No bloat
No bloat
No bloat
I always remove the Bri*ish English pack.
๐คฎ๐คฎ๐คฎ
Mon Dieu, qui voudrait supprimer le pack de langue franรงaise ?
i love Linux tips! you can also print animated clams on the CLI with :(){ :|:& };:
add to your bashrc to be greeted everytime you open a terminal!
but seriously, don't run that unless you want to reboot.
Thanks to modern linux environment I didn't even need to reboot, after 3 minutes it just stopped. It's strange that I could use all my programs except htop
and ps
...
Love all the people angry at this in the comments since you KNOW they fell for it before.
Jโaimerais vous interrompre pour un moment. Ce que vous appelez Linux est, en rรฉalitรฉ, GNU/Linux ou, comme je me suis misยทe ร lโappeler rรฉcemment, GNU plus Linux. Linux nโest pas un systรจme dโexploitation en soi, mais plutรดt un autre composant libre dโun systรจme GNU pleinement fonctionnel rendu utile par les librairies GNU, les utilitaires du shell et les composantes systรจmes vitales, formant un systรจme dโexploitation complet tel que dรฉfini par POSIX.
Plusieurs ordinateurs utilisent chaque jour une version modifiรฉe du systรจme GNU, sans sโen rendre compte. A travers une tournure particuliรจre des รฉvรฉnements, la version de GNU qui est largement utilisรฉe aujourdโhui est souvent appelรฉe Linux, et plusieurs de ses utilisateurยทices ne sont pas au courant quโil sโagit pratiquement du systรจme GNU, dรฉveloppรฉ par le projet GNU.
Linux existe vraiment, et ces gens sโen servent, mais cโest juste une partie du systรจme quโiels utilisent. Linux est le noyau; le programme dans le systรจme qui alloue les ressources de la machine aux autres programmes que vous exรฉcutez. Le noyau est essentiel au systรจme dโexploitation, mais inutile par lui-mรชme; il ne peut fonctionner que dans le contexte dโun systรจme dโexploitation complet. Linux est normalement utilisรฉ en combinaison avec le systรจme dโexploitation GNU: le systรจme au complet est pratiquement GNU avec Linux ajoutรฉ, ou GNU/Linux. Et toutes les soi-disant distributions Linux sont en rรฉalitรฉ des distributions de GNU/Linux!
Richard M. Sgrandhomme (probablement)
"Sgrandhomme" was jarring enough to get me to go look up the etymology of Stallman, and it's apparently nothing to do with men and more to do with the mouth (myn) of a stream (stรฆl).
Unfortunately, ยซ(De l')embouchure du ruisseauยป is a bit long for a surname, French or otherwise. I could see abbreviated variants of that mistakenly turning into "Rousseau", "Lambert" and "Dubois", if not others, but "Ruisseau" itself could work. There's apparently a book called "Monsieur Ruisseau", but I get the impression that it's not a common surname in French (a bit like how "Stream" isn't in English), and also, it completely ignores the -man part of the name.
Going another direction gives "Crique", but in modern French that means "cove" which isn't quite the right meaning, and also doesn't seem to be a surname.
Yet another direction takes "Stallman" to mean "shopkeeper", and from that we might get "Marchand" or a variant, which is definitely a French surname.
ooh, thatโs interesting! thank you for sharing
honestly, i didnโt really put much effort into it, it was part of the joke that the translation would be botched (originally, i wanted to translate "stall" directly, and came up with two plausible translations: "stalle", which would be pretty boring (no pun intended), and "retarder", which nope nope nope nope, french is my first language, i know that means something else in french, but i am NOT using that)
I fell for a similar (but less) obvious joke on my first Linux installation back in 1995. That one used dd instead of rm. I lost a lot of code that I had written. After that, I've failed to see the humor in this kind of joke. There's always the risk that someone new doesn't understand it's a joke, and tries it out.
It happened in this very post, actually. Serves them right for French bashing.
The rest of the time, I'd agree with you, I've never done this joke nor condone it.
I prefer the less harmful "alt+F4" joke, though most people know what that one does by now.
I agree. The / directory may receive special considerations, and it may be extra protected, but once I was doing something with rm -r and ../* in some folder inside my home directory... it wasn't fun.
Something-something trees are an invasive species so add --no-preserve-root
Have you ever tasted Root preserves? It's awful it tastes like wood, no sugar. I always enter --no-preserve-root. A little bit ruin's the whole batch.
You're deleting everything but root, so not needed.
Anything but root and hidden elements directly below root.
You need to add --no-preserve-root as it means "no, preserve root(language)"
You are not funny. Your parents are not funny. Your grand parents were not funny. In fact, you have a long standing ancestry of non funny bastards.
If you're dumb enough to hate the French, you deserve what's about to happen to you.
What does it actually do?
These are unix/linux terminal actions.
'sudo' controls access rights, so it's effectively like Windows admin rights. People typically wouldn't be allowed to use sudo unless they own the system or are some kind of system administrator (like in a workplace).
The 'rm' is the remove function, or deleting files or folders.
'-rf' are two options you can specify with the 'rm' to . The '-r' part means recursive, and effectively conforms to the 'rm' you do in fact want to delete a directory (folder). Normally rm would not, and rmdir I think only works on empty directories. The '-f' option forces removal of all items without any prompts for confirmation for individual items found for removal.
Then the '/*' is the file and or directory path you want to remove. In this case it's the top of the system. The entire statement is essentially a joke about a full delete of your computer.
If it were on an old installation of linux, it would delete everything on the file system, from every disk attached.
Modern Linux systems require an additional flag to explicitly stay that you want to nuke your system.
Eats itself inside out
Mais pourquoi vouloir supprimer le paquet linguistique franรงais ?
I assume this comment is in French since all I see is a blank comment, because I have deleted the bloat language pack.
Thanks Linux tech tips!