Who are you, who are so wise in the ways of SCIENCE?
Feel free to remove this, mods, if it's too tangential to modern science, but I thought the community might find this early nature vs. nurture hypothesis amusing
Something tells me the results were displeasing
According to Wikipedia:
"The experiments were recorded by the monk Salimbene di Adam in his Chronicles, who was generally extremely negative about Fredrick II (portraying his calamities as parallel to the Biblical plagues in The Twelve Calamities of Emperor Frederick II) and wrote that Frederick encouraged 'foster-mothers and nurses to suckle and bathe and wash the children, but in no ways to prattle or speak with them; for he would have learnt whether they would speak the Hebrew language (which he took to have been the first), or Greek, or Latin, or Arabic, or perchance the tongue of their parents of whom they had been born. But he laboured in vain, for the children could not live without clappings of the hands, and gestures, and gladness of countenance, and blandishments.'"
So, as you'd expect of someone raised without any formal language, other means of communication were necessary to get the children to do anything. The last sentence seems to indicate that they didn't respond well to people who appeared unhappy with them.
This should be obvious, but even children will invent basic language. You only need to look as far as the deaf community for that, that always came up with pidgin languages even as they were forced to try and learn spoken language.
There's an interesting free short documentary here: https://www.bslzone.co.uk/watch/history-deaf-education-1
If they're in a group with other humans. If you grow up without language like child raised by wolves then you just miss out on language completely and it's very hard to impossible to learn later once your special infant brain language tool is gone.
His face when they just make incomprehensible grunts and poop on the rug.
They ended up developing a rudimentary sign language based on facial expressions and gestures. Because the women who were taking care of them were strictly instructed to never speak… But they were never given any instructions regarding facial expressions or gestures. So the kids learned that expressions and gestures are how to communicate.
Oh good, there's a bit of a silver lining. They weren't taught how to speak but the care-givers still interacted and communicated with them, albeit a limited amount.
This was perhaps done to "prove a hole in Adam and Eve story"? They were manufactured as adults, but might then lack the childish capacity for language learning. If created with fully developed language capacity, then why not create them with full understanding of obedience to God's will. It would take a lot of time and patience to teach God's language at a pace suitable for undeveloped beings made of dust and ribs.
Some goat herders in the bronze age had this fun story about why snakes, the smartest animal, didn't have legs. Also the storm God of wrath that demands the blood of the first born babies or he will strike you dead, made a golem and named him 'red man' and he made a woman from the golem parts, and there were trees of concepts, and a flaming sword, and uhh.. yeah it kind of went off the rails. This is why I only worship Ashera. El and Adoni are such dicks.
I brought this up earlier in another thread, and I couldn't find a wiki page for the actual experiment, just a page about similar experiments, where it cited this one briefly. But I'm pretty damn sure I read about years ago on Wikipedia just browsing random pages and doing the whole "rabbit hole" thing.
Hohenzollern or Hohenstaufen?
Apparently there's enough comments to convince me this was serious. Generations would invent language, but it's a tough ask for children to do it, and expect that it matches any existing langunge. Why cats and dogs are not called meowsers and woofers in a language I know is beyond me.
The Egyptian word for cat was “mau” so close enough
Cat in Mandarin is māo
Children have been documented to spontaneously invent language.
Thank you for link. Interesting. It did show language evolving/changing quickly. Any expectation that they would reinvent ASL or Aramaic independently would have been an absurd expectation.
To be fair, given the model he was working with, this was actually a descent experiment so long as you ignore the ethical implications.