Skip Navigation
103 comments
  • Being real, it depends on what people think marriage is.

    There's multiple concepts out there, which may or may not conflict with each other.

    What really matters is the people involved agreeing on which concepts they will be engaging in. That's the truth no matter if it's arranged or not.

    Now, when arranged = forced, that's some fucked up shit. But the two aren't inherently the same thing.

    When it comes right down to it, "marriage" is just a word for a formalized union between people that is recognized by the community/state. How the people involved get there is kinda meaningless. A carefully arranged marriage in a culture where marriage is done for practical reasons is no worse of a concept than two random drunks in vegas getting hitched just because. It's not even a worse concept than two people that love each other choosing to formalize their bond (and it doesn't even have to be romantic love, good friends can sometimes a marriage make).

    I'm not saying the culture in Afghanistan is good or bad. I do have my doubts that the marriages arranged are done so in a healthy and equitable manner, but that's a separate issue from assuming that arranged marriages are somehow a relic of the past and that it should die out. They still exist because people want them to.

  • I don't understand why marriage is a thing at all any more. I view it like a form of slavery, as unpopular as that may seem to some. Like the whole spend a ton on a special day bullshit is a nonsense way for most people to start their lives in any part of the world. A dowry is a slave payment. Any disproportionate mismatch of income or roles should just be a reason to part ways, or come to some kind of agreement between those two individuals only. If two people are incompatible, or unable to compel one another to stay, they shouldn't.

    I look at it as various stages of human social evolution where some areas are closer to outright partnership slavery and some are slightly less. Very few people live with true equality and expectations in partnerships.

    • It’s not clear to my why you draw parallels with slavery. Spending a massive sum on the days is not an intrinsic prerequisite for marriage, neither is a dowry.

      All marriage is, is a formal public oath between two people to spend the rest of their lives together, to look after each other and to share resources.

      As an institution, it has many benefits including to the married people’s health. It also negefurs the state in that the mutual commitment to care it tends to reduce healthcare and social costs. So the state may provide some benefits.

      The main disadvantage is that she stacks the dishwasher wrong.

      • The oath is a crutch for many and used as a leverage point. As a disabled guy with nothing to offer anyone, I have every reason to view marriage as the opposite, but I don't. It's not right to view a partnership as an oath in my opinion it implies a safety that makes no sense. A relationship is work. There is no right to the rest of someone's life on either side should they change their mind or evolve in different directions; that is slavery. A relationship has no right of ownership over another person under any circumstances. If you want to go, you have the autonomy to do so. I'm fiercely loyal myself and form close relationships, but I have no right to say "I'm done" or hold any leverage over another person. I will ask them no to leave, I will make my case why they shouldn't, but I have no right to stop them. This is true equality and freedom. It is a fundamental human right.

    • This is really narrow minded.

      The term "arranged marriage" does not imply that the participants are not willing and eager. It's not a disney story.

103 comments