That relies on the assumption that a dictatorship would follow the rules.

Underestimating the bed rail loading. I'd love to make a Ford joke, but let's be real, all truck beds would crumple like that.

More like they don't want the wider public to know it was them that donated. Some folks that are extremely wealthy go to great lengths to keep their names out of people's minds and stay out of the public eye as a matter of personal security.

Not only that, but the ability to transfer or even sell your license. If I can gift or sell a book or DVD, I should be able to do the same with a game or digital movie.

Watch it for the plot

In a row?!

Interesting. When I was there in 2022, most of the people there I talked about it with basically like it the way it is, especially considering that many individuals are not liable for federal income taxes.

Which states? Iirc most Puerto Ricans don't want statehood.

Probably to not burden smaller landlords with excess costs for reporting and infrastructure if I had to guess

They should be required to pay them a competitive rate

If the system was properly functional without these loopholes, they'd be forced to raise their rates to attract workers. But since they have a captive workforce, they're able to not worry about it

You cant justify 40% wage cost for transportation to the job.

Oh it's better than that: not only do they take a 40% cut of their wages, they charge fees on top of that 40% for transport and washing uniforms.

You can pay employees with cash legally, but it's a royal PITA and OP would still be "in the system" so to speak via income taxes and the like. The not-so-legal method would be for an employer to operate a cash-heavy business in which they'd basically take cash from the till and hand it directly to the employee, not recording either the income to the business or the dispersement to the employee. The issue can be that if the business doesn't operate with much cash on hand, they'd have to basically withdraw it from the ATM to give to OP, but (depending on how the business is structured) it would likely count as a personal dispersement to the business owner that they'd be taxed on and they wouldn't be able to claim it as a business expense, unless they did some fuckery with their books and run the risk of getting nailed by the IRS.

Right. I'm all for find a way to tip the balance of power away from the ownership class, but willful damage only screws you. Check your rental contract, a landlord can and will sue you for negligent and purposeful damage to their property. They'll also sing your rental history . Plus, if you're still living there, you're only inconveniencing yourself with the repair process.

Until your toilet stops up and floods dookie all over your stuff a week later

Ok calm down Satan, I still have to live here in the near future

There's still a PTSD-like reaction to the flavor of coconut, at least for me.

And a truckload of salt.

Honestly makes sense. As messed up as it sounds, it 100% must be cheaper for the city to offer a bus ticket out of town than to actually address why people are homeless. Capitalism is an asshole.

Probably because Jimbo and Cleetus would be too stupid to pass the test and disallowed their pewpews, and unfortunately these are very reliable voters, despite them not being able to spell republican or their own names, so a particular party keeps the status quo to remain in power.

Tracking homeless people is extremely difficult and where all the people once living on San Francisco’s streets have gone is impossible to know.

We all know where they went. Oakland and Richmond.