Skip Navigation

196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

not_IO @lemmy.blahaj.zone

6d ago

spectrum rule

37 comments

So.. This means noone can say for sure if it is gayer to like bears or twinks.
We just know both are gayer than straight people.
- Not really true? I'm not entirely certain the Kinsey scale is advanced enough to quantify this, but I think liking slim femme twinks is closer to straight than liking big husky bears.
  
  What about guys who like rough muscular girls with strapons?
  At some point, you should embrace the blur. It's all one massive ball of wibly wobly sexy wexy.
  
  But on the other hand, if a femboy twink is attracted to femboy twinks, wouldn't he be more gay than a femboy twink attracted to bears? Because the former is attracted to people more similar to himself?
  
  so you're saying that big bara men powerfucking each other is the gayest thing in existence?
  i'm down.
  
  Ah, but is it gayer to be a big husky bear who likes big husky bears, or to be a slim femme twink who likes big husky bears?

raises hand since when does a spectrum not imply a total order?
- A spectrum does imply a total order, but I'd argue that the meme stating there is exactly 1 who is the gayest, OOP is referring to a strict total order. I'd also argue that the gayness spectrum allows degenerate states (heh) and as such is a non-strict total order, rather than the strict total order implied by OOP
- A spectrum can have multiple dimensions, like the colour spectrum: obviously red is more red than orange, but blue and green are equally non-red.
  
  Isn't the colour spectrum just wavelength? (which also means stuff like pink isn't on there)

Every non-empty finite subset of N admit a maximal element. As humanity is a finite subset of N, there is someone there which is the gayest of all.
- That's still only if gayness has a total order, partial orders don't need to have one maximal element. (like, if you can say that both Alice and Bob are gayer than Charlie, but you cannot compare Alice's gayness to Bob's)
  
  I've been telling Charlie he's not gay enough for years
  
  Inifinitesimaly small increments of gayness must exist and thus the gayest person as well.
- You're assuming gayness is both integral one-dimensional and integral.
  Personally, I think gayness is homomorphic to the set ℝ².
  
  According to that logic, straightness would be heteromorphic to the set ℝ².
  Destroyed by pure logic
  
  You're right, I've mixed denombrability of the set and sortability of the measure (don't know if it is the right words in engkish).
  On my side, I'm not sure about dimension or continuity of gayness norm.
  
  So instead of general gayness, you have an axis for twink attraction and bear attraction?

The gayest and straightest would be too busy fucking too post.

This is great. Is there a math memes community on Lemmy to repost this?
- I dont think so, but I would love one
- !mathmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone exists

Is there gay in invisible parts of the spectrum?
Can I be cosmic gay?
- We are all cosmic gays on this blessed day

I imagine it’s like Highlander where there can be only one…and Sean Connery is there.
- "You're the man now, dog" takes a completely different twist.
  
  I’m trying not to laugh too hard so my family doesn’t ask me what I’m laughing at.

37 comments