Maybe if the article actually got to the point instead of rambled on and on about “thirst traps” and the like, it would be more obvious what it was actually (trying to be) about.
This is what happens when you think you have a story, but it turns out you don't. Image editing apps exist and are getting easier to use, big whoop?
I for sure thought this was gonna be about "AI cameras". Seems all phones nowadays have some kind of software to make the camera seem less shitty, but nope, it's about people making a choice to edit their photos.
This hand-wringing bullshit would feel much more weighty if a FOSS alternative with manual controls didn't exist available for free on the same OS and the same device: https://f-droid.org/packages/net.sourceforge.opencamera/
This article is talking mostly about generative AI features like the ones in the new Pixel phone. There's a big difference between filters and minor touchups and entirely changing the position of people and objects in a few taps.
The default setting for the default camera on my phone already "enhances" your appearance by making your eyes bigger and trying to squash your jaw line. I hate that I can't even change it so that the filter is always off; I have to disable it manually every time I go to take a picture.