“Communism doesn’t work”

This implies the CIA disinfo was some kind of oopsie
- The purpose was that the disinformation was so bad that it shocked even the professor
- Agreed, the professor’s mouth and eyebrow should be flipped around.

Downvote spam report: 1/4th of the downvotes on this one (so far) are from zero-content accounts.
- Who could have done this
- zero-content accounts
  🙄
  Again with this. Just for context, how many of the upvotes are zero-content accounts?
- Interesting. How do you find that out?
  
  Admins can see voting patterns.
  
  Admins can see who upvotes and downvotes, I'm pretty sure.

I'd even replace communism with socialism. Since it's also vilified in the US, but it's a broader term which is, to me, more relevant nowadays.
- What do you mean? Socialism is generally just the process of building Communism.
  
  There exists socialist theory outside of marxism-leninism
  
  Well I'd say communism is a type of socialism, where the latter is the ideal to strive for a better society for everyone, to intervene to help those who cannot help themselves. Communism tries to achieve this goal by making the means of production into communal ownership. With the State enforcing strict wealth equality. But it's still socialism with economic inequality at the beginning but fair and strong wealth redistribution in the end: equity.

Communism works and has worked for thousands of years. People thrive when their needs are met. It's authoritarianism that doesn't work
- When do you call a system "Communist" and when do you call it "Authoritarian?" Early-human "communism" isn't what Communists advocate for, instead Communists advocate for moving beyond Capitalism.
- authoritarianism has worked for thousands of years.
  
  just because the system isn't working for you doesn't mean it's not working
  
  Depends on the goal doesn’t it?
  Authoritarianism archives incredible luxury and comfort for a very small portion of people.
  Communism archives collective well being and minimized suffering.
- Tell this to the people from the former USSR/Eastern Block. I'm not saying communism can't work in any way, but I am saying that, at least historically, it has not worked.
  
  The vast majority of Eastern Europeans wished the USSR never dissolved. Furthermore, the vast majority of people voted to retain the USSR, then it was dissolved anyways.
  Why do you say "historically it has not worked," then vaguely gesture towards people who believe it very much did work better than their current Capitalism?

communism always fails because it's authoritarian, that's the same reason the west, the east and everything else will fall

Ah yes it was the CIA that did the Holodomor
- Famines were common occurrence before the revolution, and were in fact a major driver behind it. USSR doubled life expectancy in just 20 years. A newborn child in 1926-27 had a life expectancy of 44.4 years, up from 32.3 years thirty years before. In 1958-59 the life expectancy for newborns went up to 68.6 years. the Semashko system of the USSR increased lifespan by 50% in 20 years. By the 1960's, lifespans in the USSR were comparable to those in the USA:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Soviet_Union
  https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB5054/index1.html
  Quality of nutrition improved after the Soviet revolution, and the last time USSR had a famine was in 1940s. CIA data suggests they ate just as much as Americans after WW2 peroid while having better nutrition:
  https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp84b00274r000300150009-5
  During the 1932 Holodomor Famine, the USSR sent aid to affected regions in an attempt to alleviate the famine. According to Mark Tauger in his article, The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933:
  While the leadership did not stop exports, they did try to alleviate the famine. A 25 February 1933 Central Committee decree allotted seed loans of 320,000 tons to Ukraine and 240,000 tons to the northern Caucasus. Seed loans were also made to the Lower Volga and may have been made to other regions as well. Kul'chyts'kyy cites Ukrainian party archives showing that total aid to Ukraine by April 1933 actually exceeded 560,000 tons, including more than 80,000 tons of food
  Some bring up massive grain exports during the famine to show that the Soviet Union exported food while Ukraine starved. This is fallacious for a number of reasons, but most importantly of all the amount of aid that was sent to Ukraine alone actually exceeded the amount that was exported at the time.
  Aid to Ukraine alone was 60 percent greater than the amount exported during the same period. Total aid to famine regions was more than double exports for the first half of 1933.
  According to Tauger, the reason why more aid was not provided was because of the low harvest
  It appears to have been another consequence of the low 1932 harvest that more aid was not provided: After the low 1931, 1934, and 1936 harvests procured grain was transferred back to peasants at the expense of exports.
  Tauger is not a communist, and ultimately this specific article takes the view that the low harvest was caused by collectivization (he factors in the natural causes of the famine in later articles, based on how he completely neglects to mention weather in this article at all its clear that his position shifted over the years). However, its interesting to see that the Soviets really did try to alleviate the famine as best as they could.
  https://www.jstor.org/stable/2500600
- To be clear, that was authoritarianism, not communism.
  
  Ah, communism is like unicorns. Many people like them but nobody have seen them alive. Because every communist state is not communist but authoritarian.
  
  When does a Communist country become authoritarian? This line is always repeated by sympathetic liberals that haven't read theory yet think they know enough to judge Leftist movements.