If every minority group came together under the same banner they would be the majority, and rights would be much easier to attain for everyone.

That's what intersectionality is about, and why fascists focus on driving wedges between groups

Not everything is about fascists.
- You're right, it's also about the capitalists who put them in power.
- This specifically is though.

Why do you think the fascists try so hard to keep them divided and fighting each other?

Why do you believe fascists are the only parties working to, and actively benefiting from, division in human populations?
- Because the companies and ultra rich contribute financially to fascists to take away our rights, and drive wedges between people. What are you talking about if not oligarchy and fascism? Like, some kind of softball league?

Welcome to the radical left.

Well, unless you're some kind of Democrat. In which case, get your bougie, genoside lovin' ass outta here. Only the real leftists will be allowed under the banner.
- I see what you did there.
- How do you define a "real leftist"?
- I'm uhh a Democrat in name only. My father was a Democrat and my voter registration says Democrat, but I don't believe in their neoliberal values
- What are you talking about?
- Yeah, the way we can show all minorities that we're in this together, that we'll stand by each other even when it's unpopular and inconvenient, to stop the state from splitting off groups and trampling them underfoot... is to split off Palestinians and support candidates who want to trample them underfoot because standing up for them is too inconvenient.
I find it to be a more centrist position considering the amount of purity testing required to pass on either side of the political spectrum in the modern age.

Hence divide and conquer.

And even more people under the same social class should band together that would have a much bigger majority

This assumes the minority groups can all agree on things in order to “come together.”

They're deliberately being divided.
- Everyone is being deliberately divided. It’s not specific to minority groups. I guess my issue is that the post is vague and assumes minority groups act as voting blocs which is pretty simplistic. OP is basically saying what everyone already knows: that there are more people making up “minorities” than there are making up the “majority.” I would argue that your local community has a higher impact on your vote than your ethnicity or race. For sure, those play a part, but they don’t singularly define your vote. Also, various minority groups skew quite differently. Latinos typically skew more conservative than, say Jews or blacks.
This assumes the minority groups can all agree on things in order to “come together.”
Do you know what a moot point is?
- I do, and my point wasn’t. Not all minority groups agree on everything just because they’re minorities. The world is a tad more complicated than that. Besides, what are they “coming together” to do? Overthrow the “majority?” Does that automatically assume that the majority is wrong and minorities are right just because they’re minorities? Again, the world’s just not that simple.
- I suspect you've never hung out with enough different minority groups to understand the scope of difficulty. I mean FFS the Latinos vote against immigration, The poor vote against social services. Even when you run into a minority group that is doing things in their best interest, they're not inclined to stick their neck out for people outside there subgroup. Nobody else is taking care of them so they take care of themselves and they give no F's about the other minorities
  The concept that all the minorities together aren't a minority anymore is true at some level, I think you've got a better chance of having white leftists stand up for them then them standing up for each other.

The oppressive class usually isn't a majority (capital owners/rich, religious fanatics, morning people), but they dictate so much more of our lives, what to feel, who to hate - so much so that they make the majority work for them against the minorities (that don't affect the lives of the majority in the slightest - but that's just how the oppressors retain control & power).

This doesn't really change, or add, to my point does it?
- Change no, but it was my humble intention to add a little bit.
  \ Understanding things/humans & why we behave bad is important imho.
  Basically banning minorities together is in a lot of ways how the majority is made. And those never behave in the interest of most.

Hell why stop with every minority group combined? Throw the majority group in there too, now everybody's on the same side! Why didn't I think of this sooner??

Look at the big brain on Brad!

Getting every group to do one thing together is harder than you think.

Does that change my point?
- Hey, I just realised that if Brownian motion carries all the water molecules away together, I won't need a towel after my shower.
  Sorry, what? Your point? I suppose not.

And if sunshine and farts were money I'd be rich as fuck. Fantasies are fun.

If people like you just decided to be quiet, we would also have an easier time.

That's not how that works.

This is why many people I know have started referring to themselves as members of the "global majority" rather than "minority".

But also, yeah this is a class war and if the lower classes stopped perpetuating the division that the wealthy/powerful have forced on us, we could all make everything better. Eat the rich.

All these minorities may share a common problem yet it's unlikely they have the same vision for the solution.

Like how republicans think they’re victims?

This is a lesson that the religious fundamentalists currently running the USA have weaponised.

This is a lesson that the religious fundamentalists currently running Turkey have weaponised.

Probability not relevant under a dictatorship or first past the post elections, but…