Israel’s evacuation order for Gaza ‘death sentence’ for patients, WHO says
Israel’s evacuation order for Gaza ‘death sentence’ for patients, WHO says
WHO spokesperson Tarik Jasarevic says time is running out to prevent humanitarian catastrophe in besieged enclave.
Not many other ways to make 1.1 million people really angry, on top of all else. Not everyone there is a terrorist, but they all have to pay the price for the actions of those whose are.
Oh there'll be a much larger number of terrorists after this.
What would you do if your family was killed by a government claiming you're inhuman just for existing and your neighbour deciding to launch a rocket at that government out of sheer frustration for their living conditions.
Honestly can't blame them if they did. Obviously killing Israeli civilians is indefensible but they are ensuring that thousands more will grow up hating all Israelis. The same logic Israelis and Israel supporters are using to kill innocent Palestinians is what Hamas runs off of. Each group blaming the entire "other" group for everything. Exactly like netanyahu wanted all along I imagine.
A much higher number of justifications for that government to crack down even further. First you demonize the enemy, then you strike against them, and when they inevitably defend themselves, you have a justification to kill the people trying to kill yours. That playbook is millenia old and still works.
I’d say a fairly high percentage of them agree with what Hamas did. That’s the Islamic world for you.
What's Hamas mad about? Have they been the subject of unjust oppression or something? As if perhaps the collective world is saying "Well of fucking course this would happen, look at what they are forced to experience"? Are there political options to end the genocidal policies that are reasonable for the continued existence of both people? Are people forced to choose leaders that present the only solution available for the option of a life not under constant oppression like a WWII Warsaw ghetto?
Nah, that can't be it, they must just hate the Jews or something.
Says the 'probably' christian whose people have committed the most genocides in the history of this world.
Correction, that's any oppressed society for you.
If I lived in Gaza now, I probably would have started to think Hamas were right all along.
And the only reason I'm not, is because I was lucky in my birth lottery. I am here not there. I am safe, and not there in danger for my life.
It's literally just luck.
Not everybody is so lucky.
I wish cooperation was a lot more typical in the world, instead of the egoistic and power hungry normal that it is. Doing whatever one can do to get an upper hand, instead of just trying to make the world a better place. In the long run, we all would benefit.
Israel won't mind. Just less Palestinians to worry about.
I mean, it is REAL fucked but those patients are already dead for all intents and purposes.
Gaza is under siege with supplies cut off. I personally think that is horrifically barbaric but i also understand that Hamas will have first dibs on any resources (similar to the issue with Afghanistan). That is not going to change so...
But also, even if power and water weren't cut off? Hamas has made it abundantly clear they will use human shields, Palestinian or Israeli, to protect themselves. And the IDF has made it clear they will bomb Hamas anyway at this point.
So it is only a matter of time until those patients, who won't be released, die in the crossfire.
Which is the true nature of guerilla warfare. You either ignore your targets any time they touch home base. Or you murder a bunch of civilians, make martyrs, and ensure that two more soldiers will take up arms for every one you kill.
Both of which will lead to more attacks and more "Why was nothing done to prevent this" accusations and even more "We aren't saying you should kill those civilians. But you should definitely kill those terrorists and we are going to look the other way while we wring our hands" to perpetuate the cycle.
You know though. I can see this but there is also the bombing. I feel like both of these at the same time is a rock and hard place. If they just did the cutoff at least civilians might be able to refugee someplace.
Again, if there is a known safe haven, guerilla fighters will use it. This has come up with every major terrorist group. If they spent all their time in giant compounds out in the field, those fields would be craters.
That isn't to say the IDF haven't used this as excuses to attack aid organizations and journalists in the past. But there is also a lot of truth to the idea that you might have reporters on the tenth floor and a terrorist meeting on the fifth.
But also? Just the cutoff will kill those patients. You need power for medical equipment. You need running water (or power) to wash your hands. And you need medical supplies. I THINK aid organizations have found ways to get the last part in, but it is still bleak.
I am not sure whether more or fewer civilians will die in the evacuation over the war itself. I am hoping fewer but... But those patients aren't going to be released and already are more or less dead unless the siege is lifted.
🇮🇱: “Evacuate 1.1 million people in 24 hours so that we can say we didn't commit war crimes.”
🇵🇸: “Are you going to donate buses, hospital supplies and temporary housing so that we can, you know, handle that?”
🇮🇱: “Do I look like fucking Red Cross to you? This is a bomb threat.”
🇵🇸: “Who’s the terrorist now?”
Palestine was never terrorist. Only hamas.
Try to convince Israel that Palestine is not a terrorist state (impossible)
Isn’t that the idea?
It's totally okay to label Hamas as terrorists if they act like terrorists. But that doesn't make all Palestinians terrorists. And it's obviously not okay to order an entire ethnic population to just go somewhere else or to attack civilians.
Israel is a genicidal apartheid state.
Hammas local command is built in tunnels under an hospital in Gaza Strip. The options Israel have are: A. Don't hurt Hammad to save Palestinians but suffer more attacks on Israelis. B. Kill every last hammas member, getting some Palestinians dead, but saving its own citizans.
Shity options, one has to be made.
On the grand scale of things, Hammad directly killed more Palestinians than Israel did. They murdered membera of FATAH for example. So if this war actually eliminate Hammas (spoiler: it won't) than it will save the life of many Palestinians that don't agree with Hammas.
But wannabe leftists on the Interwebs from safe westarn countries want to be cute and defend Hammas cus they are supposdly the opersed party.
Permanently Deleted
You reply like a retarded propoganda bot. The map you are refering to is misinformation, in 1946 Palestines owned less than 2% of the marked land. The rest was state owned, first by the othmans, then the Brits.
Israel is commiting many war crimes, but genocide is not one of them. On the count of killing Palestinians Hammas is way ahead and killed much more than Israel did.
And for your last paragraph, I already wrote, it will not eliminate Hammas.
The reason Hammas attacked Israel has nothinng to do with the shit you said, it's because Hammas is a religious group that want to kill all Jews world wide, and then put the shria law every where. They are not different from ISIS.
If Hamas cares about Gaza residents they will voluntarily hand themselves over.
You think Israel would stop if Hamas turned themselves in? /s
That is sadly what I fear, too. They had the Gaza strip locked down in all sorts of ways before and they will not award the Palestinians any breathing room...
What on Earth would lead you to think Hamas cares about Gaza residents? The whole point of Hamas's attacks was to provoke this sort of Israeli reaction. The innocent Palestinians who are going to die in this attack are no more than disposable pawns and human shields to Hamas.