Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)FH
Posts
0
Comments
8
Joined
3 mo. ago

  • Try Valibot. It is inspired by Zod.

    According to the Valibot FAQ, the main difference with Zod is:

    The functionality of Valibot is very similar to Zod. The biggest difference is the modular design of our API and the ability to reduce the bundle size to a minimum through tree shaking and code splitting. Depending on the schema, Valibot can reduce the bundle size up to 95% compared to Zod. Especially for client-side validation of forms and serverless environments this can be a big advantage.

  • I've tried both and I prefer Ultrawide for the following reasons:

    • Less cables. Cable management is already hard enough as it is.
    • No borders in between screens. Looks amazing when watching movies and for gaming.

    My current monitor is a GIGABYTE G34WQC.

  • You can try out Peer Calls. It's a peer-to-peer video and text chat that uses WebRTC, and is very lightweight. You can either use the flagship instance or self-host your own. One of the disadvantages is that text messages are not stored and are lost when the chat room is closed.

  • Ogrim is influenced by ALTCHA. Taking a quick glance, Anubis is a similar solution with some differences of solving the same problem:

    • Anubis sits between the target service and the reverse proxy, while Ogrim sits behind the target service.
    • One Anubis instance is needed per service, while a single Ogrim instance can be used for multiple services.
    • The target service does not need integration with Anubis. On the other hand, Ogrim and its services must be integrated to work.
    • Anubis will block search engine indexers, affecting the SEO of the target service. This is not the case with Ogrim.