sabreW4K3 @ sabreW4K3 @lazysoci.al

Born and raised in London. Just a normal guy with a moral compass.

---

Read more

Posts

1,610

Comments

3,151

Joined

12 mo. ago

Moderating

---

Fucking King Kai, yeah!

Myles

Lewis

Skelly

Fucking yes!

Parteyyyyyyyyy

Fuck yeah!

Fuck!

Neville: "there's not too much in it"

It's a blatant foul you prick

Martinelli just broke my heart

I was just baffled by it

I'm not your pal, mate!

• Aegis
• Audire
• Binary Eye
• DavX5
• Droidify
• Image Toolbox
• Immich
• KDE Connect
• LibreOffice Viewer
• Muzei
• NextCloud
• Paperless Mobile

Live Video Chat should probably come from a dedicated app. Once the next generation of instant messenger is sorted out, video chat will probably quickly follow. I wouldn't be surprised to see live streams become popular once Dansup implements it in loops.

Thanks for pointing this out. I'm guessing part of this is why so many messengers either create a new protocol or choose XMPP

Wall of text? I provided information requested and then went back and provided more information to clear up a claim I got wrong. Let's not focus on how we get the information, but rather what the information is. If it's not for you personally, just move on.

I dunno then. Sorry, wish I could help.

Run

    
docker image prune -af
docker volume prune -af

  

From what I've read, it's been deemed quite expensive and so it's not feasible within the current database design.

I feel like I’m wasting my time replying to all these because it seems you didn’t even take the time to read them yourself.

I'm here trying to learn about Delta Chat and why you think it's a good app given the drawbacks of the approach they've taken. Over the years there's been an incredible amount of messengers pop up, 90 million from Google alone and none have opted for SMTP. There's surely a reason for that. From what I've learned, mostly thanks to Gemini, because holy fuck the Delta Chat website feels like something from 20 years ago and is purposely vague, the solution that Delta has gone for is just to add more layers. Again, something that the world has repeatedly opted against. I'm trying to understand why it's considered a good idea in this case and why so many teams and startups have decided not to use this methodology until now?

Jesus Christ, being curious shouldn't feel like a chore.

Downvote for what? What part is wrong?

Should definitely be the go-to