robinn @ robinn @lemmygrad.ml Posts 0Comments 6Joined 3 days ago
“Everything I don’t like is Russian and therefore evil (don’t ask how!!), btw I added the word ‘comrade’ to your point and now it’s invalid (RuZZian)!!”
“Everything’s an intellectual challenge with you!! I want to say nonsense that absolves Biden of carrying out genocide because Trump is doing the same thing but being more honest about it without any pushback and this is correct and good because um I can’t really defend my point but still want to make it!!”
Thought terminating cliché, unfortunalmente you're condemned to shut your eyes and plug your ears and scream "Russian propaganda" to avoid confronting how nonsensical your argument is until the end of time. Some reading for self-consciousness: https://redsails.org/masses-elites-and-rebels/
Both sources provided in this article about the election in venezuela come from the same website, which isn’t exactly clear of bias.
The “isn’t exactly clear of bias” nonsense was already addressed (and I would add “not unlike CNN and the BBC”), and the point is moot because the article presents multiple great reasons why it doesn’t matter (wrt US action, and this is what the article is about) if the election was internally rigged, but wrt the sources themselves, there is a bigger problem in sourcing where initial reporting of events is confused with analysis, analysis by sites/papers with “agendas” being dismissed out of hand because it doesn’t conform to the standards required for initial reporting. Whether Venezuelanalysis is biased (towards supporting the Venezuelan govt.) should be noted but isn’t enough to dismiss their articles, which rely heavily on other sources, leading to a web of direct sourcing for everything.
People from the votong polls collected the papers that provide information about the votes per political party, and it shows a clear win for the opposition.
Please take into account maduro forbid Maria Corina Machado from taking part in the election process.
We never learn, from the article you gave, exactly why she was forbidden from holding office (and therefore the election process) (not unilaterally by Maduro anyways), only that it was due to a “legal trick.” Reuters states, on the other hand: “A previous ban placed on her [due to corruption, which she denies] has been expanded because Machado supported sanctions by the United States on the Maduro government and backed former opposition leader Juan Guaido, the letter said.”
It’s a verifiable fact that she supported sanctions “on the Maduro government” (90% of sanctions stop right before they’re about to hurt the government and not the people!!), you can just scroll through her Twitter for proof of this (Ex.). Wrt the allegations of supporting Guaido, she has done this as well, blatantly and repeatedly, as her Twitter shows (Ex.), where the intricacies of any material support that opposition media has latched oto are irrelevant. Supporting coup attempts and supporting US economic terror against Venezuela, these are both justifiable reasons for preventing her from holding a govt. position.
Heh, bet you feel stupid now for criticizing the past president for doing something that the new president is continuing to do, heh. I'm smugly hypocritical and therefore correct.
“No administration has helped Israel more than I have. None. None. None." - Donald Trump (Click to Find Out More!!
Why does Egypt fear evacuating Gaza?
[*]
Truly I love falling for the same thing for (coming up on) a decade!!