Skip Navigation

Zelenskyy leaves White House without signing minerals deal after Oval Office blowup

If you do not want to be completely disgusted, embarrassed and angry then don't watch the video of the Oval Office discussion.

World News @lemmit.online

Zelenskyy leaves White House without signing minerals deal after Oval Office blowup

2 0
News & Events Surrounding Russia's Invasion of Ukraine @lemmit.online

Zelenskyy says Ukraine won’t enter peace talks with Russia until it has security guarantees

1 0
35 comments
  • I knew Trump just wanted to try to strong arm him into signing away their mineral rights. They kicked them out of the Whitehouse afterward, and Trump said Zelenskyy could come back when he's ready to talk about peace.

    Zelenskyy literally kept asking about security measures/promises.

    Why would he sign a deal to fork over mineral rights when America would just walk in, steal their minerals, and then immediately leave them SOL just like they did to the interpreters and people who helped in the war in the Middle East?

    The one really great thing about this was that it was straight-up televised proof that Trump and company are authoritarian fascists. It's kind of incredible that they are so blunt about it. I think that blunt straightforwardness will be their downfall.

    You would have to be a very dense person or just as terrible to agree with them at this point. They have shown the world their true colors at this point, and I feel like it's a matter of time before their time runs out.

    • Original $500B mineral deal was crazy for Ukraine. AFAIK, the deal that was planned to sign was a "mere framework" where future US money would be negotiated to be repaid within the framework. The deal to be signed was a fairly empty one.

      The substantive parts of the outburst was "Zelensky doesn't even want a ceasefire, and has hatred for Russia", and so however empty the mineral deal was in Ukrainian commitments, it was still a ploy to keep the flow of weapons for purposes of extending the timeline of Ukrainian losses. Europe is still envisioning using Ukraine as a terrorism proxy on Russia after any "lasting peace", which Zelensky committed to by tweet after the meeting. Ukraine needs to "relegalize" parties that included Yanukovych, and have elections that include those parties with the option of Ukraine neutrality that Russia demands. That is the "lasting peace option"

      It is simply playing into US empire hands to discard the most humanist antiwar position, since JFK, in the history of US empire, as a negative despite coming from a fascist, as an excuse to seek further submission to US weapons sales to go it alone on a demonic war against Russia.

    • The one really great thing about this was that it was straight-up televised proof that Trump and company are authoritarian fascists.

      Anyone who did not know this. Is unlikely to be swung by this event.

      They will likely agree with trumps illogical sign the deal first crap. Thinking like trump. IE "beggers can't be choosers and if Ukraine wants anything they should bow the the all mighty USA."

      I've not seen any evidence that evidence matters one jot to these voters. They will interpret anything in their favour.

  • Zelenskyy has pulled off an incredible diplomatic move. He’s illustrating to the public both at home and abroad, that Ukraine is an independent country and he’s calling trump’s bluff.

    Trump has been bluffing this whole time. Leaning on this idea that he can just pull the plug on aid to Ukraine, on this idea of the unitary executive. The thing is, Ukraine is still a popular cause in America, both with in government institutions and the public, despite the efforts of so many. Trump’s bully pulpit is not so strong as to change that with a stroke of a pen.

    Now, trump can attempt to unilaterally revoke aid, but that will run in to real legal road blocks and create bipartisan public dissent, thus undermining the fiction of the unitary executive. Or he can change his tone, real fucking fast, and claim he always had the intention to support Ukraine, his supporters will buy it, like every other random shift he’s pulled, and everyone else will shrug and say “I guess a broken clock is right twice a day”.

    He’s put trump in a position where the only winning option is to support Ukraine, and the losing options earns him both another public opinion and institutional battle. The question is, what threatens trump more? That bad outcome or what ever the pro-russia people have on him?

  • @remington hot take: I think Ukraine will actually allow European companies access to rare earth minerals, as long as they also offer some production facilities locally - this will be especially useful for military purposes. Europe will also take advantage of locally produced Lithium batteries, necessary for cars and various electronics, and this in turn will make Ukraine even more attractive to Europe as a whole and will also be willing to make more concessions to Ukraine.

    If I'm not mistaken, the US already has access to various rare earth minerals, that's why for them, it is not so important and they can bluff. Zelenskyy just wanted to raise some interest for Trump in this whole rare earth thing in exchange for protection, but Trump saw the opportunity, and he's now trying to twist this to his own interest (i.e. give me all your minerals, or you'll no longer get support from us).

    Ukraine is very lucky to have an extremely clever president who won't easily give in. I guess the memory of the whole Budapest Memorandum fiasco also helps.

    • This largely relies on Europe getting its shit together in the face of a sudden trans-Atlantic shift. The resources are there; the question is the timeline. Everyone's scrambling to figure out what NATO actually is, which provides this wedge.

      • @Powderhorn I think the incentive is there. The new chancellor of Germany is very americano-sceptic (given the current situation) and I do not think France will stand aside. Denmark is facing a possible future aggressor so it's more likely to also push for europenism and other states might follow suit as well. Right now we're caught off-guard indeed.

    • I see what you mean. Good points.

35 comments