Skip Navigation
Steam does the opposite of forcing Arbitration on its users
  • What I meant by cents on the dollar is usually, they broke rules, make $100 billion from it (imaginary scenario), and then the settlement from that wrong doing sees them pay out $2 billion to the affected customers that joined the class. It may be due to the fact that I've not paid attention to too many class action suits, but it seems like the settlement never comes close to the harm they caused.

  • Steam does the opposite of forcing Arbitration on its users
  • I can tell you that I have arbitration on going, and it's been well over a year that it has been happening. To assume that the arbitration wraps up in a month, when you've got lawyers involved is non-sense. I don't believe arbitrators are in anyone's pocket either. The arbitrators aren't in-house council for Valve, they are a company Valve has contracted with, and they're going to be neutral, and rule based on law, not who's paying. As a lot of arbitration rules state that if you take the case to arbitration and lose, the one that is ruled against pays for the cost of the arbitration. Based on the "mate's rates", I'm guessing you're UK based. I don't know that legal system, so can't say how fee structures work. But a great deal of lawyers that are suing on behalf of you, in the US, take a percentage of the settlement. So the biggest cost is all to the person being sued, as they do pay the lawyers by the hour instead of a cut of the ruling.

    I don't think Valve is changing their rules to screw customers, I think they're doing it because they've found separating each case into a different arbitration claim is too expensive. And it would have been better for them all to be in one group. I believe Valve is the best game distributor, as it turns out. But if people with law degrees think they've broken rules, I'm all for punishing rule-breaking. In this particular scenario, it seems like it might slightly improve things for consumers, and greatly benefit small studios.

  • Steam does the opposite of forcing Arbitration on its users
  • If you push everybody into a class action, it will be cheaper. Have you ever gotten more than a cent on the dollar from a class action settlement(unless you're the class representative)? Sure the seem like the settlements are a lot of money, but if you can get the class action settled with very few claimants, no one will be able to sue over that particular issue again, so it puts it behind the company. Instead of being dogged by individuals for however long.

  • This is my deck, but this is not my cat...
  • My family also ended up with a clipped ear cat. She came up to us one night, and was friendly, then for the next two weeks she showed up everyday we got home from work. So, now she's our inside cat, and we all love her, she is so friendly to everyone. Even followed an AC tech around the house trying to get love from him too. One of the best cats I've ever had.

  • That door must be very heavy
  • In an imaginary scenario, if I go to sell my house, and know that I've got a 400k loan to pay off and the house is worth around 400k, I'm going to factor in what I have to pay the agents and set it for 420k (assuming 2.5% for both selling and buying agents to split). I'm not going to be walking away from that still owing money to the bank.

    The prices always factor in how much will be going to the agent(s). You will not accept a price that is below what you need.

  • I think everyone should listen to Taylor Swift.
  • Well, you've got my upvote, since this is unpopular opinion. I don't hate her music, I just find it so bland. Like faster speed elevator music. I'm not trying to hate on her, or say you're wrong for liking her music, but I am part of "everyone" and I don't care to listen to it.

  • Grumpy Kneading
  • Very curious what fur that is. I can't think of an animal that is orange at the tips but has a black under coat. Looks to big to be fox, but feel like that's red/white.

  • It's called a wedding ring, but surely it should be called a marriage ring
  • I am curious what region you're from. I would guess it's outside of the US, but perhaps there's an area that differs from the norm I've experienced.

    If you are indeed outside the US, I'm guessing it's the American tradition of engagement rings, without the tradition of continuing to wear the engagement rings. That truly would be a (bigger) waste of money.

  • It's called a wedding ring, but surely it should be called a marriage ring
  • Wait, do you know women that stop wearing their engagement ring after they're married? Every married woman I've met (that doesn't have a hands based labor job) wears the engagement and wedding ring. All the women in my family have them soldered together some time after, so they don't independently spin on the finger.

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)JI
    Jikiya @lemmy.world
    Posts 0
    Comments 102