A Bunch of Rocks (17 Nov 2008)
A Bunch of Rocks (17 Nov 2008)
7 comments
-
Idk why, but for some reason I always liked this one
-
Reminds me of Calvin and Hobbes
-
Except it's not a simulation of the universe, it's a bunch of stones on the ground. There is no continuity.
-
He bases the next row of stones on the previous one, changing them by a consistent rule? Its an unorthodox computer with infinite memory. Why does that not count as a simulation? I'm not following
-
The only computation that is happening is when he compares two rocks. He doesn't have the memory to store all computations simultaneously.
It's like having a "simulation" of the universe on a hard drive and only really computing on plankt measurement at a time by changing the bits on the hard drive. The data is there, but that's it it's not a live interaction.
-
-
Unless you mean continuity as in non discrete physics, which is fair play for this specific computer but then there is the Planck length to consider.(edit: I am aware that discrete vs continuous is a whole holy war on its own)
-
7 comments