No. Homicides have still raised by 15% in 2024. This is a graph of rate increase in homicides, not of homicides. It's the second derivative (see speed vs acceleration)
I suppose this is exactly the idea: sex assigned at birth. It's a somewhat aggressively neutral concept. Neutral because it just takes something that is already given independently from you. But also very stupid and backwards yeah.
Completely in line with bureaucratic standards. It doesn't judge but also can be a constant reminder of potential traumas.
Which one though? Is it Xi Jinping? Putin? Charles Taylor? Bush? Blair? Netanyahu? Ratko Mladic? Jean Kambanda? Samphan? Assad (not that old I suppose)?
There are so many of them
ETA: I see the downvotes. I truly have no fucking clue who you are talking about. Duterte? Lukashenko?
This one is real. When I was at work, I was the one driving the conversations. "Hey Chad, yesterday we reached a nice consensus about how everyone here hates people living with their parents. But I think we could expand a little bit by adding how much people who take a long time to finish uni are despicable. Yes Stacy? This is also something that bothers you constantly? Would you like to share your disgust?"
Is ChatGPT already able to mimic SO behaviour by answering "please research before asking dumb questions", "this should be obvious" and "closing, already answered somewhere else"?
Do you know how to get reviewed and published? I have a paper on hamster piss