I'd love to see this stacked up with an identical poll except instead of asking what is acceptable or not, ask what is effective or not. I don't think even libs are dumb enough to think any of the acceptable things are actually effective. It'd be a real telling chart.
"Feel free to protest, just not in a way that makes my life more difficult. Or in my line of sight. Or on TV. In fact, protest somewhere over there where no one can see or hear you. That's always enacted change!"
If it makes y'all feel any better this was a really poorly administered and unscientific poll.
Sample size of 1000, based on people who responded to an e-mail, more than half of the respondents were over 45, more people over 65 than under 30. (Also apparently more Trump voters than Biden voters?)
I do think this is SOMEWHAT representative of the American mind but keep this shit in mind as well.
I wonder what happened when Palestinians marched for long distances?
Also it's telling that the language is measured in terms of acceptability. It's so vague and doesn't tell anything about what should be done for the unacceptable actions.
I'd be curious in a grim sort of way how this survey would turn out if the respondents were asked what level of force is a legitimate response for such actions.
They wouldn't, because putting these sorts of questions in material terms would reveal more than they'd like. I want them to say outright if they think state murder is an acceptable response to any of these forms of protest.
"Marginalized people fighting back against the violence of their oppressors is pearl clutchingly unacceptable"
"State sanctioned violence by the oppressor is cool and good because it's legal and doesn't disrupt anything or make me uncomfortable. Support our troops and maintain the police state!"
Twisted ass people that don't know their own history
If anyone tries to give you shit about "reasonable forms of protest", look how literally the same percentage approve of either defacing property ot rioting, and scarcely any more approve of blocking traffic.
These fuckers are to the right of actual Enightenment figures in American history.
Do the things that are viewed as acceptable to such a degree that the regime is forced to respond with force. Then do the violence in self defence, have a team prepared for it in advance as well. The Chilean Primera Línea method.
Defacing property as the second worst and "rioting" (i.e. breaking and stealing shit, in their minds) as the worst really show how cucked we are to capital.
The worst possible thing they can imagine is gasp property damage.
I'm curious about the 14 % of people of people who think it is "usually unacceptable" to burn the American flag. So it's almost never ok, but they are picturing some edge case in their heads where it is suddenly time to burn the American flag. I want to know what it is!
I find it funny that picketing is okay when it's one of the most economically destructive on the list. Like, I've ruined small buisness owners with that shit.
This graph assume Americans have thier own opinions. When in reality most Americans run solely off of outrage porn in two different flavors. The only reason they hate defacing property is "their news" told them "violent rioters bad"
The average American knows so little of their own history they don't know about the whisky rebellion. Much less of the struggles of commies in the 1920s-1930s.