We still get bills and charity letters for the previous owners 5 yrs later. Every one gets rts, no longer at this address, and we asked royal mail not to deliver stuff not addressed to us. Didn't make any difference
Have you ever heard a Golden eagle call? They hae a weak thin call, like a seagull. This isn't macho enough for the US, so they always play a different call on films, that of a hawk!
When there is no social safety net, and you need money to live you can't afford to be picky.
Forced to. People are forced into these jobs...
I think the humour in the first few episodes was Mcfarlens way of sneaking the show past the network suits - he sold it as family guy meets star trek, then switched on them once it was established.
In England it's illigal to keep a squirrel in captivity, but it's also illigal to release a captured squirrel back into the wild, so the only option is to (humanely) kill the poor fucker.
Like I said, it's a shame there's no way to avoid playing into 'their' hands and giving them all that extra revenue.
If only there were some way to avoid speeding....
I love how they say there are "tough decisions" to be made about benefits. You're going to cut benefits and cut taxes, same as you've been doing for the last 14 yrs, and any other time you had power. Why's it so tough? You should be really fucking good at it by now!
Yes, there is a difference, but it's barely perceptible, therefore it makes no difference which one is picked. If you actually have a preference go with that one. Otherwise flip a coin.
God damn you, that's all I can read now 😂
Nah, we have already exploited everything that can be easily exploited. Look at the effort we need to get new oil or metal deposits. Humans 2.0 will struggle to build basic machinery.
What a pointless question though. Obviously in the context 'Nazi' means what it means NOW.
'Peadophiles should be locked up' 'ah but what if the definition of Peadophile changes to incorporate anyone who has sex??'
In addition to the reply from the other chap, I'd point out that UEFA bought charges against city with absolutely no credible evidence and tried to ban them from competition. So I don't see how one could reach the conclusion that city bribed them?
What evidence do have for these well documented FFP failings?
You are correct, and the outcome of the hearing won't be known for a couple of years. However indications are that the PL is basing their charges on the Der Speigle documents (out of context, doctored emails stolen from MCFC and released by a convicteded fraudster and blackmailer). UEFA based their case on the same emails, and the CAS (European sporting appeal court) found that there was no veracity to them and no evidence of any wrong doing on MCFCs part, apart from non cooperation with UEFAs 'investigation'.
No they're not! They have the highest revenue in world football, and have one of the lowest 'net spends' (as useless as that metric is) of all the 'major teams' over the last 5 yrs. They are nowhere near failing FFP!