party LA passed a resolution calling for the legalization of necrophilia and consensual cannibalism. Libertarians are freaks.