✨🫐🌷🌱🌌🌠🌌🌿🪻🥭✨ @ allo @sh.itjust.works

this page intentionally left blank

---

Read more

Posts

148

Comments

608

Joined

1 yr. ago

and imagine if we had 5 more hands; we could make 5 more points.

#thefuture

Just so you all know what his horrible crime was...

"Formally presenting the story at the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing at the University of Hong Kong (HKU) three days later, he said that the twins were born from genetically modified embryos that were made resistant to M-tropic strains of HIV.[48] His team recruited 8 couples consisting each of HIV-positive father and HIV-negative mother through Beijing-based HIV volunteer group called Baihualin China League. During in vitro fertilization, the sperms were cleansed of HIV. Using CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing, they introduced a natural mutation CCR5-Δ32 in gene called CCR5, which would confer resistance to M-tropic HIV infection."

So imagine a couple where one has HIV but they really want to have a baby. He basically made it so their children were hiv free and then immunized them (edited for accuracy). In all my Crispr research, this is the story that most caused me to feel the science system had wronged a good person. Literally Lulu and Nana can grow up healthy now. Science community smashed him, but to the real people he helped he is basically a saint. I love now seeing him again and seeing he still has his ideals. Again, fuck all those science boards and councils that attacked him. Think of the actual real couple that just wants a kid without their liferuining disease. Also I love how he isnt some rightwing nutjob nor greedy capitalist. See his statement about this tech should be free for all people and he will never privately help billionaires etc etc.

anyway, ideals. i recognized them when i first came across him; i recognize them now. I know enough about him that I will savagely defend this guy. He isn't making plagues or whatever. He is helping real people.

i think just switching the word Generative to something else is enough. The issue is tons of ai stuff use generative, generate, generator...

my type of guy. And he still does his research to help people even with the public treating him like it does.

I'd like to get in to genetic engineering. When I came across his story while researching crispr, I sympathized with him. He did the experiment in what to me is a moral way. Just going on memory it was like 'take 4 embryos, edit two, keep parents in the loop and ask which embryo they want'. Complain all you want, but he did no wrong; it's the public and system that then wronged him. So yeah, of nearly anyone, he is the one who most gets to say 'ethics ruining science'. It's ironic because there are tons and tons of unethical science activities done literally every day. But for those to be ignored and instead ethics police to hit him when he did all his stuff morally and resulted probably in two extrahealthy kids... Yeah I agree with him. I think everything should be done morally, but if he is going to be hit like that under the guise of 'ethics' then nah. 'ethics' needs to be replaced by morals and decency. Literally horrifically murdering people (war) is legal and accepted while him using science, AND CORRECTLY, to protect people from liferuining diseases got the treatment it did? nah. I hope he continues growing and doing more genetic engineering and this time doesn't share a single thing with the public. He should never give the people that treated him like that a single piece of data. There are ways to bypass the patent thickets if he isn't selling what he does, especially if he shares no info about it. I support him.

prepares for 200 downvotes

im trying to do this :)

no meat or dairy seems much much healthier than trying to deal with inflammation

will try again starting tonight thank you

tru. most of the ones mentioned here ive never seen anything negative about (tho havent checked all their mod logs). yeah maybe to say 'best' is less accurate than 'among the handful that are the best' (or mouthful if one has no hands)

ty

i am not sure what chuffing noise you are talking about.

I know pits and shortsnout breeds do different vocalizations than my longsnout dogs.

The signs my dogs make that dont involve tongue or tail for similar emotions are:

• the butt up chest down stretch
• the aforementioned shake
• deep breath
• an mhm breath which can be nuanced to mhmhmhmhm occasionally

i know the first three have an aspect of innateness because i have seen disconnected dogs do the same for the same sort of experience. I am unsure of the mhm because i have not seen dogs outside my own culture of dogs do it so it may be cultural. They may or may not idk. Don't know the chuffing tho

because it just is and anyone who believes anything different from what i believe is wrong

true. of course im only speaking of my own dogs and those i've met. if not removing water or dirt from coat, it is done when: a friend comes by, after getting a treat, sometimes if they know a treat is coming, a song they like plays, someone treats them nicely, they just had a good experience, they like what i or someone else does, they are reassuring after a scuffle or something questionable that 'everything is fine'... I agree it isn't exactly a yes. It definitely feels closer to a yes than a no tho. I would say it isnt a Yes so much as a confirmation of good.

thanks. secretly that's what i thought :)

just pee directly in to the Power Bank

i always appreciate your comments

Looks like someone hasnt been following current events :)

makes sense. So it is partly BECAUSE the people are accused of gang and hezbolah affiliation that it is extra controversial instead of being less controversial; with the reason being lack of evidence and fair trial, and that that shouldnt even start to be ok

personally im surprised the trump administration is even giving reasons for deporting people

that's a great point, thank you!

even without it being a risk to self that sounds immoral.

Why are all these big deportation stories about hezbolah people and gang members that we are supposed to be sympathizing with and vocally defending?

The AntiDeportation stories I would like to support are like 'nice mom that is just nice and not part of any gang nor anything illegal deported horribly from her 5 nice kids'. Give us those stories please. I am totally happy not having gang member neighbors. Why would I want that or sympathize with them?

the mom that worked in the big illegal weed op is the closest so far. I am totally for weed and in a place it's legal, but I understand that, if she makes money on the smuggling of weed from legal to illegal places, it will be bad for her when she's caught. That was not controversial to me. It shouldnt be that way, but it wasnt unusually controversial.

are there no actual innocent nice people being immorally deported? That seems crazy to me, but where are the stories?