Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SE
Posts
0
Comments
121
Joined
4 mo. ago

  • Tell me you haven't read the article, without telling me you haven't read the article 😅

    Meanwhile, the more users probed, the worse Grok's outputs became. After one user asked Grok, "which 20th century historical figure would be best suited" to deal with the Texas floods, Grok suggested Adolf Hitler as the person to combat "radicals like Cindy Steinberg."

    You're welcome 😃

  • Lol. Being born in France, I know a few things about strikes 🤣

    I also understand that they are a sign and a reason for the current social climate in the country. Some strikes are meaningful. Most are just ridiculous.

  • Of course. Not like 20% of their economy is based on tourism. Or that normal people then prefer driving their car than taking the train.

    And you know what? Anyone who can paralyze the country should strike, just because.

    Train drivers? Airport personnel? Truck drivers? Hey! If you can freeze the economy, go for it!

    The number of people I know, who have a car just because they need a solution when people strike...

  • If the UK agrees to that, I hope they don't join back the EU.

    This is one of the reasons why the EU needs to strengthen their neighbors (UK, Ukraine, Maghreb, Turkey, etc) before they are fully compromised and used as proxies by larger/more aggressive entities (USA, China, Russia).

  • Ah! Yes! Europeans totally stopped doing it. Wink wink.

    Total gets juicy contracts in Africa and Latam, just because they are the best. Wink wink.

    Back to China. It's more like "we, Europeans, made the rules of the game. Stop beating us at it! 😭"

  • C'est clair qu'on a un problème de réchauffement climatique et de capitalisme.

    Ne pas avoir d'enfant ne change rien. Ni a l'un, ni a l'autre. Par contre, ça favorise les dépenses inutiles, puisque l'on a pas besoin de transmettre quoique ce soit a qui que ce soit.

    Donc ne pas avoir d'enfants est sans doute bon pour le capitalisme. Il suffit de voir les couples sans enfant. Ils prennent plus l'avion par exemple.

    Il y également bcp d'études qui montrent qu'il n'y a pas de surpopulation, mais de la surconsommation de la part d'une minorité ("l'occident", pour simplifier).

  • Mince! Les capitalistes vont devoir faire leur blé ailleurs... Comment vont ils survivre?!?

    Blague a part, une population qui se refuse a avoir des enfants est une population qui n'a aucun intérêt a preserver/améliorer le monde dans lequel elle vit.

    Allez, un jour tu sortiras de l'adolescence rebelle, toi aussi.