pebbles @ pebbles @sh.itjust.works

Hey. Yeah you. No don't look over your shoulder. I'm not talking to the guy

---

Read more

Posts

28

Comments

383

Joined

8 mo. ago

It felt like that for me in a lot of Europe, but not America.

I'll clean up my room and hang a painting I made. Always feels nice to have a clean room.

Also it's been getting nicer so maybe I go on a bike ride. I'm a decently anxious fella and having energy go to my muscles rather than the glands that make stress hormones is very nice.

Dang you're right. Maybe we need to buy VHS porn for that. Or a Porn CD.

This is the coolest thing I read all day.

I think that assumes a fundamental difference between the ruling class and the proletariat that I don't think exists. Not to the extent that the "proletariat ruling class" would relinquish power more gracefully than the current one.

I'd say phasing into a system with no ruling class would be the ideal. Yk the whole "once everyone's super no one is." Kinda thing.

Here is link for ollama for Gemma 3 QAT https://ollama.com/eramax/gemma-3-27b-it-qat:q4_0

There are ggufs around if you want to try it on another back end.

Its from watching streamers I imagine.

I think the next bit of performance may be leaning hard into QAT. We know there is a lot of wasted precision in models, so the more we understand that during training the better quality small quants can get.

I also think diffusion LLMs ability to change previous tokens is amazing. As well as the ability to iteratively use an auto regressive LLM to increase output quality.

I think a mix of QAT and iterative interference will bring the biggest upgrades to local use. It'll give you a smaller higher quality model thay you can decide to run for even longer for higher quality outputs.

I'm pretty convinced it is just a bad set of models.

I'm waiting for qwq2 or something. Llama hasn't been my choice for a while.

So you kinda agree that even if morals objectively exists that we can't measure them with reasonable precision?

We'd have to have a strong grasp on the hard problem of consciousness. So there is no good reason to espouse objective morality in this day in age.

Yeah I'm totally om on board with this. It's filtering.

But that still doesn't mean communism. It may be socialism. Props to em for less inequality though.

You can't direguard anyone's humanity. Even billionaires. There are no universally bad people, negativity is always relational.

Though I do think you can weigh a billionaire's comfort against the folks they made billions from, and that may just be potent enough for the death penalty.

However, I don't think punishment is a humane solution. Rehabilitation and integration are always preferred. Though again, some folks integrate best as corpses.

I've not heard anyone call China communist for a while. At least not anyone trying to speak with accuracy about wealth distribution over there.

Thanks I joined!

Got ya thanks!

I am a guy and saw a general question about what tea folks recommend. I love tea and dont think my gender would get in the way of that discussion, but I understand that this is supposed to be a community with just women.

Do you recommend I stay out of discussions like that? There really isn't anyone talking about tea on Lemmy and I yearn for it.

No worries either way.

Thanks for sharing! I'm not perfect at this, but I try to keep the vibes welcoming.

Lemmy's more intimate and understanding vibes are its best features IMO.

I think I've been able to use secure boot with fedora. I didn't need to change any of my settings. But I build my PC myself, so there was never any windows specific config. I did dual boot at the start for a bit, but now I just have Linux on it.

Overall I doubt you need to change any BIOS settings. I'd just try to install and if you run into issues figure it out from there.