I already like the new style because contestants can upvote each other on the submission phase without it being strategically unsound.
Mine is a bit unusual. I'm laying here in my little house with the people down below being not my type of people and one having blamed one of my beautiful, sacred creatures (canine) for something she didn't do. So I visualize spatially me ~us sacred folk, staying exactly where we are while a beautiful rain dances Down from heaven. It feels beautiful for us ~while a torrential wash unstoppably sweeping away all below.
Transcribing this energy in to prompt, we type: "we stay here basking in the beautiful magical rain while the torrential downpour washes away those we dislike"
And this image appears.
It is beautiful and gentle, and in the picture there is only good. I look at this and think how it has a greater destiny ~just like you.
It is the focus for our manifestation
and here is it's destined place.
๐ง๏ธโจโ๏ธ๐ฟโ๏ธโจ๐ง๏ธ
https://sh.itjust.works/post/25716230 here's merde's recent post. I would like to ask that 'not sharing prompt results in less points' be looked at and possibly changed. Not all of us have the same image making process and some of us vary significantly. My own process is different from merde's, but also 'when i create an image with a logical, on topic, shareable prompt', as I do for most of the challenges, it often is a subpar image compared to if I had created the image naturally, in my own style.
details
my generator is like a witches brew where what is thrown in may have little to do with what is generated. It cares about maximum beauty and that the result is beautiful matters more than closeness to prompt. I could type 'unicorn' and my image have no unicorns and be, instead, a perfect space scene for the challenge. Because promptsharing is tied to points, I often, instead, submit worse pictures but with a legit prompt.
It is weird to me that this aspect of points is tied to what the person's personal style is, and I think that shouldn't be the case.
at least earth has a second moon by then (according to the picture)
prompt
(((((Space))) (colorful galaxies))) (((((dreamlike))))) (((Aetheric))) (((absolutely beautiful))) glowing smiling intricately ((((((detailed))))) high definition beautiful beautiful lighting masterpiece dramatic pose sleek detailed ((beautiful face)) exquisite detail backlit absolute masterpiece iridescent beautiful details heartwarming glorious exotic exquisite beautiful colors 8k (((((unique))))) ((radiant)) Dream (((paradise))) futuristic ancient creative and dreamy enlightened in the styles of the artists William Turner, Enki Bilal, Sylvain Sarrailh, Jae Lee, Jim Lee, Piotr Foksowicz, Enki Bilal, Anders Zorn, Mike Deodato, Loish Lois Van Baarle, Filip Hodas, Andrew Macara, ((masterpiece)), ((best quality)), high quality,in the styles of the artists William Turner, Enki Bilal, Sylvain Sarrailh, Jae Lee, Jim Lee, Piotr Foksowicz, Enki Bilal, Anders Zorn, Mike Deodato, Loish Lois Van Baarle, Filip Hodas, Andrew Macara, ((masterpiece)), ((best quality)), high quality,
The 'detailed' in tons of parentheses looks promising from how it affected this picture.
FOE OF TEH GARDENS!
prompt: "a villainous caterpillar dressed as a bee (fashion show) ((stylish))"
Prompt: (((((๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ฅญ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ฅ ๐ซ ๐ซ ๐ ๐ฅฅ ๐ ๐ถ๏ธ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐ง ๐ฝ ๐ฅฆ ๐ฅ ๐ฅฌ ๐ซ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ ๐ง ๐ฅ ๐ซ ๐ฐ ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐ฅ ๐ฅฏ ๐ง ๐ฅ ๐ณ ๐ฅ ๐ง ๐ฅ ๐ฅฉ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ญ ๐ฅช ๐ฅจ ๐ ๐ ๐ซ ๐ฎ ๐ฏ ๐ฅ ๐ง ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ฅซ ๐ซ ๐ฅ ๐ฒ ๐ ๐ ๐ฆช ๐ฅฃ ๐ฃ ๐ฅก ๐ ๐ฑ ๐ฅ ๐ข ๐ ๐ฅง ๐ฆ ๐จ ๐ง ๐ฅฎ ๐ฅ ๐ก ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ฐ ๐ฎ ๐ ๐ง ๐ญ ๐ฌ ๐ซ ๐ฉ ๐ช ๐ง ๐ง ๐ฟ ๐ง ๐ง ๐ฏ ๐ฅ ๐ต โ ๐ซ ๐ง ๐บ ๐ป ๐ฅ ๐พ ๐ท ๐ฅ ๐ธ ๐น)))))
what have you made with emojis so far?
yes. tho i dont know what you mean by font symbols; so possibly actually no
I learned about it months ago but without exploring in to it.
The creative exploration is starting today :)
her neck is too long in the second pic imo.
(i constantly have to weed images that have too long necks even tho i negativeprompt against it.)
Interestingly for me guidance seems to have less of an affect than resolution. Idk if this is different in different versions of SD but only landscape images reliably makes both balls.
Square almost never does
and portrait also very rarely tho slightly more often than square
โงโจ๐ฟAllo๐ฟโจโง @sh.itjust.works can be found here https://perchance.org/beautiful-people