The Trump budget proposes $0 for climate research in 2026
The Trump budget proposes $0 for climate research in 2026
109 comments
-
-
"christians" just do not give a fuck about kids unless they're touching them or oppressing brown ones smfh
-
-
They pretend to care before the kid is born. But they really just want to subjugate women and make people poorer and more ignorant so that they're more susceptible to religious indoctrination.
-
An unborn kid can be indoctrinated or “enslaved”. Maybe both. They don’t like anyone thinking for themselves.
-
-
I appreciate the quotations. Many people do not understand that inherently they have to wear this mask. Christianity was founded on martyrs who died for what they believed. If Jesus only did 2 'exorcisms' and one of them was to inspire mary Magdalene and the other to dissuade Legionnaire propaganda. Hence the Legion story becomes a fascists pig criticism.
Then again, most christians don't even understand how Jesus existed in a post empire world. Or how that empire made him into the depiction of the devil too.
Jewish traditions essentially praise god and then renounce him for one's self journey. This is why you wish to see angels, messengers, and not the god. The powers in place are usually not your ally, but your family and love can help you prevail.
Do not call god by name, respect his power but give no more. This starts to seem as rules for surviving.
They purposely don the name to weaken the capability of people even attempting to unite behind it. Even if Jesus came back.
-
-
Obviously a clerical error. The decimal place is off. It's supposed to be 0.00
-
Probably a blessing in disguise. If they were funding climate research it would almost certainly be fraudulent science.
-
Whaaaaat...?
The party who put a coal lobbyist in charge of the EPA for Trump's entire previous term did this...?
Nooooo.
/sarcasm
-
🔥La la la 👉🤑👈 not listening 🔥
-
At some point, all one can do is laugh.
109 comments
This is what you voted for protest-non-voters.
Maybe they think the flooding won’t affect them on their moral high ground.
They'll never claim an ounce of the responsibility they deserve, the fucking scumbags
Ha ha but You voted for Genocide!
/s
So did the protest non-voters, even moreso than the Democrat ones.
The non-genocide position was literally impossible to express no matter what you tried to do.
But at least we didn't help hurrying along the most recent great extinction!
I wonder if anything we built will last for the next sentient species that arises.
Oh, no doubt, but a worse foe lurks! Some people voted for Donald Trump.
I totally feel this frustration, and I'm not US so it's kinda not my business, but I don't buy this argument.
Trump America is a horror show, for sure. But the status quo before Trump is also the foundations that allowed America to become a new facist state. Any real solutions need to be bigger than what middle of the road Democrats are offering.
That doesn't mean you shouldn't vote against Trump. But the system is clearly broken, stop blaming victims of it, and start blaming its perpetrators.
Status quo of Biden implementing Green energy, EVs, build back better, PACT act, chips act, student debt relief, Obama's healthcare. And you're equating this to .... status quo.... , and .... a foundation of a fascist state. ........
No need to stoop to their level. It legitimizes their behavior.
Protest non-voters accounted for maybe 800k, while RFK accounted for 1.3m.
But sure, let's keep blaming voters instead of the Democrats that chose to represent Republican Lite™.
Republican lite at this moment sounds a lot more refreshing than Republican nazi
I'm informing protest-non-voters what they actually voted for.
Can we give this rhetoric a rest? The voting system, the enforced lack of alternatives, hell even really the people who voted for this shit are all much more to blame than people who didn't vote. Or how about the fact "Multiple Republican-led administrations removed voters from their states' voter rolls in the lead up to the election"? Or the fact you don't even vote on the week-end, which is what pretty much all civilised countries do, to give more chances to more people especially poor people to get to the voting stations?
On top of that, how can you know what people who didn't vote would have voted for? Some of the states with the lowest turnout are one that are historically considered more conservative-leaning (Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, Missisipi, Tennessee). The results could have been "worse" (whatever that means, given the shitshow that is the Electoral College).
Really, it feels like it's so much easier to blame a subset of people than to confront the fact that, in the US, the majority of the population appears to be for an autocratic asshat who has claimed they wouldn't need to vote after they vote for him. The US population, as a majority, appear to want this. More people voting may not have changed anything about that.
It's not surprising that voter turnout is now when you have an unhealthy democracy (because it is a symptom of it). This is a bit like blaming people for eating unhealthily when all that's available to eat is unhealthy: you're not wrong that it's bad for them, but what the fuck are you actually doing do provide better options? So rather than blame those who didn't vote, for any variety of reasons, get organising. Low turnout is a seed that was planted a long time ago.
Fuck no, no voting protest voters are part of the reason we have this sweeping fascist rule in our country. So no, they don't get a boo hoo pass on that shit.
And in 12 months' time, the voting system will allow just one option. Great move, guys... great move.
Nope, got another 3.5 years of reminding protest-non-voters what they voted for.
I don’t often use internet lingo, but the people yelling into the void about “non voters” are 100% doing what the internet deems, a “cope”
Inventing an invisible boogeyman to yell at because things are bad makes them feel better.
Quick edit: it’s frustrating how downvoted you are for being correct, honestly.
The people who did not vote for Harris destroyed all chances of ever getting a better candidate.
Nope. These people need to feel just as stupid as Trump voters in 2016 who subsequently voted for Biden after seeing the result. Given how many are still defensively showing up to post walls of text every time this is brought up, there's a lot of work to be done to overcome the counter-messaging.
We should absolutely do what we can to primary feckless centrist Democrats, and to push the party to the left, but that's not mutually exclusive with getting people to show up and not make the same stupid decision twice. We aren't going to completely fix our democracy in 2 years to the point that these idiots will be satisfied. We can make headway on making things better, but people need to vote for that to happen.
So to be absolutely clear: if you did not vote, this is what you voted for. That should be upsetting, you should feel bad, and you should make damn sure that you don't make the same mistake in 2026, 2028, or any other election as long as you live.