Skip Navigation

China to Curb Excessive Online Games Spending in New Tightening

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/3073672

In this whole article there are only two paragraphs that are not useless word salad:

The government now wants to set a cap on how much money each player can spend within a title, according to the draft.

The regulations also asked that game publishers operating abroad respect Chinese laws and culture and refrain from endangering national security, without elaborating. Tencent is the world’s largest gaming publisher, with investments in studios from Epic Games Inc. in the US to Supercell in Europe. The agency will take feedback on the proposed rules for a month, without saying when they take effect.


Bonus reddit gamer cope:

I can get behind prohibiting these sorts of mechanics. Don't think they really add anything of substance. Though I would prefer that companies and the industry self-regulate rather than having the government step in, but that's unlikely to happen.

Look at this idiot that believes in corporations regulating themselves. I bet he thinks children who believe in Santa (a very real phenomenon whom I once saw in a mall) are stupid.

41 comments
  • Also, it's been funny seeing libs react to this. I've seen a bunch of them say stuff like: "wow, the monstrous CCP finally does something right", lmao. "Monstrous" they say, while they actively shame people into voting for a guy who's supporting a live genocide. Propagandized clowns.

  • To be fair, that lib was saying 'in an ideal world people would be nice but they won't be so I can get behind this'. Which all things considered is what the actual liberal position should be. The one gamer who understands lootboxes exist due to unregulated self interest by large corporations.

  • The regulations also asked that game publishers operating abroad respect Chinese laws and culture and refrain from endangering national security, without elaborating.

    My impression of this line is "we would like you to also follow these laws when publishing your games abroad and not to use 2 different monetisation models, one in china vs one in the west, in order to milk the anglos pockets because they have very poor regulators."

    My guess here is that they're trying to rein in the gaming industry to extend Chinese soft-power. They want the monetisation models to be more popular and they want these models to be used by their companies globally. They want Chinese games to have less awful models than western games as a means of affecting gamer opinions of China.

    It's a good idea. West will either ignore it and their soft power will grow, or the west will do something about the models in their own industries.

    Gaming is the new hollywood imo. It should be the focus of soft power growth.

    • I only have a little familiarity with their games, but if you're using real money to buy one of the pricier characters, you have to buy 180 pulls to do that right? And a pull costs about 2 dollars? So it's like 350 dollars for one character?

      Doing some quick math with median income and tax rates from Google this is about half of a typical person's weekly salary.

      It's not the cost to buy the game, but one character in it.

      I think this law is probably directly targeted at companies like mihoyo.

      • you’re using real money to buy one of the pricier characters, you have to buy 180 pulls to do that right? And a pull costs about 2 dollars? So it’s like 350 dollars for one character?

        What the fuck

    • I am not sure. Why do you think it won't affect them? I don't see any indication of that.

      • I assumed so because none of the articles seem to mention them; I'd expect them to given their size if it affects them.

        Edit: Nvm, some of them do. Very based

41 comments