That’s the benefit of a third party App Store. Zero control. Zero moderation. If I want to host a Bitcoin miner and let people install it then that’s totally my right.
If you want out of date apps removed then I think you’d like iOS or the play store.
Off topic but I never see articles posted here about what the new features in Android are going to be, but Apple haters will undoubtedly let me know what I can expect to see in iOS.
Don’t second guess the willingness of an Apple-hater to spend that much time dissecting something bad Apple has done.
Sounds like a shitty friend. Idk why your comment is relevant
Be an iPhone enjoyer and defend Apple here on Lemmy.
There’s no beating the hive mind.
Ah I see. It is the chocolate industry’s turn to have an existential shortage crisis, jacking up prices never to come back down.
MBAs sure are smart for coming up with this one to keep up the charade of perpetual growth.
Ah, I see a comment with downvotes here and I know it’s a rational one I should be paying attention to.
Things work, but they feel entitled to forcing Apple to dedicate their resources to offering the same experience to people who don’t do business with Apple.
Forcing a business to operate better with another competitor for no benefit of their own is a dangerous precedent to set.
But does it work? Can you, as an Android user, send text messages to and from people with iPhones?
So you’re saying iPhones are as important to humanity as the internet and should be equally regulated as such?
Look at this comment with -20 downvotes and tell me this place isn’t an echo chamber filled with one way to think.
https://sh.itjust.works/comment/10163765
I’ll take Reddit’s shitty practices over this place’s community.
Don’t feel bad about the downvotes, normal people understand how this should have never happened in the first place but terminally online nerds will defend Mozilla to their dying breath.
And the fact this wasn’t caught sooner means Mozilla doesn’t do any due diligence and aren’t to be trusted being a privacy-focused business.
Look at how downvoted you are for stating this simple fact. Lemmy is a fucking dumpster fire.
Is it so hard to understand that people feel burned by a paid-for service that promised better privacy actually selling out your info because Mozilla didn’t do the bare basic due diligence?
Breaking up before or after they were doing business with OneRep? Because they should have caught this before any of their customers ever paid for it.
What did I fail to understand? That Mozilla didn’t do their due diligence and went into business with this person and only dropped them after damage to their customers was already done?
Let me be clear for your simple mind: Mozilla would have caught this if they looked into their business partners, but they failed to do that. So they lost my trust.
looking for the best product
And the best browser right now is Arc, which just opened up their Windows Beta to the public.
I’ve come to the conclusion that Lemmy is a dumpster fire filled with terminally online nerds living in their mom’s basement. It’s even worse than Reddit.
Like Mozilla offered a paid service designed to protect your privacy that just made your privacy worse than if you did nothing at all, and these NEETs want you to think it’s okay because they fired the company after the damage was already done.
And you’ll get mass downvotes for saying that’s a shitty thing to do.
Yes, and they never should have been in that position to begin with. Mozilla’s extreme lack of due diligence has lost my trust for every other service they offer. Is that so hard to understand? Or is your head so far up Mozilla’s ass that you can’t see the obvious?
Stealing is bad but don’t expect Reddit outcasts to be supportive of this simple concept.
Context: Salaried employee living in California, working for a fully-remote software startup.
After two years on-call is being implemented. It’s unpaid, and mandatory. With current rotations I’m looking at 10 weeks per year. On-call was not previously required, nor does it appear in my employment contract.
I’ve done some reading and it appears that as long as there aren’t overt restrictions to movement then unpaid uncall is fine.
However, they’re expecting 10-15 minute response times and you always being in a location with internet service.
Additionally, these text alerts are expected to be setup on our personal devices and phone plans. The company does not contribute towards these costs, nor do they issue work phones.
Does that constitute as overly restrictive? And if so, do I have a case?