Big Tech Doesn't Want You to Know This About Marx

12 comments

Mark's had a lot of emotional ideas with almost no mathematical theories that could be proven or consistently relied upon. It's all "this feels like it should be right" and no calculations. He got a lot right about how people feel, but a lot wrong about how policy will accurately affect economies.
- Famously, Das Kapital starts with "dear diary, today i feel very sad and I wish I didn't feel sad. Kisses, Mark"
- Good bait, but writing Mark's was a step too far. You flew too close to the sun, mate.
  
  I see I failed here. Damn that autocorrect. But I will take the consequences of my failure. My shame is bitter. (Yes I'm talking out of my ass here, but not in my criticism of Marx) Give me a mathematical equation or economic law proposed by Marx. Not a stump speech, but something that uses math that can be proven or disproven.
  For example, ROI on government investment (which includes tax cuts) can be calculated quite accurately. Anything under a 1.0 is a loss. The projected ROI can be checked with the final ROI and economists propose theories as to why it was incorrect using new mathematical models that then have to be proven or disproven. I don't remember seeing anything like that in Marx's work. His was all stump speech that evokes strong feelings of camaraderie and unification. But I am always open to learning. Provide me the math he proposed and its results (the accuracy of those predictions). Not just ideas.
- this criticism "feels" like something someone who's never actually read Marx might think sounds right, but very quickly falls apart when you start reading Capital and realize that he's responding to liberal economists of his time with very specific critiques by working through their own economic logic, and yes, using real world examples to illustrate his points
  maybe you're confused because you mistakenly believe Marx invented communism and wanted everyone to share the same toothbrush, when in reality the bulk of his economic writing is spent analyzing and critiquing the foundational assumptions of capitalist production and exchange

12 comments