The hottest 14 days ever recorded are the last 2 weeks
The hottest 14 days ever recorded are the last 2 weeks
您正在查看单个对话串。
669 评论
-
Man, I'm so glad this global warming thing is leftist propaganda or I'd really be freaking out right now.
-
Luckily, we can choose to reject reality and believe whatever makes us feel better.
I feel best believing the biosphere is gonna force humanity to “find out” for the last century of fuckin around with a recklessly unplanned terraform.
-
Love how the collective of humanity needs to find out because the richest few fucked around.
-
You can always find these people and make them find. They are actively committing genocide against the human race.
-
We ned a guillotine emoji.
-
-
But the rich are supplying a demand. And a ton of innovation wouldn’t be there without them.
-
Imagine thinking CEOs drive innovation lmao
-
Why does it seem like there are a ton more conservatives here on Lemmy than there were on Reddit?
-
My theory is they just had a habit of getting banned so they weren't as visable
-
I don’t know how I feel about it. On one hand, it makes for less of an echo chamber. On the other hand, their thoughts are fucking stupid and it hurts my brain to see them.
-
They have the right to be here and express their thoughts.
What they don't have is a right to our attention.
Ignore them and block accounts that get annoying.
-
-
-
Idk. I’m on kbin and haven’t experienced that. Usually when I wish violent death on conservatives I get a ton of upvotes.
-
I mean, I think they're definitely still in the minority. It seems like there's a larger proportion of them here than on reddit. I see more of their opinions here. Maybe that's just how the algo works here regarding upvotes & downvotes and how comments are displayed.
-
It’s worst on lemmy.world I’ve noticed. Beehaw was right to defederate. Y’all need to tell them in the kindest possible words to go die over and over again until they don’t come back or you’ll end up like voat.
-
-
-
Happy to have them here. I almost never agree with them, but not only is it good to have your opinion challenged (though often wearying to have to repeat yourself), it's good for THEM to have their opinion challenged too. Maybe only 1/100 will change their opinion after being challenged and seeing that their opinion is very much in the minority, but that's 1/100 more than if we were all chatting away in a safe space with no opposing views.
(and to be clear, no I don't think shit like nazis, devout racists etc is an 'opposing view' that deserves any debate)
-
For every person that choose to leave reddit...
There's 5-10 "conservatives" who were ip banned and dont have a choice between Reddit and Lemmy.
-
They are not getting down-voted into nothingness for refusing to tow the party line.
I appreciate the variety of opinions presented here. Plus (in my experience) the conversation has been civil.
-
Yeah. I hardcore disagree with conservatives as a libertarian socialist myself, but I always want to hear what people who disagree with me (and people who agree with me) are saying, and engage in civil conversation with people who actually believe what they say.
The problem for me comes when shills (people who don't believe what they say but get paid to say it) come into the conversation, or when people use outright disingenuous arguments (usually strawmans).
-
Assuming any conservative is arguing in good faith is your first mistake.
-
You very well may be correct, but I always like to assume people are good and are arguing in good faith until proven otherwise.
If I can "steelman" (opposite of strawman) their position, and argue against it easilly, I see no reason not to do so, and that also makes for a better argument for other people viewing the comment thread who may believe the false notion that climate change is either fake or not caused by humans.
To me, trying to argue that climate change is fake or not caused by humans is the same as trying to argue that the Earth is flat. Very easy to debunk.
-
That is a recipe for wasting a huge amount of time in people whose main goal is to waste your time.
-
-
-
You mean like the disinformation that this user is literally spreading in this very thread?
-
If they actually believe it, I would like to argue the factual point, which is very easy to do. If they don't believe what they are saying, then yes, I have a problem with it.
There is plenty of evidence pointing to the fact that climate change is real and that it is caused by humans. If they choose to not listen to evidence and hard facts, then they lost the debate. If they say that big money funded those studies, simply point them to the Big Oil-funded studies claiming that climate change is false, and the fact that they originally found that it was true, and then tried to bury it.
-
-
People posting the same few thoroughly debunked ideas over and over gets really old.
-
-
-
-
But they kinda do. Imagine Samsung or Apple stopping innovation. Company goes bankrupt.
-
You think Tim Apple is coming up with their innovations? Lol
-
-
while I do completely agree with Apple depressing lack of any innovation recently, until modern foldable phones become commonplace, there is only so much you can do with a brick of glass.
-
-
That's kind of a dumb way to make the point. Innovation isn't necessarily apparent in a photo with no context or information. A bronze sword and a steel sword still both look like swords, but there a huge technological difference between them.
-
-
Your implied point was that there wasn't any innovation, but there was, by your own admission above.
Don't shift the goalposts by latching onto an analogy I made. The fact is that the technology has progressed quite quickly over the timespan represented in those pictures, and that fact underscores what's wrong with the post you were responding to - it wasn't a handful of rich folk that did it, it was the work of hundreds of thousands of people around the world. You had a much better point to make than the one you did.
-
-
Okay but we all know iPhones and we all know that's about it.
-
-
Hey, they came up with some interesting colours no one has used in 80 years.
-
-
No, but it takes a person to control a company. A Person to direct the goals of a company. So I guess Tim Apple is somewhat involved if there is innovation or not.
-
That's a good point. You must have a really smart boss to come up with ideas like that.
-
So you feel entitled and experienced enough to lead a company?
-
-
He’s very good with financials and supply chains, I’ll give him that.
-
And since the profits can be invested into research, it is somewhat linked.
-
-
No it doesn't. Worker-owned co-ops exist. Didn't you say you're in Germany? You should know all about that.
-
I don’t know what you think of us Germans. But we are rational capitalists. And I do believe to know a lot about it.
-
No, you misunderstand. I'm all for the idea. You just seem to be unaware that it exists. Learn about your own country:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codetermination_in_Germany
https://www.ibisworld.com/germany/industry/cooperatives/937/
Here's a non-German example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation
-
-
-
-
-
Oh brother
-
Man I am kinda sorry, that I invade your worldview.
But rich people don’t have all their money stored in a vault like Dagobert Duck. It’s all stocks.
And boy, if one of the companies make losses, then their money goes downhill. It’s volatile.
And due to immense concurrence in innovation in the tech sector, every investor has a huge interest in innovation.
And with many investment, the start of a company is ensured.
The current capitalism is the system that works best.
Especially the US capitalism is one hell of a driver in innovation. I live in Germany and many companies wouldn’t be possible here. Even though we have capitalism, it’s much softer than its US counterpart.
The downside of course is poverty for cheaper labour.
And that’s brutal, but it’s the reality we live in.
Though I wouldn’t want to live in the US without healthcare, on the counter side I wouldn’t want to start a company here in Europe.
-
UserDoesNotExist, what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this website is now dumber for having read it. I award you one downvote, and may God have mercy on your soul.
-
-
Sorry if you do not understand the system we live in.
-
My dude, your argument boils down to "this is the way we've always done it so this is the way it must be".
Have you considered the possibility that if innovation were to slow, and companies DIDN'T insist on quarter-after-quarter growth, the world might just continue to turn? That while the richest individuals may be slightly less rich, the vast majority of people would continue their lives with no negative consequences?
-
-
-
btw they do store a lot of their money in vaults where it doesnt benefit the economy at all.
This is in the form of expensive art that stays in containers in tax-free zones, and offshore accounts in tax havens.
Please educate yourself.
https://archive-yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/how-wealthy-sell-treasures-tax-free
https://www.icij.org/inside-icij/2017/09/7-charts-show-how-rich-hide-their-cash
-
But most of it is still invested in stocks. So those few links have relatively little impact.
-
-
Wealth hoarding is a massive problem irl
-
No it’s not. It has already been studied, that with an inflation rate of roughly 2 percent, that people are more willing to spend.
And currently we exceed this by far. And people do spend their money in an attempt to get the most out of it.
So wealth hoarding is currently no problem. And in a well managed economical state, it as well becomes no problem.
-
-
-
-
-
-
You mean the innovation that's destroying the planet? Ok bro.
-
-
This is a good example of the worst kind of pseudo intellectual bs that tricks the uninformed. It's confidently wrong in so many different areas that I don't even know where to start.
-
Maybe if you don’t know where to start means that you don’t know where I am actually wrong?
-
Let me grab a shovel for you so you can dig yourself deeper.
-
Dig myself deeper? I don’t understand. What are you referring to.
-
-
Come on Lemmy, how can you fall for this basic level of trolling
-
-
-
Holy shit please tell me this person is just trolling us. I refuse to believe this is a real take
-
Anytime someone points to the Saudis as an example to follow…probably don’t need to listen to anything else they say.
-
I am no troll. I believe that I see the world as it is. I guess so do you.
Doesn’t matter much though. No matter what we do. We will see who is right. Luckily time passes all by itself. For now.
-
Yup, troll!
Move along people, nothing to see here.
-
In fact, I'm not sure this user even exists...
-
I take offence in being called a troll. It’s insulting. You can’t just call someone a troll with a different opinion and claim that this invalidates my argument.
-
-
But we've already seen who's right. Most innovation comes from public universities and institutes.
-
This is simply wrong. Basic research comes from universities and institutes.
But most research, Including research with application potential, comes from the privat sector. This includes the Pharma industry, the medical industry, the chemical industry, semi conductor industry and informatics.
It is mainly driven by big companies. In constant need to outperform their competition, or not to fall behind in research and innovation.
-
Quickly testing if I go banned because some of my comments were deleted.
Edit: nope. Not banned.
(☞ﾟヮﾟ)☞ This is a community of well mannered people and good conversations.
-
-
-
-
-
European style houses won't save anyone from extreme heat
Europe has had plenty of fatal heatwaves in the past.
Saudi Arabia has 'proven' whatever it has proven through insane levels of draconian state intervention in everything, a lot of oil rents, and using imported slave labour.
https://www.hrw.org/reports/2008/saudiarabia0708/5.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_workers_in_Saudi_Arabia?wprov=sfla1
Hardly a model for anyone to follow.
-
I don’t think you have been reading a single one of the articles. The first one already is a not so fitting response to m claim that European style houses are ore resilient against extreme weather events.
-
The first one is about how wet bulb temperatures and extreme heat work. The second one is about Europe. Whether or not they are 'more' resilient doesn't matter.
Also I don't think you know what Europe is. Scandinavian, Central European and British houses are mostly made to keep heat in during cold winters. They're not good for heatwaves.
Mediterranean style housing is definitely better for heat. But that doesn't stop Italy, Spain, and France from having deadly heatwaves.
-
The first one is about how wet bulb temperatures and extreme heat work. The second one is about Europe. Whether or not they are 'more' resilient doesn't matter.
Yes it does matter. European housing is well insulated. And definitely sturdier than US housing.
Also I don't think you know what Europe is.
Yea, my bad. As a German I obviously have no idea what Europe is.
Scandinavian, Central European and British houses are mostly made to keep heat in during cold winters. They're not good for heatwaves.
This is wrong. Insulation goes both ways. In summer it helps keeping the cooler night temperatures inside.
Mediterranean style housing is definitely better for heat. But that doesn't stop Italy, Spain, and France from having deadly heatwaves.
Mediterranean housing is not especially good against heat. Wrong assumption. Swedes, Germans and the French are doing a much better job than the mediterranes.
-
Won't dispute that European housing is sturdier. And yes insulation works both ways - however, you need good ventilation. And shading etc. AFAIK insulation optimised for heat retention is different to that optimised for keeping cool.
If you have a study or something that compares Mediterranean vs other European house designs, please send it to me and I'll change my mind if I'm wrong.
As a German you should know that heatwaves have killed thousands of people in Germany as well.
Swedes, Germans, and French are also wealthier and have less extreme heat to deal with than Italy, Spain or Greece. You can't attribute that to house design. Again, if you have a study comparing these, send it to me and prove me wrong.
-
-
-
-
-
adapting to extreme weather events shouldn’t be too hard. Maybe start building European style housing.
European style house, 2021, Germany: https://piped.video/watch?v=Ork8a_qrw8s
-
A similar flood happened in 1804 in the same region. Exactly the same region.
The houses were placed in a strategically bad position.
And many had no cellars ( to reinforce the houses in the ground).
-
-
-
-
The worst kind of bootlicking.
-
Oh no, I was called a bootlicker and my ego will now collapse…
-
-
Are you sure it's not the demand driving the demand? The rich are the supply-side of "supply and demand".
-
Demand driving the demand?
Does needing something increase the need for it by itself into infinite need?
-
The demand side of the economy is the consumer population. The consumers decide what they do and do not want to purchase, therefore driving demand.
"Infinite need" implies that infinite supply could exist, or that infinite growth is sustainable, both of which are not true. Infinite need also doesn't exist.
I will argue that people (for example) needing clean water increases the demand for clean water. This is why companies like Nestle are profiteering off of selling bottled water, and why the CEO said that water should not be a human right.
-
Wait. But someone has to bottle the water, right? Or is nestle supposed to do it for free?
Furthermore they have to compete with tap water. So the value of bottled water can only be the water itself + bottle + energy used to fill bottle + interest because their “service” is not for free. There is a justified interest to make a profit from one’s efforts.
-
Nestle is stealing water from the people who need it. Sources: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/27/california-nestle-water-san-bernardino-forest-drought https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/29/us/nestle-water-california.html
It's not their water to begin with.
Also in some places (Flint, MI comes to mind), tap water in undrinkable due to neglect, since fixing it costs more money than ignoring the health of the population. Source: https://apnews.com/article/health-michigan-rick-snyder-flint-detroit-a4578736862f47b980ae61ca72129811
-
-
-
-
Demand driving the demand?
Does needing something increase the need for it by itself into infinite need?
-
-
Like the
explosion motorcombustion engine?-
What’s an explosion motor? Motor ain’t supposed to explode.
-
.... Do you really not know how combustion engines work?
They use combustion.
-
Shhh shhh. You gotta use crayons for the big words.
-
English is not my primary language. I believe it was explosion motor what you have written at first.
And while I am no expert of the workings of a modern combustion engine, I do indeed have an understanding of how a combustion engine works.
I also know what reaction takes place and I know the average fuel consumption of an average European car.
-
I also know what reaction takes place
If it's not an explosion, what is it?
Because literally any other answer that's not a synonym for explosion is wrong...
-
It’s a controlled combustion. Not an explosion. Explosion is uncontrolled expansion of gases (also includes expansion without chemical reaction)
-
That's wrong, and it wasn't even entertaining...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ribbit
-
I give you that. Just a few were directly involved in innovation.
But the rich do quite successfully create the framework conditions for innovation and development. Mostly driven by profit, but a world based purely on goodwill fails at the first doubter, the first who does not want to participate. So capitalism is what we got. And so far it has proven to be more resilient than other systems.
-
-
-
-
Thanks to denial, I'm immortal!
-
-
-
My uber driver said that global warming is actually true but have literally nothing about human influence.
Some years ago these persons were saying that global warming was a hoax, now that only the human influence is a hoax.
-
I always hated that argument from people.
Even if they're right — which we all know they are not — it wouldn't matter. Climate change is going to devastate human life if we do nothing. If, somehow, the source of the warming wasn't human-caused, we'd still need to find a way to counteract it. It's not our fault doesn't prevent it from being our problem.
-
"it has nothing to do with human influence"
"Ok, then let's prepare for the inevitable, strengthen infrastructure, prepare for mass migrations, improve our crops to sustain bigger variances in weather, evacuate people from flood danger zones, ensure our supply chain doesn't collapse, fund poor countries so they can survive better, etc. You know, prepare for the crisis"
:|
:(
-
I had a guy tell me once that maybe climate change is just the Earth getting closer to the sun, and we should send an astronaut up to the Hubble telescope so they can look through it and measure the distance to the sun....
I've known this guy for over a decade, and it's not that he's stupid, he's just completely ignorant about climate change and doesn't put in any effort to learn about science.
-
-
Ahhh, yes. The conservative backpedalling.
It's not happening. It's happening but it's all cyclical. It's not cyclical this time but it's not our fault. It's our fault but global warming is good ackshually. Global warming is bad but there's nothing we can do about it. We could do something about it but it's too expensive/late. Maybe it's not too expensive but THE CHINESE!
-
In stage one we say nothing is going to happen.
Stage two, we say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it.
In stage three, we say that maybe we should do something about it, but there's nothing we can do.
Stage four, we say maybe there was something we could have done, but it's too late now.
-
-
Had a argument with a person on YouTube, he thought that increased CO2 in the atmosphere would be beneficial. It would help plants grow better!
Also that humans was not behind it.
-
It's not a problem! And if it is, it's not our fault. And even if it is, it was completely necessary.
-
Basically all right wing policies.
-
You got it wrong, it's:
That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it.
(no not all conservatives/climate change deniers are narcissists but the overlap is interesting)
-
-
There's a lot of money pushing this idea. I live in a certain US state where an organization has been paying to have billboards up that push this idea for years now.
-
The most terrible thing is that it's a half truth. While yes plants grow better with increased CO2, the downsides are so destructive it is not at all beneficial.
-
The plants will drown, and we will suffocate.
-
-
-
They might grow bigger, but I don't think they grow better. Veritasium did a video about the increase in CO2 having an effect on plants.
-
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/Yl_K2Ata6XY
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
-
oo Interesting video! I'll send it to them ^^ thanks <3
-
-
BuT CO2 iS pLaNt FoOd! Why do you hate plants!
-
I heard that on talk radio once too. 20 years ago!
-
-
The sad thing is we're supposed to be in a ice age. The plant is further away from the sun about the same plane since the last ice age.
-
It's crazy how often I find this fitting: The Four Stage Strategy. At least it gives me a smile now and then.
-
If you're based in the UK, then all you can do is smile at the shit we have to deal with government-wise. If you don't laugh, you'll go mad, kinda thing.
That 'Four Stage Strategy' is horribly, horribly apt even today.
-
-
I've found a clever way to counter those folks is to say, "you might be right, and as the apex species it's our moral obligation to seize control and protect the natural order of things for as long as we are able to slow the coming of hell on earth. Just like our right to shoot guns. Yee haw."
-
Just like our right to shoot guns Sadly or happily this one doesn't work in my country.
-
-
-
What I hear some acquaintances say is like "who cares, I'll go to the beach, turn the AC on, what's the big deal" .
As if the floods we had in Italy this year, or the wild fires, or the storms, or the draughts, or the Alps without snow, the glaciers disappeared, the sea turned green, the invasion of jellyfish weren't connected.
Some people, most people, are just too fucking stupid.
-
Don't forget crops. You can't eat heat.
-
Ask them if they'll be at the beach when it's 55c out and all the crops have died.
-
To be fair, I think both sides blow it out of proportion and that can stifle discussion. It won't be the "end of the world" where everyone will die, but we will have the "end of the world" as we know it.
I think one of the main points that need to be stressed to the kind of people in your example would be droughts.
Droughts will continue to get worse and will affect everyone. With a bad enough drought, we won't be able to feed entire cities. And that's when things really start to fall apart.
-
Yeah, people expect the earth to suddenly start cracking and spitting out hot lava or something.
No, it's gonna be a slow, steady march towards the end, just as it always has been. Slow enough that we feel like we can put it off for another day.
Slow enough that one day we will look up from our phones, see the oceans of fire and shrug. Too late now, just switch on the AC and go back to scrolling.
-
As an example of this, the North America wildfires this year don’t really seem to be due to climate change… but people keep tying the ideas together.
The extreme weather swings and the droughts are bad enough. And it is guaranteed to get worse. No reason to stretch the truth.
-
-
Ribbit
-
-
If you don’t choose to believe in it, it can’t hurt you. That’s verified fact
-
Phew, that's a load off my mind.
-
-
669 评论