Rationalism meets iNaturalist: ficus all
Rationalism meets iNaturalist: ficus all
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bc84/5bc84e3de2e841f514e232226038e0402ae749b7" alt=""
recently on youtube i uncovered a “new” ficus species in the himalayas… ficus timlada. this isn’t a straightforward new species case like someone posting pics of a butterfly that experts had never seen before. in the ficus case, basically the taxonomic system failed because it’s fundamentally fla...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e795/9e795f4df989639e0127182922e0457d5ac9133b" alt="Optimal recruitment"
This is worth delurking for.
A ficus-lover on the forums for iNaturalist (where people crowdsource identifications of nature pics) is clearly brain-poisoned by LW or their ilk, and perforce doesn't understand why the bug-loving iNat crew don't agree that
inaturalist should be a market, so that our preferences, as revealed through our donations, directly influence the supply of observations and ids.
Personally, I have spent enough time on iNat that I can identify a Rat when I see one.
I can't capture the glory of this in a few pull quotations; you'll have to go there to see the batshit.
(h/t hawkpartys @ tumblr)