Every social media platform allows sex workers to exist to some degree. But they also have no problem with changing the rules and banning random sex workers and content, with zero transparency at all.
Right now reddit and twitter have a lot of great nsfw content, oftentimes posted directly from sex workers themselves.
But the actual people that run these platforms don't have a lot interest to keep nsfw alive on their platform. It's an afterthought at best and they won't be above making a full tumblr style purge to appease investors or ad companies.
Even OnlyFans of all platforms tried to do a nsfw purge.
A site like lemmynsfw, that has nsfw in its name, is very unlikely to rebrand itself into some family friendly hellhole anytime in the future in comparison.
on the plus side lemmynsfw is safe from admins that are hostile to nsfw in general. most social media platforms had a nsfw purge of some kind in the past.
making a second account for nsfw is what i do for the other platforms anyways. with most lemmy apps and some web frontends, using multiple accounts is pretty easy as well.
they removed themselves from a lot more conversations than simply the adorableporn one.
i don't think this is how the fediverse should work, you have a problem with one community, you block the entire instance for all your users.
From what i understand the blahaj admins had no problems with the other communities here, but the entire instance is blocked there now.
nsfw content is always an afterthought tho on social media and always gets cut down in some way for the greater platform. that's why i value the ability to make an account here a lot.
that comm has 2.1m members on reddit.
every poster already needs to prove that the person in the post is an adult and that the person posted these nsfw pics in full consent.
this community (adorableporn) is allowed on reddit and has 2.1m members there. why would you try to be more holy than the pope?
if it's ok for reddit and every ad company, then maybe this comm isn't that bad
maybe that admin was just flustered that their CSAM allegation was wrong and were unable to stop their demands from that point.
if that admin actually believes in their allegations: you can't ban young adults from presenting themselves in a sexpositive way.
aren't femboys also the same thing? it is a community of people that bases their identity on having youthful girlish looks. being "adorable" is also a goal of them.