Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)EP
Posts
1
Comments
20
Joined
2 mo. ago

  • They were asking Deepseek, an LLM model developed in China, because they were curious what limits might be baked into it by its makers. I imagine that if they were testing an American made AI, they would instead ask it about things an American company would be likely to censor.

  • A lot of it isn't new, or is new but wasn't published because it was redundant at the time. Everyone who wasn't wearing blinders already knew Trump is a pedo creep who was best friends with Epstein. Now, finally, thanks to Trump's broken promise on releasing "the Epstein files," those blinders are off, or at least weakened and so it's actually worthwhile to put this stuff out there again. Framing it like it's some new revelation will get some of the people who ignored it before to maybe consider it this time around.

  • Pointless nitpick: I don't think he's wearing a bald cap, it really looks like the guy partially shaved his head for the bit. That takes some real commitment to do that just to call out the hypocrisy of someone being also shitty.

  • Wow, this takes me back. This was one of my favorite sets to play with, and I had forgotten it. I was always a little disappointed that the magnet arm couldn't actually reach the little magnet cargo box in the base. I usually put the robot on the torso-docking hover-platform, and the human in the head/spaceship, on account of the human being safer in an enclosed cockpit, while the robot was less at risk riding exposed to the vacuum of space. I also added some upgraded thrusters to the head from some other set so it could fly faster when detached.

  • It wasn't the user's infrastructure, it was the LLM company's. The selling point is that it's all integrated together for you. You explain what you want, the LLM not only codes it, but launches it too. Yes, his screen shots of the LLM "taking responsibility" are idiotic, but so many people don't understand that LLMs don't actually understand anything.

  • "Basically their methodology was that they asked ChatGPT whether the job could be automated," he explained. "They also asked people whether the job could be automated and then they said ChatGPT and people agreed some portion of the time."

    lol. This is such an idiotic thing to do. "Hey, you know that linguistic pattern matcher that doesn't actually reason or introspect? Since it can talk, why don't we just ask it what it can and can't do?" Seeing this, published by an AI research institute no less, is what inspired the creators of the actually riggourus test the article is about. It inspired me with a desire to smack those idiots upside their empty heads.

  • People think the stem is too tough, but it just needs to be cooked right. The trick is to start cooking the stem pieces first, then when they just start to be cooked, add the florets. Exact timing depends on the cooking method, but if done right all of it will be tender and tasty.

  • Lemmy Shitpost @lemmy.world

    Seriously, it was all the rage back when I joined my first instance.

  • Yeah, our town's protest yesterday had a pretty big proportion of veterans in attendance. Even if the parade was actually to honor the troops instead of stroking Trump's ego, it would still hardly make up for slashing access to veteran's medical benefits, the numerous times he's desparaged POWs and those who died in service, or him now sending troops to follow illegal orders against US civilians on US soil.

  • Yeah, this really depends on what you meant by winning here. Are we actually changing the other person's mind or do they admit we are right, but still believe otherwise? Are people who witness the argument included? Do people continue to agree indefinitely? Does it change reality to match?