Imo they were sabotaging themselves with their lack of queso and still are with the poor distribution of ingredients in the burrito. I get my mexican food from real mexican restaurants, but even Moe's is better than Chipotle and they should be ashamed of that.
"Oh what a coincidence now that you cancelled on me I'll be doing the same thing (well mine's a gameboy and I'm walking not scrolling but same same), wanna just combine forces on that and maybe touch butts?"
(Sort of a side note, but) I would argue that guns are designed to fire a projectile. That's it, nothing more. The other stuff comes in externally: What are you firing at, and why?That is what determines if you're hunting, target shooting, competing, murdering, self defensing, etc.
If you're firing a projectile at an animal for food? Hunting. At paper for practice? Target shooting. At paper for a good score compared to others? Competing. At people who aren't trying to kill you? Murdering. At people who are? Self defense. All depends on how you're using it.
Hell I'm a man and I stayed dating a woman I should have left (because she was abusive) because I couldn't have done without her part of the rent at the time. Shit happens ig. Got a new job and now I'm able to afford it alone, she's gone, shit rules.
Heads up that stat is disingenuous. It was taken during covid (which contributed to a decline in the true cause, auto fatalities), included "children ages 0-19" (some of which are decidedly not legally children), and only took place in a few major cities (IIRC NYC, LA, CHI, BAL, and one or two more I can't recall because it's been 5+yr,) all cities known for their gang problems. Gangs which often ensnare kids as young as elementary school to deliver packages, but it usually starts to get more violent at ~15-18. Most of the kids shot were involved in that life, which is still a problem yes, but it's usually spun as if 5yos are mostly dying from school shootings, which simply isn't the case and the methodology was flawed to give that false impression. If they'd have done it with a wider sample it likely would have still been car crashes even then, and it's certainly back by now.
Yeah good call, idek your company, site, or industry, and I don't need to. As someone who has to deal with the same shit from a customer perspective I can't hate it enough.
Professional websites should all aspire to be like McMaster-Carr's, "you know why you are here why should we bug you with bullshit, now what size roll pins did you need?" Literally one of my favorite websites of all time, no muss no fuss.
274 justifiable homicides involving a private citizen using a firearm
Ok, and how many defensive uses of a firearm occurred that year where the defender did not kill the attacker? Cases where the attacker was merely injured, or the defender missed, or the attacker ran off at the sight of the firearm? Why are those entirely omitted, does it only count as self defense if the attacker dies, not if one successfully stops the attack without a justifiable homicide?
And while we're at it, how many justifiable homicides occurred that year with your defensive weapon of choice, The Hammer? If the metric used to determine a weapon's viability for defense is simply justifiable homicides/yr, blind bet: it's less than 274.
Btw
only 1.1 percent of victims of attempted or completed violent crimes used a firearm,
While around 45% of people owna gun, only 21% of people carry a gun ever, and even less carry everywhere always, and this figure doesn't take into account whether or not the victims had a gun on them with which to defend themselves. This stat is entirely meaningless without controling for that.
and only 0.3 percent of victims of attempted or completed property crimes used a firearm.
Well that's illegal unless you're in Texas at night, so, unless that's all they're counting this makes me further question the voracity of the study. You're telling me that 0.3 percent of people in the study successfully justifiably killed someone for something that is illegal to kill people for? That's not how this works lol.
Thanks for posting the list this week! Completely forgot since it's been so fucked at work lol.
Well let's see here..
Toxic Avenger Comics #1 - Been digging the Toxic Avenger series so far actually. I hope they do a Sgt. Kabukiman eventually but that's probably not gonna happen lol.
Archie Meets Jay And Silent Bob #1 - WAT? Uhhh I may pick this up...I guess? Wild.
Beneath The Trees Where Nobody Sees Rite Of Spring #1 - It's here! If the first run was the 80s, the prequel was the 70s, and this one is the 90s, all still following everyone's favorite serial killer, Sam. Absolutely can't wait for this one.
I Hate Fairyland #42 - Big list for me this week, huh? Well this is the last one on it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inAuHHpy8po