Skip Navigation
38 comments

  • European leaders, if they can even be called that, abandoned even the pretense of a rules based world in their eagerness to serve as obedient vassals. By supporting the blatant violation of international law in Gaza, they shattered the very principles that could have shielded them from the same fate.

    Europe has actively dismantled the very institutions that could protected it from the predatory ambitions of stronger powers. By embracing "might makes right," Europe has forfeited its moral authority when the same logic is turned against it. The US will exploit the current state of European weakness mercilessly, reducing it to a dependent appendage, stripped of autonomy and dignity.

    Europe stands on the precipice of its own century of humiliation that it's marching into with eyes wide open. It's is no longer a player at the table of global power, and now finds itself on the menu.

    • I don’t think Europe’s naked hypocrisy w/r/t Gaza really factors in to Europe’s table vs. menu status.

    • 💯

    • With regards to supporting Israel, at first it was fine (since the last attack) but how they can continue to support a regime conducting genocide upon Gazans is beyond me. However, in many UN calls for the conflict to end, it was ever only the US that voted in favour of Israel. I don't think they abandoned the rules, its just that a rules based worked order is only as reliable as those who enforce it

      It does seem to me that a rules based world is not viable (for now) because none of the big players actually follow the rules. Ex: China for a while has not followed trade rules and subsiquently neither has the US (since they became scared of China's rapid development). With trump 2.0, the world policeman is starting to look very fascist which is not a situation any EU leader could have fathomed a decade ago.

      If anything, the EU has been trying to bolster the EU as an entity inorder to protect itself. It's just not everyone in the EU agrees on that course and due to the unanimity requirements, things just can't change. Since the end of WW2 Europe has been a vassel for the US and even until now that's not markedly changes even if it's gotten a little more difficult with the creation of the EU.

      That being said, if the EU cannot finally get their shit together then I agree with your last point, they will be eaten alive by the US and China

      • At no point was the genocide in Gaza fine. People have a tendency to just arbitrarily pick a point in history, such as the October 7 attack, and ignore everything that led up to it. The crimes against humanity have been going on for decades, and the west chose to look the other way.

  • They are shitting themselves in Copenhagen over the Trump Greenland crisis. The Danish regime is increasingly paranoid that some leak, some unscripted comment could anger their transatlantic overlord. Initially the regime was projecting national unity, giving confidential briefings on the crisis to the leaders of all parties in parliament. However, since the infamous phone call the regime has retreated into its shell, sharing its secrets with only the leaders of a chosen few "government-bearing" centrist and right-wing parties, the ones deemed loyal to atlanticist orthodoxy and who can be trusted to keep their mouths shut.

    Leaders of business as well as unions has received confidential briefings as well, so they can brace for the coming storm of Trumpian tariffs. However, the regime has told the public very few details about the Trump phone call and only mentioned the American supreme leader's tantrum by saying that he "can be very direct".

    On her Facebook page (her preferred line of communication to the public) Danish leader Mette Frederiksen has posted that the regime "can't tell everything or make statements as quick as other people", telling the public that they will be kept in the dark until the crisis is resolved.

    There has been no official defiance of Trump. Instead, the regime is groveling, their fear palpable as they scramble to prove their loyalty to Washington even as Trump’s boot hovers over their necks. When a fascist Danish MEP told Trump to "fuck off", voicing the feelings of most people in both Greenland and Denmark, the Danish regime scolded him for being irresponsible, afraid that he might poke the bear.

    Meanwhile, it has been hinted that the regime and the "government-bearing" parties has talked behind closed doors of giving Greenland a more equitable relationship to Denmark, of sweetening the deal to keep the colony loyal to Denmark. However, these efforts might end up being a day late and a dollar short as the uncomfortable truth about Trump's claims that Denmark is being racist to Greenlanders and has failed to develop the island is that they are not exactly false.

    Greenlandic elections are coming up and independence is going to be a major issue. Committing to Danish overlordship is not something many Greenlanders desire. Meanwhile, the Danish regime's attempts to woo Greenland are being further hamstrung by domestic reactionaries raging over economic grants to Greenland and boiling with white supremacist rage at the thought of Greenlanders having the audacity to desire freedom from Danish rule.

    Trump's threats has triggered a profound ideological crisis in Denmark's political elite. They are completely unprepared to deal with being in the crosshairs of American imperialism. For generations they have been telling themselves that "America is our closest ally!". They believed America to be their protector, their friend and they turned Denmark into one of Washington’s most obedient puppets, a loyal lapdog by even the most sycophantic Western European standards. But now the protector has become the predator, and the Danish political elite is utterly unprepared to deal with it.

  • Denmark / Greenland should expel the US personel in Pituffik SFB. They clearly harbor a 5th column from a hostile country on their soil.

    • One of the most basic rules of projecting authority is that you should never make threats that you're not willing or able to follow true with. If Denmark told the US to end their military occupation of Greenland, the yanks could very well choose to simply ignore those orders, making it unbearably obvious exactly how paper-thin Danish sovereignty over Greenland actually is.

      • If Denmark told the US to end their military occupation of Greenland, the yanks could very well choose to simply ignore those orders

        This already happened multiple times between 1941 and 1949, in 1949 Denmark became part of NATO and stopped or was stopped from further complaining.

  • Hey Mr president, you know I got to play the bad guy role. Are u ok with that? The other big boy where the do the khorovod dance already did it with Ukraine.

    We're all waiting for the last big boy on other side of the world who is coming down with huge fireworks and FX on all big cities, we'll laugh hard

    #funny

38 comments