hmmmm
hmmmm
hmmmm
I take the square root of the negative trolley, then use my imaginary streetcar to establish a complex track so I can start killing in an additional dimension.
Multi-axis drifting!?!?
Deja Vu!
Aw, yeah, that's sick! I also choose this option.
It's always better to gain a full understanding of the system when trying to make important decisions.
The trolley has two sets of wheels, leading and trailing, both of which must remain on the same set of tracks.
The switch is designed to enable the trolley to change course, moving from one set of tracks to the other.
Throwing the switch after the leading set has passed, but before the trailing set has reached the switch points will cause the two sets to attempt travel on separate tracks. The trolley will derail, rapidly coming to a halt. If the trolley is moving slowly enough to permit this action, nobody dies.
Source: former brakeman (one of the people responsible for throwing switches), section hand (one of the people responsible for installing switches), and railroad welder (one of the people responsible for field repairs of switches).
I'm pretty sure that leads to multi-track drifting, and so all the people die.
Source: https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/000/727/DenshaDeD_ch01p16-17.jpg
This is quintessential anime action. So ridiculous, yet so awesome.
🤣
Don't worry, the first body or two will take care of it!
I'm no expert, but I'd expect such a slow moving trolley to eventually derail itself anyway on account of all the corpses
Yes, or come to a halt. You'd be surprised at how little it takes to reduce the already low friction to nothing. A bit of blood and a bit of resistance will bring it to a halt pretty quickly.
I think you just passed the Trolley version of the Kobayashi Maru. Well done.
Thanks. This is the first time I've seen a jokey enough presentation to feel comfortable in treating it as a hypothetical reality rather than a moral/ethical exercise.
Way to stop the trolly problem dead in its tracks.
dead
ha
OR... if you can keep the wheels spinning really fast, you could "drift" the trolly, keeping a set of wheels on each track and kill everyone on both tracks into infinity.
If the leading wheels are allowed to continue any interval down the original track, uncountably infinitely many people die.
I would question the ability to line people up on a railroad track such that they have a 1:1 correspondence with the real numbers.
It's totally doable because they are real people.
Arbitrary precision engineering
just use a well ordering of the reals and you should be fine
The real question for me is what unit of distance would be used for the integer representation… It could take 1 meter, 1 Km, 1 Au, or even 1 Infinity to represent the distance between every person and the next. Also, are we using a linear or logarithmic scale?
This is not to mention the lack of info on how fast the train is going, and whether or not it’s accelerating.
Has anyone tried just asking the trolley to stop?
Or stopped the person who keeps tying all these people to the trolley tracks?
Or trying to understand its innate desire to kill?
It has tasted blood, it's too late to reason with it
In these scenarios the trolly is too close to stop before running the victums over.
Although in this particular time, having the trolly stop would save an infinite number of lives compared to the casulaites, which would actually help it stop fatser as bodies do not make good railroad tracks [citation needed].
It is my understanding that the trolley just wants to go forward. It doesn't care whether it kills people or not.
Therefore, make the trolley go in circles.
Or in reverse
Found the Canadian!
Sorry, that's only an option of you have a Pro subscription.
At any point in time, a finite amount of time has passed, and the trolley has killed a finite amount of people. The correct track is the one that, at any given time, will have killed fewer people. Unless the trolley speeds up to account for that and always kills n people per second, the top track will result in less deaths over any period of time.
The straight ahead track actually kills an infinite number of people every interval of time.
The tram travels at light speed and so time no longer flows for you. You exist in a singular moment of splattergore.
But even light speed is finite for the people on the track. It's only the tram that stops experiencing time.
Also, you're not on the tram. You're standing at the switch.
All trolleys to date have been finite. A trolley which can kill an infinite number of people would truly be a marvel of engineering.
Every finite trolley passes infinitely many points when moves, if you accept space as infinitly divisible (structured as the real numbers).
The train tracks are linear time on Earth. It's basically the choice between letting people be killed or dying of old age.
Assuming that it takes some amount of energy to kill one person, and that the trolley doesn't have an engine with infinite power, choosing the bottom track would save lives. The trolley would have to expend an infinite amount of energy to move any distance from the starting point, so it would just get stuck there while trying to crush the unimaginable amount of people bunched up in front of it.
But getting anywhere on the lower track will kill infinitely many people. You cannot kill finitely many people on the lower track. Well, unless you derail at exactly the first. On the upper track, a stop at any point will have killed only finitely many.
One person can only be on the spot for one number. As soon as more than one gets killed, that would mean that the trolley has traversed some distance, which implies that it has killed an infinite number of people. That is impossible in any finite timespan under the aforementioned assumption. Thus the only logical conclusion is that it gets stuck after the first person is killed, at the exact spot the first number is mapped to.
I guess there could also be a different solution when you look at the problem from a different angle. Treating infinity with this little mathematical care tends to cause paradoxes.
Pulling the lever will kill people slower, therefore less deaths in the lifetime of the universe.
Fewer deaths
Gram
So I won't do it
Or will leaving it cause the higher density of bodies to slow the trolley resulting in slower killing in the lifetime of the universe... which either way is infinite deaths?
Move to the end of the track and undo the constraints of people on the track. You will have infinite time until the trolly reaches the end, and can thusly save infinite lives by doing so.
Sadly, it takes an infinite amount of time to reach the end of the track. Thankfully, you have infinity time, though it's still inconvenient. An infinite number of people people will die (instead of an infinite number of people), but you'll save an infinite number of people in the end. After an infinite amount of time that will be infinitely better!
An infinite track has no end, just like a number line.
Actually, that's assuming that the track is a straight line. The distance from the beginning to the end of the track could be just a few feet, and the distance along the rail and thusly the number of people infinite.
Pull the lever, thus killing -1/12th people.
Killing -1/12th? I didn't know it can revive people.
That trolleys going to derail eventually. So the one with more people since they are tightly packed and it can't build momentum.
But isn't it more likely to derail if it gains momentum?
Depends
I expect it would be more able to cleanly cut through the bodies or throw them out of the way with more momentum. If it's going slow it's more likely to ride up on top of a body. Anecdotally, I've heard that derailers tend not to work on fast moving trains.
Shit man if there's an infinite amount of people there must also be an infinite amount of track. So forget philosophy, I'm getting rich!
Fuck you Ayn Rand! I’m the railroad magnate now!
I come to an agreement with the person who has tied these people to the tracks to untie every 2nd person. I save an infinite number of people!
I tried to do a similar deal and ended up with negative one twelfth of a person dead.
The solution that gains us a person at the limit
And if you convince the now untied individuals to each untie two people, you can now save multiple sets of infinite numbers of people!
I kill the trolley driver. The Dead Man button makes that the trolley stops.
Do nothing, since an infinite number of people implies an inconceivable population overgrowth, so the best possible good for humanity is to cull the population.
Heck, you could probably go out and genocide the rest of the population that isn't tied to the track and still not suffer any real loss. Then, you face the last true enemy: the bloodsoaked beast responsible for the deaths of untold billions- yourself.
Once you've slain that last creature, all of humanity that still remains will be those tied to the railroad track. The only living people will spend their entire lives knowing nothing but the track and the trolley, and the imposing fear that one day, they, too, shall be crushed under its wheels like those before them.
The only life remaining for the human race is now one of terror and eventual slaughter. There are no good outcomes to this conundrum. There are only the uncaring wheels of the trolley.
Just the existence of infinite people implies an infinite space to contain them, and an infinite ecosystem to have produced them. Concerns related to overtaxing a finite ecosystem don't apply.
shouldn't there be at least one guy on the trolley?
This feels like a Warhammer thing.
If you let the train go, it would appear to stop immediately at the first person (assuming it has any reaction whatsoever to hitting a person) as there are infinitely real numbers between any two real numbers you could come up with.
The top track can be assumed to be of infinite length, but for the bottom track this is not enough - to fit ℵ people on it, they'll have to be infinitely compressed. And since they are compressed - they are already dead. I'm not pulling the lever - preventing the (farther) desecration of corpses does not merit killing people who are still alive.
As a mathematician, this strikes me as an entirely reasonable interpretation, except for the fact that the compressed bodies would form a black hole, killing everyone regardless.
So you're correct to say that you wouldn't pull the lever, but your reasoning still missed an important detail.
I don't think a black hole would have time to form before the entire universal collapse, though
that's infinite mass inside infinite volume right there, we aren't talking about only infinite density anymore
we need to get a theoretical physicist on this... track
Seeing an infinite number of people lying there I deduce that I must be in some kind of thought experiment and let the trolley roll on while I look for a way to escape back to reality.
People die faster if you do nothing, so doing nothing seems like the obvious choice
The trolley goes at infinite speed after the branch point. What's your outside the box answer now?
which size infinite speed we talkin’? if its faster than light then maybe we got ourselves a time travel trolley 😎
Join them on the rail
Then you have a choice to do nothing and allow people die, or do a conscious choice to kill people. There's something for everyone, everyone wins (except the people on rails)
As an Engineer with a Physics background I say the most ethical choice is the real numbers side as the tram, having no room to accelerate between victims, will quickly stop, whilst it's more likely it can keep going for ever on the integer branch of the line.
A more effective vehicle for this would be a tank or maybe a steamroller.
(Note to self: keep this in mind if I ever become an Evil Overlord and need to execute large numbers of people in a gruesome manner)
Reminds me of this: https://neal.fun/absurd-trolley-problems/
This is f'ing hilarious 🤣
This is awesome
I just tried to kill the most people every time and apparently a lot of people agree with me
what do you do?
I replace the lever with a quantum switch so it can be a superppsition and kill everyone twice be ause they deserve it I mean look at that massive line of people there is no way they didn't know what was going on before egtting added to the tracks no species thos dumb deserves to escape the trolly my god how did they all get there -continues ranting as trolly aproaches-
PAUSE
And this makes about as much sense as the original question so no educating me!
resumes ranting
Sorry, but technically you would kill infinite people, which while twice as many as infinite people is still the same amount of infinite people...
Might I suggest getting infinite doctors to try and rescue some run over people so they can in fact go to the end of the line and be killed a second...maybe even infinite times.
That trolley is definitely stopping before it makes it through all those people on the bottom track.
Multi-track drifting, baby. Double infinite.
We need to shut down these trolley experiments until we figure out what the hell is going on
I'm just waiting for the black hole to form just from the mass of the infinite people between 0-1 on the Reals track.
Unless the trolley is traveling with infinite velocity or the people have infinitely small mass, it would never make it past its first countable infinity of people. Therefore there is no difference.
Unless it's on infinite slope
Did nobody have math class? The pictures are always misleading!
It never actually specifies the density the people are packed onto the track, the image implies an answer.
I'd argue that the densities should be considered to be equal, regardless of whatever that density value may be. We do not need to solve for the exact value to discuss the problem at hand!
Yeah, we actually have two natural sets here.
Doesn't matter how far appart each person is placed when we are dealing in infinities. We still can map each one on each set without missing any. The cardinality is the same between them.
A representation of the real set would imply infinite superposition of people on the track line... Which means they are already dead lmao
I'd argue such an event would not only kill them but actually delete everything in that universe.
This is all a convoluted way of saying we are already dead in this scenario.
edit: correct integer to natural on first paragraph
edit2: lmao I'm not the first
Only the real cardinallity must. The integer cardinallity could have them spaced out enough that they won't collapse.
For you to do this trolley problem you'd need to be outside the real track black hole so the question becomes: do you let a trolley go into a black hole or do you switch it to an infinite track that kills an infinite number of people?
Edit: in which case the black hole must be infinitely far away and you don't even know about it. So: do you pull the switch to cause a trolley to start killing a seemingly infinite number of people? Which based on the other replies in this thread the answer is a resounding "yes"
Jump in front of the trolley, someone else's problem
Would suck being the last person on either track. It'd be a long and boring wait while tied up
Pull the lever. Save as many lives as you can and hope that someone that now wasn't killed as fast can help come up with a solution for the runaway trolley.
I know many people despise generative AI, but what do you think of this result from Copilot? I am bad at maths so I wonder if you experts can tell.
In your scenario, you have two sets: the integers on the top track and the real numbers on the bottom track. The cardinality of the integers is equal to the cardinality of the real numbers, which is called the continuum hypothesis. Therefore, it seems intuitively more ethical to pull the lever and divert the trolley to the bottom track, where you kill fewer people in any finite time.
it seems intuitively more ethical to pull the lever and divert the trolley to the bottom track,
not an expert but the integer one is at the top i think
It's completely wrong within ZF set theory the cardinality of the integers is stricly smaller than the cardinality of the real numbers. The continuum hypothesis states that there is no set with a cardinality strictly larger than the natural numbers (or integers) and strictly smaller than the real numbers.
It accidentally kind of comes to the right conclusion, but even the conclusion isn't really correct, you don't need to be concerned with finite time since integers are a smaller cardinality.
Let's say people can be placed on a point on the track indexed by the real numbers, given any two seperate, finite, points, there would be more people packed between those two points than the entire integer track.
"The cardinality of the integers is equal to the cardinality of the real numbers, which is called the continuum hypothesis."
The cardinality of the integers is not equal to the cardinality of the reals. The integers are countable (have the same cardinality as the natural numbers). A very famous proof in set theory called Cantor's diagonal argument shows the reals are uncountable (i.e. not countable).
The continuum hypothesis is also not about comparing the cardinality of the reals and the integers or naturals (since we already know the above). The continuum hypothesis is about comparing the cardinality of the reals with aleph_1.
Within the usual set theory of math (ZFC set theory), we can prove that we can assign every set a "cardinal number" that we call its cardinality. For finite sets we just assign natural numbers. For infinite sets we assign new numbers called alephs. We assign the natural numbers a cardinal that we call aleph_0.
These cardinal numbers come with an ordering relationship where one set has a cardinality larger than another set if and only if its associated cardinal number is larger than the other sets cardinal number. So, alepha_0 is larger than any finite cardinal, for example. There is a theorem called Cantor's theorem that tells us we can continually produce larger and larger infinite cardinals in fact.
So, we know the reals have some cardinality, thus some associated cardinal number. We typically call this number the cardinality of the continuum. The typical symbol for this cardinality is a stylized (fraktur) c. Since aleph_0 is countable, every aleph after aleph_0 is uncountable. By definition aleph_1 is the smallest uncountable cardinal number. The continuum hypothesis just asks if aleph_1 and c are equal.
As an aside, it is provable that c has the same cardinality as the powerset of the naturals. We let the cardinality of the powerset of a set with cardinality x be written as 2x. Then we can write the continuum hypothesis in terms of 2{aleph_0} and aleph_1. The generalized continuum hypothesis just swaps out 0 and 1 for an arbitrary ordinal number alpha and its successor in this new notation.
Thanks. Now I know I should avoid using LLM for anything related to maths.
I'm sure if I tried to rephrase the problem getting every detail wrong, I'd do a worse job than this.
But I'd change the number of tracks.
This comment section is politics in action! :-P
i love stirring the pot.
If you want to be a true masochist, you could re-run the experiment on Reddit - hurk 🤮.
The beauty of Lemmy is that here we can at least talk about such neat things:-).
Invent a new number system that provides aneven smaller infinity
The set of all even integers is a smaller infinity
The cardinality is the same, because you can match every integer to an even integer
I get that the answer is supposed to be "it doesn't matter" but if you take time into account, it actually fucking does, and also makes it hugely obvious what the actual answer is.
from the picture this is true but from the statement alone both options are identical
i'd ask for a second train.
If we have infinite people, it wouldn't be such a bad thing to lose a couple.
The same thing most people would do when presented with a Trolly Problem for real. Analysis paralysis, choose to do nothing, then cry softly every night for the rest of my life.
Some infinities are bigger than others but those are both the same sized infinity, ℵ₀. Same if you multi-track drift.
Edit: I didn't read it closely enough, it says "one person for every real number". Which is indeed a larger infinity. However I don't think you can diagram that, the diagram is showing a countable infinity of people on the lower track.
Killing one person for each real number, the train will be killing an uncountably infinite quantity of people in any given finite time slice.
I was gonna say, these 2 infinities are the same. I think Vsauce made a second video on infinity to try and clarify it, but putting "more numbers" in between an infinite amount of numbers doesn't make it larger
If the tracks are scaled to the same unit (presumably one where one human width equals an infinitely small number), everyone in the top track would die of exposure before the trolley even reaches its first victim due to there being infinite distance between integer milestones, whereas everyone in the bottom track would be killed instantly due to any distance traveled having an infinite number of infinitesimals*. So I choose the bottom track to be merciful.
If the tracks don't share the same scale then we don't have enough information to make a judgment.
Even though we already established the one human width rule. Could someone check my logic here? Infinities break my brain.
This was my take too, except I'd send the trolley to the integer track, where it would use infinite time to reach the first victim, thus the trolley never kills anyone. Problem solved.
Them dying to exposure is outside the scope of this task. :)
99% hitler vs. 100% hitler
US_electoral_politics.jpg
Infinity people always die. Even if you don't make a decision.
I'll do nothing. Either way those people will eventually die - because of the train or because of starvation and dehydration. I would prefer the train.
I am sure even countably infinite people would violate some law of thermodynamics.
If you subscribe to the idea that the universe is infinite, there are possibly infinite people in it.
I want to unsubscribe, where do I click
EDIT: I rolled a critical fail in reading comprehension and I thought the other track was N per integer instead of 1 per real number in the previous version of this comment.
The people in the real number track are already dead by the time the trolley arrives due to the forces involved in cramming them so tightly together. I.e. they are basically just a gore pile the moment after the people are somehow arranged like that.
I pick the real number track so that no one new has to die.
I pull the lever and invoke Zeno's paradox to ensure the trolley's position remains < 1 for eternity.
I quickly carry the people to the other side so they all can get run over.
build new tracks to make the trolley run on (possibly in circles).
I actually would like to choose the track where the number of people increases by one (so 1, 2, 3, 4...) and then the train will kill -1/12 people
PS Yes, I know this sum result is problematic, it's only a joke
Pull it -1/12 of the way, causing the infinity to converge to a real number.
Probably pull the leaver cuz then I can jump in front of the train.